shortguy on indom

FINALLY... TO SHOW THE MATH... IF I MUST TO SATISY THE MATH SCHOLARS ON STEROIDS... NATURAL LOG METHOD... USE AT WILL. defense losing streak calculator - Copy.ods

...JUST WANTED TO SHOW IN THIS THREAD TO SHOW THAT EVEN WITH ONLY 5 CONSECUTIVE ATTACKS, THE CHANCE TO GET HIT IS MORE THAN THE CRAZY FORUMALS COME UP WITH ABOVE FOR 95% CHANCE TO HIT.....THIS EQUATES TO A +3/AV. (WHICH BY MATH = 95% ENEMY CHANCE TO HIT). STREAKBREAKER ADDS TO ENEMY CHANCE TO HIT IN THIS CASE. WAITING OVER.

SINCE I ALREADY HAVE IT HANDY... 😐 IT BASICALLY STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE BTW TO FOR THE GAME FOR 0.2 CHANCE TO HIT BECAUSE IT WOULD TAKE OVER 2,000,000 CONSECUTIVE ATTACKS ... 1 MILL SHOWN BELOW.

STREAKBREAKER IS A SEPARATE ISSUE AND MECHANIC THAT IS APPLIED AFTER A MISS, SINCE IT'S APPLIED AFTER AN ATTACK MISS, IT INDEED DOES CHANGE THE NUMBERS OF ONE'S END CHANCE OF GETTING HIT. ...AND I RESPPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH THAT CONCLUSION AND THE APPLICATION OF STATING THAT FORMULA WORKS FINE FOR ALL ATTACK TYPES. GOING TO SHOW THE WHY IN OTHER THREAD. ONE DOES NOT GET HIT MULTIPLE TIMES IF THE ENEMY HITS YOU WITH AN AOE... JUST ONCE.

AGREE WITH THE TRAP COMMENTS MYSELF BUT MAYBE FOR OTHER REASONS. HAS ITS PLACE AS A WAY AS AN ESTABLISHED WAY TO PLAY FOR SOME. ONCE THE PERCIEVED BENIFITS ARE UNWRAPPED... MAYBE MORE OR MAYBE LESS WILL BUILD WITH THIS STRATEGY IN MIND.

LONG STORY SHORT... CLEARING THIS UP FIRST. MY EXAMPLE IS SHOWING WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AN ENEMY TRIES TO HIT YOU WITH 'SINGLE TARGET' ATTACK AFTER ATTACK. MAELWYS IS SHOWING A DIFFERENT TYPE OF ENEMY ATTACK... LIKE AoE. 🚬 APPLES AND ORANGES. ...AND STILL NOT ACCURATE BECAUSE... 45% STORY... THIS WHOLE IDEA AS PRESENTED IN THE ABOVE TWO EXAMPLES IS LACKING THE EFFECT OF 'STREAKBREAKER.' (I DID NOT WANT TO GET INTO THIS AS DEEPLY IN THIS THREAD, AND MENTIONED MY PERSONAL FEELING ABOUT IT HERE. WAS NOT TO BE EVASIVE, IT JUST DID NOT SEEM LIKE THE PLACE TO DO IT... SO STARTED ANOTHER THREAD).

WILL GET TO THAT. THE SUSPENSE? ☺️

LEGENDARY 45% SOFTCAP: THIS IS WHERE IT ALL BEGINS... Defense Effectiveness - Paragon Wiki Archive the whys and why nots...

...AND THAT RIGHT THERE WAS DETAILED EXAMPLE... OF WHY THIS CONTINUES TO BE BELIEVED...

JUXTAPOSITION MORE LIKE.

45% IS ABSOLUTELY NADA.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BLAH AND BLAH BLAH THE DEVS TIME AND STUFF? HOPE YOU GET UR WISH.

I LIKE PIE.

SOMETIMES THE COMPLEXITIES ARE JUST WIVE'S TALES.

SECOND THIS MOTION. WOULD BE NICE TO ABLE TO EMPTY OUT YOUR POCKETS. ...ANOTHER UNRELATED THING WAS THAT NO 'PREMIUM MINI-PET' WAS OFFERED BY LUNA THIS YEAR, BUMMER.

...SO YOU ARE USING IT AS A SHORT-TIME 'SHUUSH'?

A TEMPORARY UNIGNORE FEATURE SEEMS WHERE THE CROWD IS TAKING THIS?

YEAH BUT +MAXHP.

WAS USING SANDBOXIE FOR 10+ YEARS WITH NO ANTI-VI OR ANYTHING ELSE NEEDED. IT WAS FREE... NOW ITS OPENSOURCE, AND STILL FREE, AND STILL USING IT ON MY WINDOWS LAPTOP, AND ALSO RUN LINUX ON OTHER LAPTOP. Sandboxie-Plus | Open Source sandbox-based isolation software

NO THEY WILL NOT. CHECK OUT THE ARCHETYPE SUB-FORUM FOR IDEAS. WAS GETTING DISAPPOINTED IN YOU SNARK, THEN REDEEMED YO'SELF THERE. TOO GENERAL OF A QUESTION.

GREAT IF YOU'RE A BULLY WHO PICKS ON MINIONS AND LTs.

THEN WAY BETTER THAN I THOUGHT FOR SURE. JUST THAT CHANCES FOR MULTI-STACKING REALLY ARE NOT GOOD FOR INTERFACES UNDER 50%. Interface Slot Abilities - Paragon Wiki Archive

AS FAR AS INTERFACE PROCS BEING 'COLLECTIVE' STACKING VIA OTHER TEAMMATES... CoD WRITES 'PER CASTER' THEN WHEN MORE DETAIL IS CLICKED ON SAYS 'COLLECTIVE.' NEED AN AI INTERPRETER FOR SOME OF THAT, SO NOT ENTIRELY SURE. I CANNOT TEST 'COLLECTIVE.' YMMV

INTERFACE ARE 'COLLECTIVE' 4 STACKS FROM TEAMMATES OR INDIVIDUAL 4 STACKING, SEEMS LIKE WOULD BE BEST FOR WHOLE TEAM TYPE OF THING TOP TIER: HALF CORE/HALF RADIAL, ALSO THEY ARE PER TARGET PROCS SO PROBABLY WORK BEST IF YOU HAVE MANY aOe OR pBaOE TYPE ATTACKS. ALTHOUGH WORK ON EVERY KIND OF ATTACK. NOT BAD FOR SOMETHING THATS ON ALL THE TIME IMHO.