Jump to content
Hotmail and Outlook are blocking most of our emails at the moment. Please use an alternative provider when registering if possible until the issue is resolved.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sources disagree on PPM area factor formula. Old dev posts on Paragonwiki say one way, SCoRE source code and @Bopper's spreadsheets say another way, an i24 change according to Bopper. Same sources disagree whether the final chance is clamped to a minimum nonzero floor.

 

So I ran two hour-long experiments with a level 50 ice/ice dominator on HC test server to confirm which sources are correct for HC.

 

Experiment 1 - Unenhanced

 

Frostbite with no recharge enhancements and a Trap of the Hunter proc.

Observed: 240 procs in 1673 hits

i23 Predicted: 5.5 area factor, 10.68% proc frequency

i24 Predicted: 4.375 area factor, 13.43% proc frequency

 

Binomial test on observed frequency gives z=4.81 compared to i23, z=1.06 compared to i24. 5.5 area factor is definitely wrong, 4.375 area factor could be right.

 

Experimental 2 - Enhanced

 

Frostbite with way too many recharge enhancements, a spiritual core paragon alpha, and a Trap of the Hunter proc.

Observed: 305 procs in 3161 hits

i23 No Clamp Predicted: 5.56% proc frequency

i24 No Clamp Predicted: 6.99% proc frequency

Clamp Predicted: 3.5 PPM, minimum 10.25% proc frequency

 

Binomial test on observed frequency gives z=9,99 compared to i23 no clamp, z=5.83 compared to i24 no clamp, z=-1.09 compared to clamp. No clamp is definitely wrong, 10.25% clamp could be right.

enhanced-setup.jpeg

unenhanced-setup.jpeg

enhanced-log.txt.zip unenhanced-log.txt.zip

×
×
  • Create New...