TTRPGWhiz

Fixed that for you.

What’s the punchline in someone editing a post to reverse the OP’s statement? It’s just trolling. If someone took your post here, quoted it and edited it to look like an announcement of new power sets and posted that, would that also be OK?

Thanks for the clarification. Good to know where the Mods "stand" on this. Incredibly weird choice.

I didn’t say lawyers, I said creators. It’s been expressed by quite a few; Neil Gaiman and Damon Lindelof come to mind most readily.

That’s interesting. A lot of creators will tell you that they don’t read any of that stuff so that if something does make it into the show, no one can say “hey, that was my idea”.

You’re free to have your own opinion. Quoting someone and editing their post is, if not against the forum rules, a real dick move. Thanks for reminding me why you’re on my Ignore list.

Yelena in Hawkeye > the entirety of Natasha’s character arc/story

There are some likely clues to this within the initial Thunderbolts comic.

This guy gets it ETA: well...maybe not, given the confused emoji reaction lol

it’s a movie, not a show; and yes

"Bulletproof Bob" (aka, The Sentry) has one of the wilder origin stories, in- and out-of-universe, of any character at the Big Two. Well worth a bit of research, and I'm super curious if the MCU implements any of it. The Sentry's mini-series was written and illustrated by Paul Jenkins and Jae Lee, hot on the heels of their Inhumans series. They are both quite good (Jenkins won an Eisner for Inhumans).

Apologies in advance if this has been raised, but I would love to see many of the secondary Face items (the various masks, but especially Diamonds/Pointed/Rounded) added as Detail 1 parts. The current options suffer from the “painted skin” look.

Respectful.

Recommending those books (Warren Ellis's Planetary and the Whedon X-Men run) in 2024 is...a little fraught, given their writers, but they are really good books.

Cassaday drew some of my favorite books of a certain era (Planetary, Astonishing X-Men, Captain America) and won or was nominated for a bunch of Eisners for that work. More importantly, he always seemed to be incredibly well liked among his peers. He was just 52 years old. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/john-cassaday-dead-joss-whedon-astonishing-x-men-planetary-1235996404/

Some of the concepts they play with are pretty great; there’s a Superman-related conspiracy that’s particularly fun.

It's hilarious that anyone would be so prejudiced against a movie that they would downvote a post pointing out that one of the things they're upset about isn't real.

Honestly, unabashed salesmanship in the form of a 'LOOK AT THIS NEXT THING' stinger is exactly the kind of thing Stan Lee was about, so maybe it was the *best* choice.

I personally am very ready for Marvel fandom generally to move away from the notion that Stan Lee requires some sort of obeisance.

I miss the days when "In Before The Lock" was a thing.

This is where the discourse is at, huh?

What's to garner interest? Scummy TV creator does scummy things, is fired. This dude's career is over.

How many Topics can this forum handle that start with, "[IP X] Fans Say {some crap we read online]"

Would very much enjoy a Batman Incorporated animated.

This hurts.