Excraft

You're trying to start arguments with people you disagree with as you have been repeatedly anytime these threads crop up. As for why? No idea really, maybe you're just trying to shut people up you don't agree with instead of learning to live and embrace diversity of thought.

Sorry, but I do think you're trying to start arguments with certain people. You didn't have any problem at all with the very first sentence in this thread - When someone you don't like said essentially the same thing, you start posting memes to start the argument going. All that some people essentially said was the trailer didn't appeal to them and based on that, they may not go and see it. There's absolutely nothing wrong with any of that. You are of course welcome to disagree. If I can be honest here, try following your own advice. I think it would do you a world of good.

All I see are adults who can admit that they were wrong and happily admitted so when they were pleasantly surprised. Where's the problem? Knowing this, why come here to start yet another argument? Maybe leave well enough alone and those same "usual suspects" will be pleasantly surprised again?

No one said they were. The problem you have is people commented on the trailer and provided their personal opinion, which you don't like or agree with. There's nothing more to it than that. And here we are full circle yet again. If you go to a restaurant, read the menu for the special of the day and see it's made from ingredients you already know you don't like, do you order the special? Is it ok for others to criticize you for not even trying it? You're judging the meal based on the ingredients you know you don't like just by reading the menu. You didn't try it, so you can't criticize it. You don't ever look at the ingredients list on a box of food at the market and decide not to buy it because it's loaded with stuff you can't even pronounce? Is it ok for others to criticize you for not buying it and giving it a try? You're judging the contents based on what's in the ingredient list without even trying it. You've never read the synopsis of a book on the inside cover and concluded you wouldn't like the story so you don't read the whole thing? Is it ok for others to criticize you for not reading the whole thing? You've judged a book by its cover. A movie trailer is like the menu or ingredient list or synopsis on the inside cover. Some people are going to love what they see, others aren't. Other's not liking the trailer has zero impact on your enjoyment of the movie. Because you can't leave well enough alone and allow others to discuss something or share their opinion. Do you even have an opinion to share on the trailer or not? That's what this thread is for. If you have something to share about the trailer, by all means please do. I think everyone here would welcome your thoughts on it.

I agree Handclap is shitty, but I don't think of it as an "attack" myself, more light a light/soft control. I've seen SS/INV tankers who use the stun effectively to mitigate the incoming damage during the Rage crash.

I agree with@ThaOGDreamWeaver. GoTG 3 was the weakest overall. I definitely don't think your opinion is wrong though.

There's nobody saying he's the director. The issue is you didn't heap glowing praise and adoration on the trailer, so of course that makes you some sort of criminal. Heaven forbid anyone doesn't like something. James Gunn was the director for Superman where Milly Alcock's Supergirl was briefly introduced. From the bits we've seen in the trailer, she's going to follow a similar characterization, at least for part of the movie. No doubt she'll be going on some kind of character journey. So yeah, James Gunn isn't the director for Supergirl, but he does have some influence on the character in the movie. It's not. See what @Triumphantwrote earlier in the thread. For people who like James Gunn's style, similarity isn't a bad thing.

You said that already. Nobody said he was the director. Gunn and Safran are producers on the film, so it's not like he isn't involved with the development at all.

Yikes! That's not a good sign at all. That's actually not a bad thought. Low-budget I think is the key part. The big problem Hollywood has is that they way overspend on these movies. Budgets of $350 to $400 million and higher means you need a billion dollar hit to break even. They ought to go back to the old days of doing more with less. It's easier to recoup your budget and make some money on a $5 million budget than a $500 million one. I don't see Netflix paying that much for WB. I agree WB isn't worth that kind of money. It's not even worth what Netflix offered in my opinion.

Nobody posted anything political.

I have to agree here. Adding the -RES just makes Rage an even worse power pick. Was the goal to make Rage so unpalatable that players will respec into Unleashed Might instead? I think Unleashed Might will work better for Scrappers and Brutes than it does for tankers. I tried it on my SS/Inv tanker and no crash is nice, but the damage feels sub-par. I just don't feel "super" anymore with less damage, and this is made worse with higher difficulty settings.

One more https://www.outkick.com/analysis/james-gunn-releases-supergirl-trailer-second-dc-studios-superhero-film-project-amid-mixed-reactions

Here are a couple more comparisons https://www.instagram.com/p/DSLrVZlEUtQ/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DSLRozJEnOk/ There is a distinct similarity. I'm not saying that's a bad thing.

James Gunn's movies all follow a similar pattern in tone and humor. I'm not expecting much of a departure from what we saw in Superman.