Excraft
-
Posts
947 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Patch Notes
Posts posted by Excraft
-
-
Clip of the Human Torch's costume from D23. I hope this is a prank. Looks very cartoonish.
-
I'm surprised no one from the Base Snobs™ club has dropped by yet to drop laugh emotes or tell people they need to "broaden their horizons".
@honoroit - nice base. The inner tubes out in the shark infested sea is a nice touch. 😄
-
1
-
2
-
-
17 hours ago, Greycat said:
Is it? I mean, we've had plenty of complaints about things being non challenging - so they set up plus-star levels and such, and there have been requests for team content... so, labrynth. But we've also gotten power sets and perfectly soloable story arcs. Yeah, they may work more on one thing than another at one time or another, but... I've more a sense of it being balanced out as far as team/solo/small team long term. (And just like when Incarnates came out and the answer we got to "what about solo/small team" stuff was "Grind the itrials!" ... I'm not shy about speaking out about either side being ignored 😄 )
From my perspective, it does seem like more focus is put on team oriented content. Reading the forums here and chatting with others in game, I know I'm not the only one. There's a few of the HC folk who have posted over the years on the forums here how their preference is for team based content. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. They can work on whatever it is they want to work on. It's their server.
Adding harder content is fine when it's optional like the hard mode TFs. Quite a lot of people have been turned off by the NPC revamps though, which aren't optional. I could be wrong, but I believe that's where the distinction is being made. Not saying those people are right or wrong, just my observation.
-
2
-
1
-
-
I don't disagree with the spirit of what the OP was saying here as it does seem clear that the direction is moving toward more "team oriented/required" content. I personally don't think that should be the sole focus, but that's me and HC can do whatever they like.
Folks should also keep in mind there are other servers out there to try. There's not much any of us can do to affect change here. This server belongs to the HC people and they'll work on what they want, and there's nothing wrong with that. If everyone else leaves, they'll just go back to running a small server for family and friends. Remember, this isn't a commercial enterprise so there's no incentive for HC to cave to the whims and wishes of us regular folk.
I'm not at all disparaging the HC team. I may not always agree with what they do, but I do respect and appreciate their dedication and work. I both like and dislike the changes that have been made, and for now there's enough to keep me interested in playing here.
-
3
-
1
-
-
Saw a few clips of this... so Penguin was gender swapped and all the men in Gotham are wanting her? Ok.... I'll pass.
-
On 8/5/2024 at 4:18 PM, Duuk said:
Please allow Null to change origins. Sometimes I roll a character, start playing it, like the character, but decide that my original idea doesn't work in my brain. Then I need to delete and reroll because Tech should be Mutant and that seems... inefficient.
You re-rolling is still far more efficient, less time consuming and easier than anyone here trying to code this as an option to Null. Others who have pointed out that this is baked into the character are correct and the live Devs mentioned that quite a few times as I recall.
30 minutes ago, srmalloy said:And if it is done before your character reaches a level at which you've replaced all of their enhancements with IOs, you suddenly have a character slotted with enhancements they can't use.
Exactly what I was thinking.
-
30 minutes ago, ThaOGDreamWeaver said:
New Rockstars have a proper breakdown of everything that was shown in the real trailer, if you can stand the huge number of ad breaks, plus photos from a cunning Bothan spy who made it into Hall H.
That guy is annoying and one of the biggest shills on the planet.
-
26 minutes ago, ThaOGDreamWeaver said:
Errr.... hate to say this, but that's one of those blasted Screen Culture fake concept trailers.
When the shitty "fake" trailer is leaps and bounds better than anything Marvel/Disney puts out, that's not a good sign. I don't have high hopes for this movie either. From what I've seen/read of this, it sounds just awful. Now we all know why they're in desperation mode bringing back RDJ as
multiverse Iron Man"Doctor Doom."6 minutes ago, ZacKing said:Pedro Pascal is just horribly miscast.
Completely agree.
-
-
16 hours ago, BrandX said:
The action movie actors you mentioned. Let's see...Expendables, which was built around the idea of the old action stars. However, what young ones do you remember from those movies?
Harrison Ford? What? Indiana Jones? I've been saying recast Indy this whole time, guess what other people kept complaining about? Recasting Indy 😛 Just like how people complained about recasting T'Challa. To many people while at the idea of a different actor playing a role, when the whole idea is it's called acting. It can be recast.
I can't think of any action movie Clint Eastwood has been doing.
I need examples of actresses in their 40's playing someone in their 20s as I can't think of any movie that's done this. I've heard them complaining about being 28 playing the parent to a 20 year old (Rachel Weize at the time and why she didn't do Mummy 3, I believe it was).
Of course always the 20 somethings playing high schoolers, but you know...working with kids who can't work the hours.
Yes, I am for new younger stars. However, I go back to them failing and so big budget movies get nervous casting them because people aren't showing up for them.
I have to agree with you and @PeregrineFalcon here. Stars like Stallone and Schwarzenegger are from a different era when the last of the movie stars were in their heyday. In their prime, people were going to see the new Stallone or Schwarzenegger movie. Title didn't matter and their films were referred to as such. Today, people refer to the MCU, not the next RDJ or Chris Evans or Scarlett Johansson movie.
I also agree that there's plenty of opportunity out there for unknown or relatively unknown actors/acrtresses to be given an opportunity for career making roles. The formula of casting an unknown and surrounding them with a great supporting cast has worked very successfully over the years, especially in the superhero genre. See Christopher Reeves as Superman and Christian Bale as Batman.
Another thing Disney and Hollywood in general need to do is start looking at smaller budgets. Again, get a good script and start from there.
-
2
-
-
17 hours ago, Luminara said:
It's risky. If he doesn't take off the mask, people are going to ask why his casting was such a big deal. If he does, regardless of how it plays out in the film(s), there's a lot of potential for it to backfire in their faces. But simply casting him has all but guaranteed that at least one of the relevant films is going to break records. People are going to flock to theaters to see whether they brought him back as Alternative Universe Stark, or just Doctor Doom. They might start riots and form lynch mobs afterward, but you know they're going to see at least one film.
My theory is that they're not banking on Downey, they're banking on the Russo brothers. If they can pull off another Winter Soldier/Infinity War/Endgame, who plays Doom won't matter. That's what they're hoping for, Downey getting people through the door, the Russos gluing their asses to the seats.
I think its a very safe bet to say that he's going to have the mask off, at least for the early origin stuff they have to put in. I'm also not seeing this as a "guarantee" of anything yet. There's quite a lot of mixed reaction to this announcement, with many seeing it for what it is... a desperate attempt to revive a dying franchise.
Some fans are overjoyed, some are "meh", some are not happy at all. I also disagree wholeheartedly that it doesn't matter who plays Doom. They need an actor with presence that can give the character the gravitas it deserves. Absolutely RDJ could pull it off... if he weren't already Iron Man in my opinion. Bringing him back as discount multiversal evil Tony Star/Evil Iron Man / Doctor Doom cheapens the sacrifice Tony Stark made in Endgame. Another thing people are starting to talk about is who are the Avengers now? Is Thor still there? Shang Chi?
Discount Iron ManIronheart? Hulk?Even with the Russo brothers and RDJ attached, if the script is crap, the film will be crap. The number one reason the MCU has been suffering flop after flop is the poor scripts trying to strike gold. This is what you get when you hire "writers" who don't know the first thing about the source material and never picked up a single comic book in their life. Of course they won't be able to write for an audience they don't understand or care about. You can't polish a turd, even with a great director and actor(s).
I'll wait and see, but I don't have high hopes for this and it seems more like a stunt to resurrect the MCU. I do hope I'm wrong, but we'll see.
-
I can't get excited about this. The "multiverse" has played itself out for me and this smacks of nostalgia baiting by a desperate company looking backward instead of moving forward. So many other very talented actors out there who could do the role of Doom proper justice and not an alternate universe discount Iron Man. There's another thread going with some suggestions - Cillian Murphy, Karl Urban, Christian Bale... any of them would be better choices for this part. Not that I don't love RDJ as he's a great actor, but he's had his time in the MCU. Bringing him back as alternate universe
evil Iron ManDoctor Doom just feels cheap. -
He's pretty well spot on here.
-
1 hour ago, Luminara said:
Eh. I would've gone with Karl Urban. Dredd proved that he has the talent to deliver a compelling performance without showing his face.
Karl Urban would be an awesome choice for the part. The more suggestions I see others making, the more I'm convinced casting RDJ is just uninspired. It's an obvious gimmick and it's showing how desperate Marvel/Disney have become.
-
1
-
-
Marvel fans have responded to Robert Downey Jr.’s casting as Doctor Doom, and many wish that Cillian Murphy was given the role instead. Murphy starred alongside RDJ in Oppenheimer, and some fans have suggested that the Irish actor would have been a better fit for Avengers: Doomsday.
Can't say I disagree. Not that I don't like RDJ, I loved him as Iron Man. This just seems like a cheap use of the multiverse to backdoor him back into the MCU. I think it's a safe bet to make he's going to be an alternate universe Stark who went evil. RDJ is wasted on this role in my opinion. Of course he can pull it off, but having been Iron Man and so central to the whole MCU as Tony Stark, I just don't see this working.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Rudra said:
Nope, my responses are consistent.
Indeed. Consistently moving the goalposts. You keep doing you though.
4 minutes ago, Rudra said:I'm simply stating that if you want a music instrument that your character actually plays, then it has to be correctly sized to play by that character.
No one has suggested that they need to be musical instruments your character actually plays.
-
24 minutes ago, Rudra said:
Now show me someone playing one while standing like they do on stage or they would in the game. And even in the second one, it takes 3 people to play it.
Respectfully, you're constantly moving the goalposts here.
First, it was "oversized guitars aren't realistic" and "people couldn't hold them". Then when it's shown people can hold oversized guitars, it was "well, someone couldn't actually play an oversized guitar". Now when it's shown that someone can play an oversized guitar (including the neck), it's "they have to be standing to play it" as the new benchmark.
I don't see anywhere in the OP @ShardWarrior made that suggests these guitar items must be actual, playable musical instruments and would be used as some sort of all new sonic-based musical instrument set in the game that would require the NPC to play the guitar. You're trying to inject that in to justify your criticism. All that was suggested was adding some guitar objects as options for the various hand held weapon sets. There's no mention of having these be playable instruments by NPCs at some concert venue in the game. These guitar options would just add some flavor to a new NPC villain group, much like the Warriors utilize different weapons (axes, swords, maces etc.) as an example. Some in the new villain group could utilize Sonics, some could use Symphony Control, some could use Guitars in lieu of a broadsword or titan weapon.
-
14 minutes ago, Rudra said:
Yes, I do, but at that point you aren't wielding a guitar or drum sticks, you are wielding a guitar shaped or drum stick like club. I'm specifically talking about actual musical instruments such as would be used by actual people, and not just props.
Right so you'd like realism in a game based on a fictional world where super powered people fly around through the sky shooting laser beams from their eyes at aliens and zombies. 🙄
-
1
-
-
This is a cool idea! It would be very interesting to see what HC could do with introducing a new rock music themed NPC villain group.
2 hours ago, Rudra said:I do have to point out that a guitar is probably too small for Titan Weapons and drum sticks are definitely too small for Dual Blades.
You do realize 3D models can be scaled, right?
-
2
-
-
On 7/14/2024 at 2:07 AM, Techwright said:
It's Disney. Sounds like they re-assigned writers from "The Book of Boba Fett" to this movie. 😏
This sounds to me like another instance of Disney hiring "writers" who know nothing of the source material to write the script. It's not like they haven't done this before.
-
1
-
1
-
-
19 hours ago, Krimson said:
Isn't that why Harrison Ford is there? I mean sure, he'll be 83 when the movie is released but his voice probably works fine.
Harrison Ford isn't what he used to be and just having his name attached to a movie isn't instant box office gold. See Indiana Jones and The Dial of Destiny, Ender's Game etc.
18 hours ago, BrandX said:I agree! When they cast Harrison Ford I was not happy with it. I've felt he's phoned in a lot of his recent roles and this looks like another role he just wouldn't care about. Not to mention HE'S OLD!
I completely agree. His last few performances in Star Wars: TFA, Blade Runner 2049, Indiana Jones and such were all phoned in. He's not the bankable star he used to be 30 years ago.
-
On 7/13/2024 at 2:02 PM, High_Beam said:
Perhaps we do need another hero
I liked this movie!
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Lunar Ronin said:
I meant that I can only hope for a full sprint towards players being unable to solo at +4x8, the highest difficulty setting for teams.
Personally, I don't see a problem with people at 50+ able being to solo story content or radio/newspaper missions set at +4/8. I don't think there's many people running those settings in the 20s and below.
There's plenty of content specifically designed for teams (with more on the way), many of which come with even higher difficulty settings that are meant to be more challenging for and requiring groups/leagues.
I'd much prefer the game didn't become City of Warcraft where you'll need a full league to help you complete anything.
-
1
-
2
-
-
Teaser trailer
McDonald's already spoiled the ending with their Happy Meal toys lol
Can't get excited for this... not seeing anything that screams "billion +" at the box office.
Emote Macros
in Suggestions & Feedback
Posted
Yes
In a roundabout way, the OP is looking for suggestions on better ways to use macros for emotes and looking for discussion on suggestions on how emotes in general could work better.