DrunkFlux

March 6

Alpha only gives +1 at tiers 3 and 4, tier 1 and 2 powers only give a +1, Musculature core boost is only a tier 2, so your only getting the enhancement effect but not the +1.

The Lore/Destiny also only give an "incarnate level shift" at tier 3 and 4, "Incarnate" level shifts only apply to incarnate specific content.

So you still have more to progress for your alpha slot before you have the consistent +1 in the rest of the game 45-50. Once youg et up to any of the four tier 3 alpha powers you'll have the +1 and you'll keep it once you get to tier 4.

March 5

On 3/3/2024 at 9:37 AM, FFFF said:

I've had my share of bad pick-up groups recently though the majority of my teaming experiences have mostly been quiet competence, teammates who join and fulfill expectations but are relatively quiet.

There are some of us that have well over a decade plus of experience, and let's be honest, this game isn't that tough. There's really nothing that require twitch reflexes, buffs/debuffs are very powerful and encounters are rare where you require players to act in a specific sequence or apply anything more than the simplest of strategies (e.g., "don't go on the stairs until we clear around it).

And yet we are regaled continually of stories of incompetence, bad team play, and sometimes bad behavior bordering on griefing.

This would make sense if this was 2004 and the player base had only a couple of months under their collective playing experience, but this is 20 years later. Yes, there are "AE babies", characters that are manned by players who rush to level 50, but I think those are rarer than what most people believe. I think this is an overwhelming veteran playing base, and the state of play from our random pick-up group doesn't seem to match what I think should be better overall play.

I wonder a little if the bad play could be a result of part-time play. The vast majority of us have careers, families, activities, outside of this game and dip in only here or there. Maybe, it's truly rust. I know that I'm competent on just about anything pre-incarnate but I'm not knowledgeable about iTrials or how to speed past certain obstacles.

The other reason could be that some of us just don't care that much about our quality of play. I know there's more than a few that may enjoy an adult beverage or two while playing and that could obviously affect judgment, reflexes or even behavior. Others may just be tired of the pace of traditional team (which begs the question of why join one in the first place) and may try to solo in the context of a team.

Thoughts?

Its not from people having lives so much as people just not learning the mechanics much when they do play. Be it from being an AE baby, though thats very rare actually, or simply never learning how buffs/debuffs work.

The weakest PI team I ever had was lead by an empathy defender. And you can 100% guess why it was weak; they clearly over-valued healing and had not understood the value of buffs/debuffs and there was no other +1 toon. I eventually left. I did save teams before by myself whenever I switched to my widow, however, but she's designed around salvaging weak teams.

March 5

On 2/29/2024 at 4:51 AM, ZemX said:

More redirect it, I think. AE farming is there for people who want easy farming and sitting their way to 50. Out in the game world, it's a good thing if you don't have pushover enemies like old Council that become everyone's punching bag because that causes teams to be more boring and repetitive. Newbies joining those teams might be more quickly turned off if it's just an endless stream of Council punching-bags.

If this means less "Council PI Radios" teams then it's a success. Doesn't mean PI Radios won't still be used as a leveling platform but if it means more people are just running whatever the police scanner hands them instead of reloading, reloading, reloading to get more easy Council to bash... so much the better.

Honestly AE farming shouldn't be the only way to rapidly level toons from 1 to 50. in fact, AE farming is almost akine to cheating practically, always has been, only reason it never seems to get hit hard as AE fire farmers always claim is because its the fire farmer doing all the work, no one else ever joins in except hitters like blasters with max fire-resist and high defense on top of that.

When we just close off power leveling routes players find other ones, its true, and then close those off all it'd do is just make the HC team come off as nothing but nerf-heads. And honestly I don't think most players have the kind of time required to level toons from 1-50 normally. Even con enemies give such low exp that I barely notice the bar moving, when I join friends in non-50 content exemplared down to say, mid 20s I often don't notice the exp bar climbing at all, even on non-50s with double exp. I run say, 6-7 missions with them and only gain like, 3-4 bars of exp at most in that time span.

Edit: I am fine with PI teams going for others but I had seen one PI team only go after council still, like the team leader hadn't caught onto how the council play being much harder for lowbies to survive and the teams killing power wasn't quite high enough to stop warwolves from popping up.

March 5

19 hours ago, WumpusRat said:

CoH's rng has always been loopy. That's why they added the streakbreaker in the first place, because you'd often see 6-7 misses in a row even with a 95% to hit.

Its clock based RNG and yes, very badly designed, and always has been more working against the player than the enemy mobs, rather than evenly between the two.

My most frustrating deaths on defense based builds have always the dreaded "double hit" where I get hit by two attacks at the same time rolling sub-5, not even a proper defense cascade, no time to react, just full health to zero in an instant. Because the two mobs attacked at the same time when the RNG clock happened to be sub-5.

This also leads to an annoying factor with the player when the same attack in the attack chain, and one of your better attacks, missing every time. Wait about 1 second before attacking and it stops suddenly, every single time.

March 5

16 minutes ago, skoryy said:

I did some beta testing to see just how tough the new Council was, I didn't have any problems then. It didn't really hit me until this afternoon when I was slogging through Warwolf bosses during lunch. I thought I could do a quick hero tip and that quite didn't work out.

Thats largely why my stalker ended up clearing the mobs faster than my blaster, it was 'entirey' the warwolf boss spawns making them effectively more annoying freakshow. My blasters I feel were only getting closer risk of being defeated purely due to the bosses simply living longer, while my stalker was fine simply due to being able to survive a protracted fight against boss ranks and also had far superior single-target DPS, that her inferior AoE was entirely negated compared to the blasters.

It'll always take a long time to clear through council now.

March 3

3 hours ago, WumpusRat said:

I occasionally did some PI groups that specifically went after Malta and Carnies, since people tend to avoid them like the plague.

And it was always a fun time introducing some people to Carnies' giant weakness to lethal damage, and watch them just tearing through missions like a chainsaw through cotton candy. 🙂

I admit I find carnies and malta more fun overall and always found them fun to fight. If anything, I think they are still more fun than the new CoT, since they are managable groups that aren't really overpowered in any particular manner. Carnies weakness to lethal and malta are just kind of dependent on CC, the sappers are just glass cannons that stick out like a sore thumb, I felt them also a lot of fun. I had noticed most people ignore though the more threatening enemies in both groups; sappers get focused but gunslingers not so much, in the case of carnies, dark ring mistresses are not dealt with by ranged toons as fast as they should be imo(they are effectively death mages).

Whats funny is I think Malta are way easier than the new CoT and honestly thinking on it, the council are capable of doing way more aoE damage, some even guaranteed, so lowbie teams are likely to get hit especially hard guaranteed, but I noticed that its not the worst, and the warwolves are just an extra health bar to drill through more than anything. The new CoT are a bit higher than banished pantheon now(maybe we should buff banished then? Just cause...), though my blaster never had problems with the nukes.

Like, I've usually one of two goals on toons:

Either:

A: They are strongest possible solo with maybe some leadership. So if the team drops they can still keep going, the last alive.
B: Make the entire team virtually unstoppable. Which is well, my support toons, they aren't made to be super solo focused.

The toons I was testing were in the former, since non-support toons. I admit I rarely play them as I had bad experiences playing support during live, but thats a tale for another time.

Last team I was in: council only, team mostly died to AoE res powers and the PBAoE life drains, except a few +1's, the non-50s 90% losses were from the eclipse, with only a few from the equinox's. But no CoT, it was just all council.

March 3

On 3/1/2024 at 4:26 AM, golstat2003 said:

Support toons have been doing this for years. Team leaders just have to realize what they do and invite them. When I run teams and I know we are going on the MJ arc for instance, I make sure to try to find debuffer/buffers/control folks. As opposed to yet another blaster / melee team member.

EDIT: Also for the OP, when you form teams start at the base difficulty. If you find you put together a team that can handle tougher raise it up slightly the next mission. I always suggest to team leaders that it's actually counter productive to assume any team you form can handle the higher difficulties until they prove that. At base difficulties, the new COT and new Council can just be steam rolled like they always have been. This is fine.

Yeah usually my intent, though I also sometimes switch toons if i'm on a lowbie and the teams leader likes taking on more than they can chew. I rarely actually form teams, if i'm being honest.

And yeah I noticed most teams can still destroy them without much difficulty, this was more for when I needed to switch to someone cause a team was bad. Honestly maybe i'm just being to insecure about it, after-all usually the best solution to a bad team is to leave, usually. But sometimes I like to switch to a toon to save one.

On 3/1/2024 at 4:48 AM, UltraAlt said:

Looks like the "game isn't challenging enough" crowd have some challenges now.

I guess it was too much of a bother to turn it down and see how far you had to turn it down before it wasn't 100% undoable?

It may seem like I'm taunting you, but I'm really not.

I bet they aren't too difficult when you don't crank the notoriety to max.

Personally, if I want to fight 6 zillion guys - more or less - single-handedly, I will play Dynasty Warriors instead of CoH.

Its more for when i'm switching in an effort to save a team more than anything. I found them easy on the ice blaster on +2, and also was in a team that crushed them very very quickly, so much so the archons never got to transform into warwolves. so I'm kind of retracting on the Council a bit further, though I don't think I even stated the council as OP to begin with. Mostly just the CoT and the overkill to-hit debuff making focused accuracy a requirement which I kind of hate if i'm being honest, as it feels like all the new pools added just as well have not been added at all to the game. Bad design there as a few others mentioned so far in this thread.

February 29

7 hours ago, Psyonico said:

So, long and short, you're expecting to be able to solo something that is designed to be difficult (but doable) on an 8 man team?

I was gauging how well my toons could do so I could know how well I could carry a team or not with them and whether things were fair or not, an largely sharing my thoughts on it so far. I already adjusted the build of the ice blaster to account for the dark damage attacks, and plan to gauge and perfect over time :). Experimentation phases and all that.

But its also a mentality; if I was to join a 54 and I needed to switch to a 50+1(I have had bad teams with weak incarnates even before this update, collosally weak in fact) I wanted to make sure I was bringing a toon up to the challenge. Something worthy of difficult combat. Fixing flawed builds is always something I'm doing anyways. To be unable to solo them is also to be unable to carry a struggling team. A standard I go by on all my builds, be it support, tank, dps ect. I already have my widow but she makes the rest of the team unstoppable, this experiment was for my non widow toons.

36 minutes ago, Clave Dark 5 said:

Good! I think the changes were meant to remove easy farming/sleeping your way to 50.

I suspect the same, I mean I saw teams when leveling toons myself who were captained by people who were far from capable of handling even the council back then, let alone say, CoT today.

4 hours ago, Parabola said:

The tohit debuff thing is why I take focused accuracy on just about every melee toon. I figured out a long time ago that it's the debuffs that are the cause of 90% of high level deaths and I build accordingly. It's not a new problem for cot though. Prior to the upgrade they would constantly spawn death mages who run a -tohit aura. Getting into a fistfight with four of them wasn't uncommon and it was only winnable with focused accuracy.

I admit I usually just split them a bit and then cut them down after, rather than simply trying to "tank spank" them, in fact I prefer mobile builds specifically to deal with patches and ensure i'm always in the best position for cone attacks ect. Maybe i'll actually take a second look at focused accuracy, since I realize they lowered the end cost of it considerably(at least I thought in a patch note? Mids says otherwise, unless it was even more and i'm remembering incorrectly). Hard to though when snipes can do so much damage that its a huge loss to take focused accuracy for a few mobs. But it does make me think of how I could improve on the stalker who excelled at the council already to punish the CoT even further on her.

February 29

So I'm trying to solo them on 8x+3, reason being that if forming a 54 PI team, often there are lowbies, if your the only incarnate and not able to 100% solo things, then the team is going to struggle very very hard.

So with this in mind, I decided to so far try the mobs on 8x+3 for one main reason: Some mobs are 53, some are 54 due to some getting 1 level higher than the setting(barring 54 streight). So far;

Melee toons struggled against CoT due to way, way to much -tohit aura spam, I ran into a situation on one of my scrappers where I had to just flat out abandon the mission, it was 100% undoable. They'd stack to much -tohit and I had no effective counter to it. My stalker could partially counter it, but even then I frequently had to pull back, and this was only one run. Also I had noticed confuse/terrorize are used in spades and many sets provide no protection from that, which horribly damages one of the main draws to playing melee classes/sentinels, protection from CC. My ice/martial/ice blaster was able to deal with them largely due to simply destroying them at a distance thus negating the huge to-hit aura. My staff/bio/mu scrapper in fact had the worst luck; a mob composing almost exclusively of death mages and ghosts, due to just sheer luck. She couldn't do any damage, at, all, due to the sheer amount of to-hit debuffs. Even judgement couldn't hit 'any' of them.

Meanwhile, my ice/martial/ice blaster couldn't deal with the council to terribly well. This was due to a combination of factors, the big one being that dark eclipse archons have WAY to much health, and also almost ALWAYS turn into dark warwolves which are also very, very tanky. Even though she leans heavily towards survivability she struggled and died TWICE, which to me is an F. My water/time/fire blaster meanwhile died once on the first run, but managed to avoid dying the second run after switching to diamagnetic and spamming the hell out of AoEs to stack it asap on the mobs. Even then I had a few close calls such as two big hits in a row both rolling identical 4%'s. She even handled 3 mobs consecutively but the slower ST kill speed that blasters generally have compared to a certain other class, it was only due to having to escort a very slow npc and lower ST issues). After a third mission I concluded my water/time/fire blaster was in a better direction and it leads me to consider a respec fore the ice/martial/ice to an ice/martial/soul blaster(since neg energy damage is so rare in IOs *shrugs*).

My DB/Bio/Energy Stalker actually stomped the council super easy and even cleared the map faster, purely due to the ST being higher ST against bosses allowing her to dispatch the dark eclipse archons/dark warwolfs so much faster that the lower AoE(Still had some) actually didn't matter, I was able to clear the mobs just fast enough and clear the bosses faster that my clear time was far, far higher. This wasn't perfect as she also had some difficulty with circle of thorns and to-hit debuff spam, but I could always teleport out of the auras and patches quickly.

I'll continue periodicly testing characters against 8x+3 council/CoT to see how things are effected. So far;

There seems to be no limit on -tohit aura spam for the circle of thorns. This isn't cool for melee at all and was a main problem players had with the original positron TF. God help a pure melee team. This in fact actually lines into fake difficulty; best you can hope for is keeping moving away and use the ST you have from your ancillery pool, god help you if your main set has no ranged attack which is 90% of them for a clear reason.
Council aren't to bad but the dark eclipse archons(which always turn into dark warwolves) are so tanky(due to 90% of the time turning into dark warwolves) that high ST builds out-pace high AoE builds, unless they have a lot of both. The non-vampire eclipse galaxies seem far, far more interesting now, though, and are actually a lot of fun with teleports and the reses. So for team gameplay they are nice, solo the dark warwolves are more annoying attack sponges that might sometimes hit you absurdedly hard. This was a problem for the blasters, not so much for the stalker.

Both groups are much harder than arachnos and carnies.

Honest opinion; With my tier of F being far to easy to A and S being very fun, and SS+ being cheating and very frustrating with no fun:

CoT: Overtuned, easily, melee simply cannot counter 10+ to-hit auras when a mob is unlucky enough to have a lot of ghosts spammed in it. Combined with confuse and terrorize having no cc protection for many sets, this puts them in SS+, cheater level. Tone the ghosts to-hit spam back, or relegate that kind of spam to TF's only. This is NOT fun for radio missions, not, even remotely. I also noticed the other mages, ruin/madness/agony seemed surprisingly rare so far. Since it seems to just spam dark to-hit debuffs and nothing but, this makes them feel like a poorly designed AE mob with to-hit anchors spammed. So thus, SS+ cheater level.

Council: Far more balanced, but dark eclipse archons seem to be the most common bosses at times, and always turn into dark warwolves. When every single mob seems to have one 90% of the time and then 95% of the time turn into dark warwolves, it gets repetitive fast. I very rarely encountered the more interesting eclipse galaxies and there lt/boss counterparts, I ultimately felt council to be annoying in spots with some missed potential, but it might be my rotten luck. A tier. Nice roadblocks but my luck turned fighting them into a slog on my blasters, and my stalker managed to out-pace the blasters inspite far less AoE firepower simply due to superior ST being the big winner in this.

Things this has done in this update: I won't be building blasters as much but I also won't be fighting circle of thorns solo, if I do ever form teams i won't be ever picking circle of thorns until they tone back the to-hit spam.

Edit: I Am going to make some clarification, these conclusions were made regarding solo play, for two reasons; Some of us enjoy being able to solo things, and also 53 and 54 teams often only the leader is 50+1 and I've not always seen top builds, and I wanted to see how my top-end builds performed and also tested one scrapper even with a medium-build. I am very glad i'm not the only one who feels this way about the new mobs.

54 with only 50+1 is effectively one player carrying the team, and they may be fine with it as they want the company, also many people join 54 on non 50s because yes, they are trying to level lowbies, and may not have a few months to level that toon in the long run, or simply not the time to grind forever. And 54 PI is actually faster than AE due to even the non 50s participating. When a mob is powerful enough, 54 teams simply move onto other mobs and ignore the more dangerous ones. Ironicly, I find even malta to be easier than the new CoT, and the new council are just meat-bags in teamplay, simply taking longer to clear.

54 normal mode ITF is still faster yet than 54 PI, and honestly i wouldn't ever want the normal mode ITF to get the changes to it that hard mode introduces.

February 29

CO deserved it, 100%, considering the hard neglect the game has had. OR the bipolar sense of balance the game has had with regards to its powers or the impossible to solo qlithopic warzone designed to make healers required, and the mostly rotten community.

Of course now cryptic is being disolved into DECA, with cryptic employees seeking work elsewhere now, only with cryptic for a short time until they find another position. This is effecting STO, to(In fact it was an STO player who first caught the pieces and put things together, such as no cryptic positions open directly, only DECA games positions for cryptic games with no mention of cryptic itself many cryptic devs including the absolute top now putting up as available for work ect).

February 27

On 2/25/2024 at 1:43 PM, Maelwys said:

Which would imply very little has actually changed in terms of the average number of times a foe will find itself knocked on its back over the duration of a bonfire patch... which is in line with my testing! 🍻
It also helps explain some of the disgruntled Fire Controller/Dominator comments we've been seeing here since there'd now be a halved chance for Bonfire to immediately KD a group of Foes upon casting (albeit a much better chance for it to snag a foe that enters the patch for less than 2 seconds!). However 1 second after that initial spike it immediately evens out; and if anything the Knockdown rate over time has become a bit less streaky.

Factoring in the Activation Rate definitely looks like what I was missing above; since Whirlwind and Repel both have an activation rate of 0.5s to Bonfire's 1s.
That also suggests the patch might technically be a buff to Bonfire's KB rate if you're not slotting it with a KB>KD IO... (140% KB chance every 2s vs 120% KB chance every 1s?)

...I'm still annoyed about the reduced radius in the Epic Pool version of Bonfire, but at least they're reverting the duration nerf (hurrah!) and testing has proven that I can get largely the same effect as before by simply casting Fireball (albeit slotted with Ragnarok and Superior Frozen Blast Procs...) more often! 🤣

.2 * 2 isn't actually 40%, thats a gamblers falacy. Its more like 36%. (you calculate the chance of it NOT happening first, so .8 * .8 = .64, you take that and subtract it from 1 and thats your actual percentage, even then it'll be significantly more unreliable). Even so, odds are it'll probably still be useful for zoning them a little on my water blaster when I get around to her.

February 27

On 2/26/2024 at 5:28 AM, TygerDarkstorm said:

I'm just going to mention that you will see +4's even on a +3 setting; that's how the game works, even when you play at +0. At +0 some enemies will con even to you, and some will con one level over you. That doesn't change just because you upped the difficulty settings.

I know I'll see +4's on the game when you set at +3. Didn't need to reply to that on this, I only mentioned +4's spawning to also include that I also got a taste of what they'd be like on +4 so people wouldn't assume that I couldn't handle them at +3, it was +4 that gave me trouble on the blaster.

My stalker handled the new council relatively easy compared to my ice blaster, in fact she managed to clear the map faster than the ice blaster simply due to having far superior single-target DPS, as thats what you need to deal with the dark warwolfs, they are so tanky that the AoE power advantage blasters have is completely negated, and the blasters having lower ST than scrappers and stalkers ultimately causes them to fall behind the stalker I had (who to be fair had decent AoE as a Dual blades stalker). This was including the +4's that are in the map.

February 25

3 minutes ago, Uun said:

BTW, it appears that they attached this tag to other powers not mentioned in the patch notes, including Force Field/Repulsion Field, Kinetics/Repel, Storm/Tornado, Storm Blast/Jet Stream and Singularity/Repel.

https://cod.uberguy.net/html/tags.html?tag=reduceifkd&q=bears

This is, beyond words, cruel. Like Cyptic nerfing everything not-healing in CO cruel.

February 25

On 2/21/2024 at 7:01 PM, Neuronia said:

Finished a 1* LGTF a few hours ago and it's so fun. A lot less annoying than ITF with the Nictus possessions and stuff. A lot of the stuff is avoidable and rewards team play and the new dialogue/cut scenes/map architecture is sublime. You have done very well, this is VIP level content under the old system and we're just getting it so....thank you very much!

I'll have to give it a try sometime then, as the hard-mode ITF and nictus possession, things feeling unavoidable was a major quit moment for me when it comes to hard mode content, I played hard mode ITF once and then never touched it again after that. Although it was also the cysts blowing up 1-shotting my bio armor stalker who actually wasn't fully incarnated out and only half IO'd (still 50), that wasn't the best idea, but it made me feel I had to bring toons in who were 100% perfect to do any hard mode content after that, and by the time I had more i felt were ready everyone was only doing 4* with barrier stacking on all toons.

February 25

Finally got around to fighting the new council, I liked the galaxy ones but I hated the dark eclipse archons, they res and the holds from my ice powers weren't working half the time, and it seemed like they had an auto-hit attack, died twice in one mission on 8x+3 solo (though the game put +4's and those were the ones that defeated me.) on effectively the same mob. On a toon with every IO with as much defense as I could stack in every category, barrier, Inner will ect and still said blaster couldn't keep alive effectively. I ended up putting in an extra kb protection IO before continuing. Maybe I should have tested this all on beta or something.

An auto hit attack.....that hits hard as heck. RIP defense users I guess.

The other things I liked, I also fought the CoT 8x+2 solo, they seemed a lot more fun as I simply had to react and watch that I was attacking the right mobs. Though it wa sa cave and the mobs were rather scattered, though I don't try to fight in tar patches/quakes ect either. Honestly they seem to be likely easier simply due to not having auto-hit abilities. I like they got equivilants of Ruin, Madness and Agony mages(and nice touch with the huge explode power on near defeat, make me keep a distance).

CoT = fun to fight again(so far anyways), mobs debuff/cc patches is a nice touch so far as it can be moved out of(or teleport out of if immobed/slowed ect), I can react to them and they react to me, its fun.
Council = Why do they have to have an auto-hit attack? Wasn't it bad enough Ralaruu had auto-hit mobs in abundance? I mean do we really want them to be ludicrously hard now I dunno, I wasn't having fun fighting council once I moved from +2 to +3(and the game tossed +4's at me). Simply the fact that the vampire archons are always going to turn into super warwolves(all of them in the entire map did this to me by the way), and seem to have extra high resistance to holds and can auto-hit occasionally before they turn, not very soloable anymore unless your stacked with dark resists. At least, thats how I'm left feeling about it anyways. I felt like it was all luck in the end and keeping a distance from the enemies so they don't auto-hit on me.

February 25

On 2/21/2024 at 12:44 AM, nihilii said:

Granite tank on SOs, facing slows. I was better off NOT knowing how long my powers take to recharge!

I was playin with timers for a long time now, so I'm used to these scenes of horror from cooldown reduction debuffs :D. But I love it since on some of my toons I can perfectly time my BU + Aim + nukes on my blaster(I want both fired off just at the tenth of a second the tier 9 nuke is ready, so its off as much as humanly possible so I can win that DPS race I do as a means of making myself better at this game).

Welcome to my world! But don't worry though its only if they actually land em on ya.

February 25

Haven't played much since the update (rimworld, yeah, i'm addicted to that game) but I had already respecced my widow. But I will have to see how my two maxed blasters do. I was indestructible on them before the patch(then again I always make my toons tankier, rather than just loading up on damage procs like everyone under the sun). Though its also my play, I'm always watching every single power enemies use and I'm never satisfied until I'm soloing the mobs again :D.

Maybe i'll run the water blaster first with it, since she has rise of the phoenix, which to me is effectively a free nuke and extra health bar, it even recharges super fast on Alma :D. If not then it'll have to be the widow just to be sure the team has more force multipliers.

February 3

8 hours ago, Laucianna said:

If it's simple for the devs to add, sounds like a nice idea for some extra badges though as I 100% seeing people advertise these, the only problem would be if some TF/SFs have super large maps where it would take far too long to be realistic ❤️

Hence the idea is the badges are more like challenge badges than anything. Not really intended for casual players as much.

February 3

3 hours ago, Greycat said:

You're already getting an extra reward - extra INF (assuming you're not running a 2xp booster, which gives XP instead of INF,) extra XP, extra salvage and other drops, and if the mobs are ones with defeat progress, more progress towards those badges.

And even more "no" towards "n33d my l337 sh1n3y" restrictions.

Not trying to be elitist on it, just thought it'd be nice if there was more incentive is all, I mean they are adding more incentive to mix team roles a bit, why not more incentive for map clearing to? As for the 8x, that was so people wouldn't just set the mob counter or smallest team allowed for quickest obtaining of said badges, more than anything. *Shrug*

February 3

Oh yeah, credit should only be if the difficulty is at 8x. Maybe even 8x+1 through up to 8x+4 or maybe just make it hard mode exclusive.

February 3

What it says on the title. Badges or extra rewards for 100% defeats, as in absolute, 100% defeat everything in every map in a task force. Even timed missions. Guild wars had something similar, the "Vanquisher" rewards for wiping the entire map on its hard difficulty, so why not something like that for CoH and the missions in task forces?

I only also suggest this as I admit I enjoy kill most ITF's and also like to clear entire maps of mobs in missions. Also, I'd noticed in task forces sometimes people are speed running even when they say they are running a "Normal run". Unfortunately, that later one annoys me to an extreme. If I wanted a speed run i'd have joined or form a team FOR a speed run.

How about also another idea: Completion scoreboard. On mission completion, a scoreboard shows up on how much time was spent on mission, how many enemies missed ect. Because, why not?

February 3

7 hours ago, BlakeTheDrake said:

I skipped suppressive fire since it's a hold, and I was desperate for more damage... but my impression may be mistaken. Perhaps I'll try a respec.

As for all this, though, you're missing my perspective. Suppose your FIRST character on the server is a Dual Pistol Sentinel, because oooh, new archetype! Oooh, dual-wielding handguns! Coool... and as a Blaster with Extra Defense, the Sentinel certainly LOOKS perfectly solo-capable - indeed it IS, with most other main powersets. The character creation interface TELLS you that it's capable of running solo, and terms it as a 'Ranged Damage' class, not support.

Now suppose you picked the 'Praetorian' starting option because oooh, a whole new SIDE!

Yeah, good luck getting a team together over there with any kind of regularity. And you don't have a higher-level alt who can fund you. Sure, you can just roll up another character, on blueside, and play them up to high levels, then use them to 'fund' your Sentinel and get it maxed-out SOs in order to compensate for the weakness of its attacks... which is exactly what I've done, and I'm having a blast with my Level 50 Mastermind, and several other characters in the 20's and 30's. Does that really detract from my point, though? If you need to do that, there's something wrong with the powerset.

But, I restate once again: There's nothing wrong with the set as a primary for CORRUPTORS. Or a secondary for Defenders. With those classes, you're going to be team-focused regardless, so the debuffs and AoE that Dual Pistols offer are a fine match. It's just a poor match for the Blaster or Sentinel, especially since there's nothing that, at a glance, tells you that "This powerset will turn you into a team-focused pseudo-support instead of a primary DPS."

You picked praetorian side as a new player? Yeah they are putting in a warning in the upcoming update about that. Gold side is very, very hard compared to blue/red side. I often say its for experts only who know well in advance high strength powerset combinations.

I get it a bit not all sets are equal, Dual pistols IS a middle-performer overall atm, due to activation time flows. Dual pistols though isn't a "late bloomer" and you did reply about the hold power, yes, never, EVER dismiss a power in a set especially if your using it for the first time. Theres often what we call "hidden gems" in some power sets on some classes. Dual pistols suppressive fire on sentinels is one of those. After you've hit higher levels then you get a feel for the chains and whats effective/skippable and can respec and fine tune a build to get more out of the set combination.

Also, holds can prevent a TON of damage even if they are low damage, they are great for applying "Active defense"; defensive measures that cripple/disable enemies through cc effects and raw debuffs. Ice blasters know this all to well, they rely almost exclusively on active defense to survive; both the holds are the powersets most powerful attack and blizzard debuffs to-hit.

In fact, hardest experience is to play a support class gold side, I even started a support toon there and had to specifically build for it to get through.

Also, sentinels are not blasters with extra defense, but blasters who sacrifice the high damage melee/utility secondary for a defense set. Sentinels lose a lot of damage and often utility that can include holds for that, ironicly, they get attacked more compared to a blaster who also uses the melee attacks and so defeats the enemies quicker or cripples them so they get attacked even less. I actually found sentinels are very strong WITH DP, though, and is potentially brutal with defense-focused secondaries thanks to luck of the gambler later, you can then simply load up on procs in DP attacks with reckless abandonment, have high defense AND high proc damage with very solid global recharge.

February 2

3 hours ago, arcane said:

I just think it’s a rather fruitless exercise once you’ve acknowledged that everyone and everything sucks before 50+1. Pointing out that a set/build is struggling prior to that is just pointing out that the sky is blue.

It's not so much that but knowing what your getting at each level range and how to make the most of it:

Assuming NOT playing in +4 teams such as PI 54 or AE:

1-15: Assuming you get enhancements yeah, your at DO's likely. Beginners luck runs out around 20 but the base bonus accuracy helps. Low damage due to not being able to slot properly. ALL powersets suck at this point. Your main talents are not fully online 'yet'. Usually you end up taking both tier 1 and 2 powers if your concerned about power here.

15-22: The crunch, still on crappy enhancements, enemies are getting a bit tougher. Things are almost online, but not quite. Some sets don't come fully online yet, some do. DP is usually mostly online, barring its tier 9. Respeccing early 'here' isn't a bad idea necessarily if only to get rid of redundant attacks and tighten your slotting a little.
22-30: Everything looks spread thin or your loading all your damage abilities, saccing survivability on a sentinel. However, your overall build concept is "online" now, just underslotted. It only gets better from here. Respeccing into something comparable to the final build becomes very viable if you have it fully planned out in mids.
30-40: Slotting finally fills out to be reasonable, still not IO'd but at least now your seeing a significant power increase.

40-50: Build becomes even more powerful due to slotting, tertiary/filler powers such as leadership/fighting is taken depending on what hasn't been taken already.

50+1: Your able to contribute to 54 teams efficiently regardless of archtype, your damage effectively doubles over sidekicked to 49 due to going from fighting -5 vs your enemies to only -3. And course other incarnate powers. And no need to slot new enhancements/replace SO's and so your able to start thinking about full sets or proc spamming.

There IS a major power curve here that EVERYONE goes through, even the most powerful sets and set combinations experience this. I think only support classes can see a significant improvement in overall power contribution at the lower levels, including the VEATS. Non support classes and tanks generally depend entirely on themselves for there performance, and so aren't as able to contribute to a team as much, but are more effective solo compared to support. But its also down to WHERE you put what slots you have to work with, some builds are weaker at lower levels than others and sometimes making a build with low levels in mind, if even only temporary, isn't a bad idea to account for that.

February 2

19 minutes ago, Riverdusk said:

Just to be sure, you have tried using Suppressive Fire with either fire or ice ammo? (doable by level 8). Do so and it is a pretty fast recharging and hard hitting attack. If you are skipping it or trying to use it with standard ammo (or even toxic ammo) I could understand your perceptions. The damage info shown for the power can be misleading and its a weird power the way it works.

I second this, suppressive fire is very, very good on a sentinel when your using fire/ice ammo. In fact, superior on a sentinel over the other ranged archtypes if I remember right.

February 2

3 hours ago, BlakeTheDrake said:

All good points, and I can't claim to have tried every Blast-set... perhaps I'm prejudiced by my own experiences, but it's worth keeping in mind that most of my problem with the set is that the EARLY LEVELS are an absolute slog to SOLO because of the lack of single-target damage. You've got two good AoEs, but those only come into their own on larger teams, and are bog useless when you're just fighting a single Lieutenant. It really does wind up feeling like you grabbed a BB-gun by mistake in those cases.

Things such as slotting for lots of procs, or using specific sets, aren't helpful to a character that's struggling to reach level 18 and get the Executioner's Shot. Especially not if you don't have some high-level alt who can donate resources.

Now, here's the thing... having played a Dual Pistols Sentinel to Level 15, I know in my heart that I'm doing the vast majority of my damage with the Premium Attack Powers, rather than my actual powerset. Do I have hard numbers and reams of data to back that up? Nope. Could I get it? Maybe. Will I? Heck no. Because it doesn't matter. What matters is that the set feels weak. That it feels frustrating and slow to play when soloing - which, depending on what 'side' you start on, you may have to do a lot of! Even if some spreadsheet was pulled up to demonstrate that I'm wrong, and that the guns actually deal perfectly decent damage... that doesn't change that feeling, nor does it make that character any more fun to play. At most, it suggests that there are different measures that needs to be taken to make the set feel more powerful.

In the end, you can only exist in your own, subjective reality, viewing the world through your own eyes and nobody else's. If the same liquid tastes better to you in a Coca-Cola bottle than a store-brand cola-bottle, then it tastes better - even if they are manufactured wholesale by your brain, the results remain.

Firstly, you've only leveled up to 15, you don't even have SO-enhancements(or equivilent IOs) yet. And not to mention procs if you decide to use them. Also why not play a different character to level 50, save up a ton of influence and then transfer it to the struggling DP toon? Even then though, why are you playing solo all the time? Teaming gets you more experience/hour and if you wanna solo the archs consider using Ouroboros to play them after you've leveled up a bunch. AND teams can provide things like buffs to make up for your weaknesses until your high enough level to hold your own.

I mean my first 50 on homecoming was a DP/Time manipulation corruptor, and I had no major difficulty, because teamwork. I played in teams and debuffed everything in my path, I used PBU to boost farsight(and also sometimes hail of bullets) and make myself and allies ridiculously tough. Build would probably be even stronger today than back then, in fact. And in fact i'm starting, of all things, a DP/devices blaster to lately.

I also maxed out a DP/bio sentinel to, and found it rather fun, and probably stronger now due to the sentinel buff. She wasn't the highest damage but her staying power was amazing, I almost never went down when I was leveling her.

If it still feels like you have problems perhaps reroll a different powerset or archtype. Honestly, your judging the powerset far to soon, level 15 is again very, very week, most sets are rather weak at that level range. Some just more than others(looking at you SR on scrapper/stalker). Either level it up some more OR try something else.

Honestly? If your going for solo play, i'd recommend scrapper if your new to the game, rather than sentinel. Many scrapper sets have far higher raw DPS, good burst, and also scrapper secondaries most mature rather quickly(but i'd ask a little on this maybe, some like super reflexes aren't fully online all the way until level 28 on a scrapper, but Bio armor and radiation armor are both very good even at low levels). Sentinel is far more a niche archtype, it can be great, granted, though it struggles with sets that depend on procs or higher levels to feel fully online compared to the other ranged archtypes.

Sign In

Profiles

Forums

Events

Store

Articles

Patch Notes

Posts posted by DrunkFlux