shortguy on indom

instanced development: off the cuff an 'advanced hard mode hami' a 100 toon hami raid... when u die, you are "out" "multiple bloom number" choice hami spawns ....and development of anything else which anyone could think of other than for the main reasoning to be leeching on a single shard.

DRAFT.......DRAFT......DRAFT.....(categorizations only a draft for discussion's sake). issues: (some if not all happening on single shard only). (DRAFT). ⦁ overcrowding ⦁ excessive showing up early times ⦁ leechers/griefers ⦁ lost seeds ⦁ potential raid failures ⦁ no ability to 'kick' leechers/griefers ⦁ no ability to 'lead' non-leaguers fixed by "instanced raid": (DRAFT) ⦁ ability to 'kick' ⦁ ability to 'lead' since everyone is in league not fixed by "instance raid": (DRAFT) ⦁ overcrowding ⦁ excessive showing up early times ⦁ leechers/griefers ⦁ lost seeds ⦁ potential raid failures

my points in above are these post could have been done in "non-official" capacity.

Really?

Not sure just how the 'information kiosk' things count the number of 'ouro arcs completed'.... but it says 410 total if i remember correctly. (it may count duplicate/triplicate runs of same arc so unsure).

problem with same arc which i ran thru ouro. different problem though.

Collectivism - Prioritizes benefits for a group over an individual.

just last week finally finished every ouro arc available blue/gold/red. not sure what you mean by broken quests... storylines maybe?

Agree with this above. Tried to do this myself and got lambasted, though was doing nothing but helping. The first post felt accusatory toward folks who do not want to "league," so wanted to know more about the situation at hand. Not sure who said it...."Better to let 10 guilty men go free than a single innocent man be convicted." So, something which seems like an etiquette or unwritten rule is not liked by a lead, (usually takes about 8 lead total to run one of these imho)... and being late to your own party are an issue... than I am in the wrong thread, because not sure I can be convinced the GMs or the Council can help unless you get an instanced raid. Agreement is had that it can be a bummer... but what about something like a "Special Event" which can be triggered by the GMs or something if you could coordinate. Just seems like a lot of fuss to fix a small but irritating problem to require program development.

It's getting clearer, using the decoding ring... "Drink more...________." The unwritten rules are being broken (excluding the dual-box law on the books I had mentioned). So, after exhausting all possible options and elevating the issue(s) to middle management... to no avail... Only thing which can be done is one of three things: Let the next administration deal w/it. Throw as much influence at the problem as possible. Give these "leechers" whatever they want, including free green enhancements.

Have you asked them if they are?... Not going to touch the bannable portion of your response.

As you wish, please take 5 points off for spelling.

Has this reached the level of a full blown crisis? Random groups of "leachers" sneaking into a zone or via smuggler's sub... These "leachers" : do not want to be part of the league do not follow rules do not work for the rewards take more than thier fair share of the rewards (steal, as was mentioned). hide basically "ruin it for everyone else." My questions at this point are: Where is the council in all this? Has the council visited this zone?... or sent a GM representative to view for themselves? Has the league leader employed an SG security team at the "zone entrance." Have the "leachers" been caught in the act? Have the "leachers" been reported?... or just ignored? Do the "leachers" keep finding their way back to zone some other way?

Understood. I'm trying to see your points on this suggestion. Just that I do not agree with your categorization of a leecher. Suspect since they (the leachers) arrive early at the raid, that in reality the "leachers" are just "dual boxers." (They have one toon on your league and another toon parked). Suggest the "issue of leeching" that you are writing of is not an issue at all as you describe.... it's just "dual -boxing." If too many folks are wanting "hami".... turn "hami" up a few difficulty notches... Because a few students are not listening in class.... and above... re-writing game code for a hami raid is not needed imho.

What is a leacher?... just someone who refuses to join your league? Is it a "leacher" that is hiding buds around the zone.... for sure? Or is it merely powers with knockback causing this? Never heard of this 'hiding buds' thing before. (Usually had some volunteers scan the bowl after a round to make sure all clear).

Think there was a nerf lvl lowering change made to enemy groups in PI, but maybe was just in the Portal Parking Lot...? Liked it better before, used to be able to 'farm' lvl 50 tips missions in the parking lot. Does not work anymore if you are a lvl 50. bummer.

repluse/repel: had no idea of the level of confusion this has caused over the years... sentiment appears to dictate this needs attention. change it all. change it all.

re-naming an error is still an error. let's put an end to this re-naming creep. leave what has been wrong for 20 years alone.

How about a new story arc collaboration?

If I explain any more about this power pool Bop will nerf it. 3 must haves: Injection - stacking mez protection teammates or up to (-)57% ToHitDebuff enemies, -12.5% Rech., -18% Dam. . +procability. Field Medic - long recharge, but the +25% HealDebuff Resistence is worth it for me. Aid Self - +48% Stun Resistance... (and 5% End Ticks if you run Field Medic). Only take if taking Field Medic. Pass: Aid Other Resuscitate

Agree that the interrupts this set has can be aggravating while in the melee range, but to be expected imho if you care to venture in there. Field Medic's secondary power is an important one for me, would not agree to make any changes to it for that reason. The set varies in power with AT, kinda like 'leadership pool,' so unless you are a support toon you may not benefit as much from this pool power. I have always ran this pool power set (defender) and its uses are very evident especially when slotted up well. The secondary power effects are more important than the primaries to me.

Same thing.... Schedule "A" and "B" mix within a single enhancement. Maybe, but not sure if this can be done?

The ones above in "red" are a mix of Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" enhancements. Not sure the game can do this?

ty! giving this a whirl...

what to do about this bottom half of chat-box thing? happens every few months. lol.