TTRPGWhiz

Hey y'all, I went a lil crazy on Name Release Day. Snagged a bunch of keepers but also have a bunch I don't think I'll get to. PM me if you see something you like; I'll free up everything at some point (or just let them fall off) EDIT: will edit list with deletions as folks stake claims Big Boy Boxer Bruiser Catboy Cutter Deputy Mayor Doctor Death Doctor Power Dogcatcher Druidess Epiphany Everyman Foxhound Geo Gunman Honcho Impresario Lawdog Lightweight Limerick Magic Man Max Damage Mudman Music Man Pale Rider Scanner Screamer Shredder Sleeper Snow Devil Solarman Soviet Spear Stormchaser Sunder Urchin Warboy Warhound Wildboy

I picked up Ice Mastery, including Flash Freeze, on a newly leveled Seismic/Kin Corr. We'll see if it makes it through any respecs. This particular build has very little in the way of passive mitigation (Frozen Armor, +Def Uniques, CJ), as it was mostly built around teaming, but I end up soloing a lot. I've just got Flash Freeze with the base slot, and it's saved my bacon a bunch. This particular combo has no DoTs and a bunch of target-dependent but non-damaging buffs (and debuffs), which makes the Sleep pretty dang useful.

Bro, it is really freaking weird that you’ve somehow turned “Bucky isn’t a D list character” into “I know what this person’s worldview is”. Ima stop interacting with you now that we’ve reached the point of sarcastic non-apologies.

Yep. Still have that full run. The same team had a great Iron Fist book around that time, too. For the record / those who haven't read it: Clint Barton is very much not in the backseat of his own book.

Wow. It literally isn't.

I never called anyone absurd. I said certain statements were absurd. Funny thing about opinions is that other people get to have opinions about them. If y'all really wanna die on the hill of "characters fall into one of two categories", go for it. I'll call that absurd all day long. Because it's absurd. This is me feeling free to disagree. Y'all can do the same. Playing the card of "we're all just innocently posting opinions and being respectful of other people's" is some real (attempted) gaslighting lol.

"Isn't an A-List character" isn't the same thing as "isn't an A-List character, therefore is a D-Lister".

Bold of you to assume folks in the Comics Forum have read a comic in the past 25 years.

There's a world of difference between "I'd argue that..." and "here's a thing I believe is true and won't budge on".

"World view" equating to "here's my opinion about a fictional character" is wild. "I'm going to make a binary statement; either a character is A list or D list, no in between. You can' t argue with this because it's an opinion. If you try to argue that there's such a thing as nuance, then you're obstinate and don't believe in opinions".

Nobody said he's that level (although I'd argue that yes, Bucky is a bigger deal in the 616 than Black Widow). The binary of "you're either A-list / can carry your own movie or you're D list" is where I think people are taking issue. Because it's ridiculous. You seem to really want to infer a whole lot of things that I didn't type. Which is of course your prerogative. But consider maybe that that's the definition of a straw man argument.

Yes, he was was created to fill that sidekick role 80 years ago. Things have changed. The original comment that drove all this is "these are D List characters", which is an absurd thing to say about Bucky specifically.

lol, if that doesn't seem relevant to you, then there's nothing else to say

...80 years ago.

Is your argument here that because one movie featuring unknowns characters failed, but another wildly succeeded and spawned two sequels, that all movies featuring "D List" characters will fail? Because that is some interesting logic.

Guardians of the Galaxy, nuff said.

HUGE fan of the name release policy being implemented. I pushed for this for years on Live, so stoked to see it happen.

That's because it's bad info. They just announced some new castings, post-Gaiman allegations (literally within the last 3-4 weeks), which typically isn't something shows do when they're 'dead'. Accurate reporting here: https://www.vulture.com/article/neil-gaiman-allegations-adaptations.html (also Gaiman himself has said that the Sandman story didn't feel to him like it hits its stride until Death shows up, so there is quite a bit of good story left to mine from the other 67 issues)

Fixed that for you.

What’s the punchline in someone editing a post to reverse the OP’s statement? It’s just trolling. If someone took your post here, quoted it and edited it to look like an announcement of new power sets and posted that, would that also be OK?

Thanks for the clarification. Good to know where the Mods "stand" on this. Incredibly weird choice.

I didn’t say lawyers, I said creators. It’s been expressed by quite a few; Neil Gaiman and Damon Lindelof come to mind most readily.

That’s interesting. A lot of creators will tell you that they don’t read any of that stuff so that if something does make it into the show, no one can say “hey, that was my idea”.

You’re free to have your own opinion. Quoting someone and editing their post is, if not against the forum rules, a real dick move. Thanks for reminding me why you’re on my Ignore list.