New Dawn's Paragon AT is pretty sweet!

[tidge]

6 minutes ago, Octogoat said:

So many people ultra serious about a game where we run around in our long John's beating the crap out of other people in their long johns and their Long Toms.

 

EDIT: Slight correction.

[Captain Fabulous]

7 minutes ago, Octogoat said:

So many people ultra serious about a game where we run around in our long John's beating the crap out of other people in their long johns

For reals.

[JasperStone]

46 minutes ago, Octogoat said:

So many people ultra serious about a game where we run around in our long John's beating the crap out of other people in their long johns

Wait...

We are supposed to wear pants?

[Apogee]

1 hour ago, Octogoat said:

So many people ultra serious about a game where we run around in our long John's beating the crap out of other people in their long johns

 

Don't be silly, I wear a speedo not long johns 

[ZacKing]

11 hours ago, nzer said:

Yes, to which I responded that something already being broken doesn't make it okay to break it further. IOs and incarnates already shift the game's difficulty balance away from where it arguably should be, which is a bad thing, and adding this new AT would make that problem even worse. And IOs and incarnates are tempered in ways this new AT wouldn't be (they require significant buy-in that any random character isn't likely to have, whereas anyone can just create a character of this new AT), and IOs at least have positives this new AT wouldn't (they enable deep buildcrafting and a player economy).

 

I'm not really understanding what your problem is with that logic.

 

For the second time, I never said this Paragon AT should get added here.  I simply disagree that it would destroy the game.  At least to me, it wouldn't do any more or any less damage than IOs and Incarnates have.  Sure, there will be those who would build unkillable nuking machines.  But there are already people doing that now and the game is still here and still functioning.  If that Paragon AT were added - and for a third time, I'm not saying it should be - I don't think it would be the world ending catastrophe some make it out to be.

[nzer]

8 minutes ago, ZacKing said:

For the second time, I never said this Paragon AT should get added here.

 

At no point have I said or implied that you did. But I'm talking about the hypothetical scenario of it being added, and you're talking about the hypothetical scenario of it being added, so why on earth are you so surprised that I'm responding in the context of whether or not the AT should added? 90% of the posts in this topic are talking about why the AT should or shouldn't be added.

 

It's okay for us to just... have the conversation we're very clearly having. The world isn't going to explode if you don't argue pointlessly with me about the exact nature of the conversation, I promise.