FFFF
-
Posts
180 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Articles
Patch Notes
Posts posted by FFFF
-
-
Must color coordinate power tray!
-
This bothers more every time I look at it...
-
1
-
-
-
8
-
1
-
5
-
-
Only one has a dish named after him so therefore he must be the most superior.
-
1
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, Scarlet Shocker said:
Who gets to decide?
I think skill is a relative metric.
Truthfully I don't actually care so long as I am skilled enough to complete the relevant task set and enjoy the game.
This is all self-rated, so yeah pretty relative.
What prompted this was a recent TF I joined and there was a DM scrapper that was just amazing lining up his cones. Also had really good situational awareness. Used a ranged attack to pull a mob off of one of squishier teammates. And seemed to beat everyone to the mission door using only super speed. I think I’m pretty good, but I wasn’t as good as that dude.
Edit: ratings are just for funsies
-
So first off, I think City of Heroes is a pretty accessible game and has a low floor for being proficient at it. Reading the tutorial information gives you most of what you need, and experimentation plus Google can get you the rest of it. However, there are definitely areas of skill in this game.
- Movement skills - this can be everything from perfectly landing a super jump to avoid the "lava" to being able to line up mobs so that AoE cone can hit all targets. Some players are very good a this.
- Leading task forces/raids - I'm not talking about just getting them done, but doing them rather efficiently or at the various challenge levels. Sure, familiarity can compensate here, but I think an understanding of game mechanics, how certain encounters work, what powers are needed, etc. is skill based.
- Character builds - some players are really good at min-maxing builds, some are not. It's interesting to me that the meta for this has changed somewhat. With access to pretty much any IO and with the full incarnate system available, players build as much for damage (heavily using procs) as they do for various defense caps and recharge.
- Badging - getting exploration or plaque badges require almost no skill, but some of the defeat and achievement badges requires a pretty good understanding of where to make headway in that badge efficiently.
- Key binds - there are a lot of binds and macros that make the frustrating into the simple. Mastermind binds by themselves can elevate an entire AT's effectiveness. Binds for finding hard-to-find glowies or hostages make frustrating missions potentially a lot easier.
- In-game knowledge - most of this feels like familiarity instead of actual skill, but knowing where things are and what can be done in certain situations is definitely skill. For someone like me who left several issues before the live game went end of life, I'm amazed at the pieces of information I don't have (e.g., I had never seen Kallisti Wharf until yesterday). This also shows up in the ability to make innovative and original costumes.
So how do I rate myself?
- Movement - 3/5 (still stymied by CoT cake layer cave)
- Leading task forces/raids - 1/5 (I've forgotten too much, and am completely unfamiliar with newer content, challenge ratings, new power sets)
- Character builds - 4/5 (I build mostly old school style circa 2012, but I've adapted pretty nicely I think)
- Badging - 2/5 (mostly owing to Google)
- Key binds - 0/5 (sadly I'm too lazy to use key binds on most of my characters to my obvious detriment)
- In-game knowledge - 2/5 (anything issue 19 or older, no idea; I've also forgotten a ton)
-
1
-
15 hours ago, drgantz said:
In the early days, there was a mission that awarded a badge. To get this mission, you had to do a specific mission chain. Some people would miss this chain, and then offer 900K Infl for that mission. I would make a new toon, do that mission chain, and then wait for someone to make a chat announcement that he was offering infl for that mission.
Then - Profit!
Save the Fortune Teller (Spelunker badge). It's a badge that is necessary for the Atlas Medallion accolade. It's super easy to miss especially if you're teaming a lot on low levels. It's not so annoying anymore due to Ouro.
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, UltraAlt said:
@FFFF feel free to play the game any way that you like.
If you feel that IO availability has broken the system because they are too available, simply don't purchase and slot the ones that you feel are OP.
Can you make other players do that?
No. They are playing the game the way they want to play within the boundaries that the DEVs have set-up around us.
I'm not telling anyone how they should play. I'm simply pointing out one of the reasons why the game feels unbalanced to some. No game goes out of its way to provide every player the top of the line gear this easily. With that said, this is a nostalgia game so who cares, right?
I agree with Yomo above that the djinni has been let out of the bottle already.
-
I like Inventions. I think they add depth and complexity to an otherwise bland itemization system. I also appreciate that they allow for further customization of your character.
I've seen a number of threads stating that IOs break the balance of the game. In its current implementation, I would agree. However, the game breaking part of them is how easily they are acquired. Back on live, the Miracle proc, the Numina proc would be tens of millions of influence. The Gladiator Armor Defense / TP protection was around a billion influence. PvP IOs were also extremely scarce due to them being loot that fell when in PvP zones.
In other games, your character doesn't have access to legendary gear at the ridiculously low cost of 5 million influence (the price I bought a Luck of the Gambler / Global Recharge IO yesterday). In an extreme example, in classic WoW, you may have to wait weeks and constantly raid to get a specific piece of gear that would allow you to progress. Scarcity, cost, progression are all barriers in other games that limit access to the most powerful gear. In our current state, the most powerful gear in the game is so easily available that we see complaints about how it trivializes content.
In addition, because you can buy the very best, why settle for second best? There are some invention sets that just go completely ignored because your average player can afford to go top tier immediately. Many of the second tier sets don't have the game-breaking bonuses top tier ones do. Would anyone object to someone getting 4% regeneration or 1.5% endurance recovery? On live, I remember waiting on the availability of certain scarce IOs/recipes but mostly settling on builds that factored in affordability as much as function. I don't think it's a bad situation to have some more second tier sets get more use.
I think like many of you, I'd like to see game difficulty better balanced. At the highest levels, support ATs are often unneeded and the availability of top-tier IOs + Incarnate abilities have made tank-mage characters more prevalent. However, I think balancing discussions that don't factor economics, scarcity and perhaps gates on certain materials are not the way to go. It's not enough to simply add higher difficulty modes. Nor do I advocate raw global changes like buffing all enemy hit points or damage. I think scarcity made the live game more balanced and the current economic implementation broke it.
-
3
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, MoonSheep said:
IOs have ruined CoH and were a mistake.
they introduced a materially significant increase in character strength without the game responding by increasing enemy strength or difficulty
IOs have allowed people to reject teamplay and solo everything in the game - this has led to the demise of support and control ATs which aren’t needed or valued
IOs were a response to enhancement diversification, arguably the most drastic nerf implemented in the game (though the lesser known global defense nerf may actually been worse). In my experience, IO-based characters still had to rely on support characters from when they were introduced (issue 8?) all the way to issue 19 when the Incarnate system was introduced. At least that was my experience during the live servers era.
Would you say that pre-Incarnate teams in the game today still don't require support characters? I suspect it's the Incarnate system that ultimately tips the scale. Though there's a lot of things that make the base Homecoming character way stronger than when they were on live. At the top of my head:
- SOs available at level 1
- Mezzes not dropping toggles
- Inherent fitness (more power choices, and stamina/health at level 1)
- All the P2W items
While I agree with your premise that there is a material increase in character strength without commensurate increase in game difficulty, I don't think the issue is strictly an issue with Inventions.
-
1
-
On 9/18/2023 at 2:22 PM, Without_Pause said:
Rocky Road has been second tier for me. I should have it again though.
1. Peanut Butter Cup. Prefer Chocolate ice cream with Peanut Butter.
2. Sea Salt Caramel.
3. Blue Moon. Regional to the Great Lakes area. It tends to be the blue stuff in Superman ice cream. I've done it with Rock 'n' Rye pop and called it a Pure Michigan Float.
3. Mint Chocolate Chip. I've had way too much of this even if other flavors might be 'better.' Mint is just a great after meal flavor to have.
Honorable mentions. Pretty much any sort of tropical ice cream. That in the right setting is just divine. Vanilla ice cream, but like vanilla bean type where the vanilla is rather pronounced. Plus, vanilla is just so versatile as it works so well with cake, pie, and floats. Americone Dream. I don't understand why they just didn't add in the nuts. One of the only celebrity items that I actually genuinely like. Butter Pecan. Honestly, they could get rid of the pecans and I would be happy. There are like a ton of others, but those stand out right now.
Back on topic, I've been playing Claws and EA via two ATs, and really liking my Ill/dark.
I'm in Portland, home of Salt n Straw, and able to partake some extraordinary flavors:
Salted Malted Chocolate Chip Cooke Dough
Strawberry Honey Balsamic with Black Pepper
Honey Lavander
Pear and Blue Cheese
While I like all of the above, I usually settle for Double Fold Vanilla (their house vanilla) or their Sea Salt with Caramel Ribbons (their house Sea Salt Caramel)
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Psyonico said:
To my knowledge, the holy Trinity was never "needed" in CoH. Mind you, I started in i6, so I don't know about the early days, but with the exception of fringe content, healers always took a back seat to (de)buffers, which is not the way a Trinity game works.
Additionally, and someone who was around before me can correct me if I'm wrong, controllers used to be able to lock down every spawn with their AoE hold, then Jack decided people didn't like playing City of Statues and AoE holds got their durations and recharges nerfed.
Tankers used to herd entire maps, that wasn't because of healers.
Agree. In fact, in many situations, it was suboptimal. You would really miss that rad defender if facing a tough AV.
-
2
-
1
-
-
Back in the day, I used to go out of my way to avoid players advertising themselves as a "healer". It told me that you didn't know how to play your AT. After multiple team ups with Empathy defenders who only took their heals and skipped out of Fortitude and Clear Mind, I only played with Empaths who I knew personally. It wasn't just Empaths either. Worst was a Rad defender who only had their area heal and the full medicine pool.
I like that you can use a lot of different combinations of ATs to put together a successful team. I like you have hybrid ATs like Warshades, Masterminds, Fortunatas, etc. Some of my best experiences (and I think this goes for a lot of vets) is when an oddball mishmash of characters synergizes so well that they smash through content.
I think you have some points that the game difficulty needs to be adjusted to create more utilization of support ATs and that power creep has trivialized what used to be hard content. However, where you and I disagree is that I don't think bringing back dependence on the trinity is the solution for the problems you mention.
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
-
Great topic!
- Respec missions used to be so hard! The mission itself wasn't that tough, but the folks who often showed up on that mission often had gimped builds. I had a Force Field Defender with Medicine pool which I used to help a lot players through that mission. And even with that I think I still failed about 20% of the time.
- Hami-Os used to be the bees knees. True end game gear especially since Hami raids early on would fail a fair amount of the time.
- I remember when capes were announced! For the graphics capability of the day, I thought they looked great, clipping issues aside.
- Pre-travel suppression / non-diminishing returns PvP was really fun. It was completely unbalanced and had it's very own meta, typically blasters with an emp defender. It was obvious that many powers, range vs. melee, hit points, defense, tohit, debuffs, etc. were mechanics that were never devised with PvP in mind. It was flawed, but fun. Should have never been introduced in the game in that state.
- Putting badges in PvP zones...probably the most drama inducing thing that old devs could have done. A terrible idea that pitted two fervent communities against each other.
- Sappers were really fearsome back in the day. Pretty overpowered and could single-handedly cause entire team wipes.
- I loved manning a tank or a /rad controller and helping someone past the AVs in the Tina Macintyre or Maria Jenkins missions. Really felt like a hero.
- I loved the utter domination of all defender or controller teams. I've always liked that CoH didn't adhere to the strict tank-healer-dps trinity.
- I remember when AR/Dev blasters and Fire Tanks were meta. Then people discovered regen scrappers and fire controllers.
- Invulnerability used to be awful causing a character to be rooted in place. People still picked it because they wanted it to pair with Super Strength and be Superman.
- Post-ED blasters were really bad. I remember respec'ing one of mine and discovered that blasts wouldn't one-shot most minions. Post-ED tanks were almost as bad.
- Early game, the devs purposely obfuscated how powers actually worked. Frustratingly you only saw descriptions of high or severe damage, stuff like that. I remember the grassroots efforts to start cataloguing activation times and to better understand attack chains. How defense really worked (no one understood that 45% soft cap until player testing revealed it), resistance caps, stealth, tohit, or other significant game mechanics. I can say with certainty that most of the early players essentially played blind, picking suboptimal powers because a lot data was just hidden from us.
- I was blown away how popular badges became. I think CoH was one of the first games to implement them. I couldn't understand why some players obsessed with this particular metagame but I noticed that accomplishments/badges had proliferated and had become normalized in many other MMOs of that era.
- Sidekicking and Find Team functions, even at launch were pretty amazing. I remember being a level 16 fire tank who was invited to a level 30ish team mission. It was great to immediately access high level content. Fighting Crey with training and DOs though wasn't as great of an experience.
Thanks for indulging this trip through memory lane.
-
3
-
1
-
37 minutes ago, Oubliette_Red said:
According to one of the Devs, the way AE missions/arcs are created is not compatible with how the rest of the in-game content works. I'd already asked about this in a previous thread. It's too bad too, as there are some excellent AE creators out there working to build their arcs that live within the game's lore.
Regarding fixing mission arcs, I'd rather see Praetoria's contacts not put me on ignore should I happen to ding a level past their range. Which is all too easy. Shouldn't have to toggle XP throughout your entire run to avoid cutting out contacts and missing entire chains. 😞
That’s too bad. I was hoping for plug and play from AE to live. -
I'm using crowdsource referring to labor/effort, not monetary contributions. Just so there's no confusion here.
-
So I concede that developer resources are scant, and there are many things that may need to be fixed/updated before looking at old contacts, missions. I think new power sets and costume parts will be the priority for much of the current player base, along with bug fixes.
However, the old (think prior to City of Villains / Issue 6) missions feel really dated compared to other parts of the game. Compare a mission arc you get from Tunnel Rat in Praetoria versus what you'd get from say Tristan Caine. It leads to a bad player experience, particularly new players. You go from the exciting mission where you infiltrate the Skulls from Shauna Stockwell to Rescuing hard to find physicians from the Vahzilok. The disparity is jarring.
Is it possible we can help in some way? Is it possible to use AE to create new updates to missions, old story arcs, old missions, and have these made to replace the old stuff in the game. There's a lot of talent in the player base, and I think it would be great to see those talents applied to changing something that may never receive dev attention. I'm not particularly good with Mission Architect, but I'm willing to QA and play test. Also, given the fact that many contacts give out the same story arcs, there may not be as much to replace as we think. Further, I would love to see updates to certain contacts in the game. Among the most I'd love to see replaced: Steven Sheridan, Serafina and Unai Kemen.
Anyway, I'd appreciate any feedback for this idea/suggestion.
-
Edit: commented on the wrong AT
-
I'd only be up for increasing aggro limits if the associated penalties for it were increased. It's silly to see a tank herd up dozen of supposed supervillains completely scot free. This is just an idea but why not introduce some sort of scaling debuff that occurs when you aggro more than a certain limit? This would be something like a larger number of foes being able to hit gaps in your defenses just because of raw numbers. Probably not realistic for a game of this age, but an increase in aggro without a corresponding increase in risk seems like a bad overall idea.
-
1
-
-
Really agree with the OP.
Fighting overpowered god-like beings just feels overdone. I think the X-Men fight against the Sentinels is more engaging than fighting against Dark Phoenix. I prefer fights against the Legion of Doom versus fights against Darkseid. I want to play a superhero, not a godling. Fighting a supervillain group to prevent them getting their hands on a super weapon that can use to extort a nation (good); fighting a planet eater so the earth doesn't become the appetizer on his 7-course meal of galaxies ...ehhh.
If a lot of your new content is at that scale, fights against the Rogue Isles, Praetorians, Malta, etc. feels trivial, and sort of meaningless. Why stop a Praetorian conspiracy to replace key individuals with their Praetorian double if Rularuu is just going to end all dimensions next week?
With that said, I think a great example of where a global threat is realized and dealt with appropriately in-game is the fight against the Rikti. You have heroes and a whole division (Vanguard) formed to counter it. I think the story line is engaging and you really feel a part of something bigger without trivializing your contributions.
Just my opinion but I'd love to see a lot of new content in the sweet spot of level 35 - 49. This is when your character has almost all of their core powers and their build feels complete. The villains here are great and, in my opinion, underutilized. So more Malta, Carnival, Nemesis, Crey, etc. I'd love to see the game incentivize playing through these levels and not zipping past them as a road bump to incarnate content.
-
On 6/16/2023 at 11:20 AM, GuardianSaint said:
I've been meaning to give this combo a try. I have never tried martial combat, and was wondering if anyone has tried it (especially with fire blast) and would be willing to offer some advice. I did a bit of reading and searching on this forum, and it seems that martial offers some decent utility as well as some nice melee combat options, but a lot of that information is a few years old and I was not sure if there had been changes that would not be reflected in posts from four years ago. Any opinions about must-have powers in the secondary? Also, what would you chase as far as set bonuses?
On 6/16/2023 at 11:20 AM, GuardianSaint said:I’m leveling up mine slowly via story arcs and just hit level 31. Highly recommend the pairing. Fire blast is solid and martial is such a well constructed secondary.
-
Had a female character on live, a former priestess from another galaxy named Three Holes.
I had this elaborate backstory, even a fairly detailed religion based on the concepts of fullness and emptiness.
Made it to level 24 before I got my first snarky tell full of sexual innuendos. OMG! I had completely missed the trees for the forest. I logged off and just deleted the character out of sheer embarrassment.
-
1
-
2
-
-
So I dropped COH back in the day, around issue 19. Incarnates were just announced, inherent fitness was not a thing and mez effects would instantly drop toggles, mostly meaning a swift death sentence on most squishies. Annoyed with this, I played only characters which either had mez protection or where it wasn’t as large of a factor (i.e., Masterminds).
I hadn’t picked up a blaster for probably 15 years. For some reasons my current scrapper experiments weren’t working out so I decided on a Fire/Martial character.
Wow. Blasters just rule. It’s been such a silky smooth leveling experience that it’s causing dissonance from what I remember. I remember blasters being fun but frustrating.
Mez effects seem not as bad. My character is almost always fighting from hover and even slept or held, no problem. She stays up and then keeps shooting (hover is even decently fast!) Having stamina at level 1, access to SOs right from the beginning, etc. has largely mitigated most of the early blaster issues. Sure, I’ve been defeated a couple of times but in each case, completely avoidable if I decided to play more conservatively.
I’m eager to try another blaster, but after I get my current one to 50. I wonder how many old vets still retain their old biases from Live. I know I do. The game is the same but it’s not.
-
25 minutes ago, Darmian said:
Gold is fabulous. This time when you hit 20, try going straight to First Ward instead of taking the Rift mission. More Praetoria!
Did not know we could do that. Mind blown.
-
1
-
OCD!
in General Discussion
Posted
Ugh, they are not! The Acc/Dmg enhancement is in the second spot! What was I thinking?!?