Jump to content
Hotmail and Outlook are blocking most of our emails at the moment. Please use an alternative provider when registering if possible until the issue is resolved.

Recommended Posts

Posted

As someone who was a developer on another game (much smaller), the devs would take input from the players.  Sometimes it would be some offhand comment about something else that would morph into a different feature.   Sometimes it would just be the reinforcement of an idea that one already had, sometimes it would wind up as a modification.  Creativity takes a lot of different inputs.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I like this:

 

35 minutes ago, lemming said:

As someone who was a developer on another game (much smaller), the devs would take input from the players.  Sometimes it would be some offhand comment about something else that would morph into a different feature.   Sometimes it would just be the reinforcement of an idea that one already had, sometimes it would wind up as a modification.  Creativity takes a lot of different inputs.

 

I think there is some sort of cognitive disconnect when thinking:

(1) Eliminating/restricting other critical user feedback because critical feedback is bad for a suggestion, and

(2) A development team is more likely to implement a suggestion that gets no critical user feedback (maybe because the Devs would take feedback in Beta? *1). 

 

Unless somebody believes that the devs are going to (eventually) implement 100% of all suggestions that only have an absence of (negative) critical feedback, asking to restrict feedback on publicly shared ideas would be an example of narcissistic behavior.

 

(*1) We have had (on HC) a small number of cases where the HC team implemented something that generated a reaction of "Who asked for that?" and/or "How did that slip in?"... in other words: negative critical reactions. Some were rolled back, some were not. For the huge number of player-made suggestions, I'd prefer some discourse happen before anyone touches the code.

 

EDIT: The first example of a rolled-back change that comes to mind was the "rolling alignment tips" that would pour in. The obvious "problem" being solved was "what if a player doesn't want the morality tips they have?"... which on its face could be an issue for some players. In practice, players can of course buy any (level-restricted) morality mission they want... and the rolling solution was simply flooding players with notifications and eliminating morality missions that they may have wanted to keep. 

Edited by tidge
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...