Jump to content

@Fiercefield

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by @Fiercefield

  1. This is a list of people who don't get the point of what I wrote. I'll spell it out: Scenario 1: Player A would like the volunteer devs to use their limited free time to cater new features towards their preferred playstyle, which happens to be PVE. - According to responses, this player is a mean-spirited a-hole. Scenario 2: Player B would like the volunteer devs to use their limited free time to cater new features towards their preferred playstyle, which happens to be PVP. - This player is not a mean-spirited a-hole... because...
  2. Personally, I'd rather see the devs disable PVP altogether and repurpose the PVP zones into containing new story arcs and content for level 50 players. Disadvantage: A minority who like to PVP no longer can. Advantage: The majority who don't like to PVP get new content with the devs not needing to create entirely new zones, only new story arcs and mission interiors.
  3. But wait a minute, I've always heard from Mac users that Macs are superior to PCs... what you're telling me doesn't make any sense. #cheapshot Sorry. Genuinely sorry that's happening to you. Please forgive the shot, I have to get my jabs in where I can. My roommate is just "Mac Mac Mac Mac MAAAAC" all day long.
  4. You don't have to toggle your XP on and off regularly. Turn it off at every level which ends in a 4 or a 9, until you've totally run out of all available missions from all possible contacts. Then you turn it on again, and level up whatever way you choose to the next level which ends in a 4 or a 9, and then turn it off again.
  5. I have three of them, but the AT is very clunky until about 30 due to needing a large number of powers in order to really become fun. Prior to then, there's a lot of having to choose between loading up on attacks versus loading up on defenses, and so it feels sometimes like either being a gimpy blaster if you focus on a lot of attacks over defense, or, you're killing things very slowly if you go for defense over offense. But you eventually reach a sweet spot with powers where you have a good selection of both and you're shining.
  6. If you have 45%, then all else being baseline, you will get hit about 5% of the time. If you have 40%, then all else being baseline, you will get hit about 10% of the time. So you'll take twice as much damage. Rough estimate.
  7. Whoa, that’s quite a claim, folks. Um, no. Enlarging the shitty caves maps is not “remaking the entire game.” Quoted out of context. Read the entire message.
  8. I feel like most of the map sets in the game are unnecessarily maze-like and over-complicated, but as somebody else said, it's a real rabbit hole if changes start being made to one map set, because then they'd just about need to examine every single map set and revise them, which also means redoing every single mission which uses that map set to make sure that the enemy spawn points didn't get broken, to make sure that the doorways still line up properly, and so on. They'd almost be remaking the entire game at that point.
  9. I mean, if the community want to designate an "unofficial bigots server", as a place for players who are discriminatory to have as their "safe space" where they can pretend that it's not 2019 and they can pretend their backwards ideas have any merit, that'd be fine. Then all of the people who can't be decent and respectful to other humans can go there and be crappy to each other while the rest of us have fun on all of the other servers.
  10. I don't think it's fair to presume that you can speak on behalf of all LGBT - I'm LGBT and I feel that it's the people who can't accept LGBT who should need to segregate themselves into a safe space. We exist, we're a part of Planet Earth, and they need to get over it and be decent to their fellow humans or go separate themselves until they can be.
  11. I'd love to have pets actually stay at (or as close as they can) the site they're told to be when using "Goto". IMO. "Goto" should be the same as saying "stay in this spot and do not move from it for any reason". This would solve a lot of issues with Masterminds who have pets that run out of ranged cooldowns and decide to go use their pitiful Brawl and then end up outside of the Mastermind's buff radius. It'd also prevent "chasing" by pets - if their target gets out of range, then the pet just picks a different target. It might not be possible, but it'd be very nice. :)
  12. Bolding by me. All players should feel comfortable playing on all servers. That's not an argument, that's a basic principle of human decency.
  13. I'd like to believe that in 2019, LGBT individuals are welcome on any server.
  14. What if... It wasn't a thing on main servers... But there was a separate server, where the ATs are locked into their normal primary sets, but have every secondary set available. That way, if it's imbalanced and terrible, at least it's segregated to its own server where that's all that exists.
  15. This is already my life as Bots/FF. :D ........ The idea is neat but I agree with the others, it'd be hopeless to try and make it reliably functional. Imagine a character with a Tanker primary and Scrapper secondary. Are the enemies just going to get bored to death or what?
  16. So what you're saying is, in your opinion, Psychic Blast is... a blast? Eh? -fingerguns- :D
  17. Sentinel primary sets don't have the same abilities, or stats on shared abilities (such as changed recharge time, etc), as Blaster sets. That's why I'm asking here on the Sentinel board, to see if anyone has some input on the Sentinel version.
  18. I haven't seen a lot of commentary about this primary here... anybody running it? Does it seem fun? I'm debating a Psy/SR/Psi build, though I'm on the fence. I'm also debating Fire/Fire/Fire (heheheheheh, fire), since... yay damage... but then I find myself thinking, if Fire's actual protection isn't that great, and the idea's just to do more damage, then why wouldn't I just be a Blaster? Or is fire actually reasonably defensive? I wish it had the damage DOT aura like the melee ones, though since Sentinel is sort of meant to be ranged, I understand why it's not there.
  19. Honestly, I feel like locking it would be a "win" for the people being rude, and would also mean my request's not likely to be considered, which isn't fair. :(
  20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy Telling a woman to be calm and passive in her response to somebody who's expressing sexist notions is also sexism. Food for thought.
  21. Just make a male character... You obviously rather hide all female qualities that make men and women vastly different from each other. I don't have a six-pack IRL but I make badass FIT looking super villains and play them regardless. You should be proud of a hot female FICTIONAL SUPER HUMAN in a sci-fi video game. It sort of sounds as if you're saying that women who don't have a huge chest can't be attractive, and are basically just men. Is that really what you mean to say? Because as a woman with a small chest, that's really a very hurtful thing to say, if that's really what you meant.
  22. Bullshit. That last bit, I mean - the "no accusation or implication" one. That's the bullshit, there. Because, if you didn't want to imply things about those of us who do like to make adolescent (or even younger) characters, then why even bring it up? It really just reads as you being a douchebag who assumes everyone else is on the gutter-stinking moral LOW ground. It's interesting that you're so defensive about it. ^ See, that right there is an example of "accusation and implication toward a particular person". What I wrote before wasn't. Are you better able to tell the difference now? As an aside, do yourself and the game a favor and be civil to other players - that means no name-calling, etc. Other CoH servers have shut down due to drama and it'd really be a shame if that ended up happening here.
  23. Like it or not, and this statement of fact is in no way an accusation or implication toward any particular person - there are some (not all) people out there who want to create childlike characters in video games for perverted purposes. Again, no accusation or implication toward any particular person. If making it clear that I'm not such a person reads as moral high ground then that's okay with me.
  24. wtf does this even mean Nothing intelligent. Don't pay it any mind.
×
×
  • Create New...