Jump to content

nightroarer

Members
  • Posts

    141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nightroarer

  1. 14 hours ago, Sovera said:

    I understand what you guys are saying (though it's not as bad as it looks once you actually play it instead of reading about it), but compared to CoH it does add a layer of making things interesting.

     

    CoH is 1, 2 ,3 ,4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4. We could almost macro or autokey it and not pay any more attention to combat.

    CoH is only that way if you choose to play it that way. There is not a power in my trays that does not get used. Some get used less often than others, but they allow for greater tactical options and variance in combat. Between CoH and CO, I'll take the CoH combat system any time. There are powers from CO that I wish CoH had, and vice versa (when I played CO). CO has the edge in variety of costume patterns and being able to select multiple colors on the costume parts.

     

    Between the two games, I think CoH is by far the most fun. Having access to both games right now, I have no motivation to play CO. It just can't hold my interest the way CoH does when it comes to gameplay and immersion.

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, ZeeHero said:

    I think it's the same reason COH can't hold my interest for long periods. COH gameplay itself has not aged well- very poorly in fact, the combat is absolutely awful compared to even WoW.

     

    Sure, COH does basically everything else better, but the combat system is a huge part of retention if someone doesn't get deep into storyline RP.

    I like the CoH combat system. Getting CoH back for the sheer fun of the gameplay--including combat--has been fantastic. The mechanics are not perfect, but they are better than the other major superhero games out there.

     

    DCUO could not hold my interest at all, and I hated the combat mechanics there. I played CO after CoH shut down, but it never lived up to its predecessor. There are elements of CO I wish we could add to CoH, but overall, CoH wins out.

     

    The great irony in that regard is that early last year, my wife, daughter, and I were running together in CO and my daughter said wistfully: "I miss City of Heroes." Two weeks later, we found out about Homecoming. Our superhero niche came home. 🙂

  3. And then you have oddballs like me who kind of ignore the official AT origins. For example, I never choose Science as an origin because I hate fighting Vahz. However, I have a number of characters who are scientists; I just select a fitting Origin up front based on their abilities (Natural or Tech if their abilities are not superpowered, Mutant if they are).

     

    The imagination is a wonderful thing. It often supercedes came design for me. CoH gives me a fantastic playground; I decide what I play in it. 🙂

    • Like 3
  4. 1 hour ago, Twisted Toon said:

    I try not to use a spell checker. It makes a little red squiggly under most of my sentences. 😋

    I write fantasy and science fiction. My squigglies threaten to break the spell checker.

  5. I think having so much content is a great boon, at least for those of use who like to play multiple characters (I refuse to say "alts." I have no alts, just lots and lots of mains). It can probably be a little overwhelming for new players or those who have not played in a long time.

     

    My wife and I have a new team that we turned off XP at level 4--so that we could do all the missions for all five original contacts in Atlas. We turned XP back on when we reached the final mission in each arc. I also have a character with whom I used the base portal to go to Echo Galaxy and level to 8 via street sweeping. I set up my own RP-style storylines so that it did not just feel like street sweeping. I also got all the Galaxy badges.

     

    I have characters that go through the old tutorial and run only the older missions, others that go through the new tutorial and focus on the newer missions, and characters that mix and match content. Stir in radio missions, tip missions, and AE custom story missions (not farms for me), and each character can have a fairly unique leveling experience.

     

    To me this keeps the game fresh and adds to the replayability of CoH.

  6. You probably don't want to see my characters. I like old school costumes (spandex, capes, and colors for the win). 🙂

     

    Okay, I have more variety than that, but they are still among my favorite costumes.

    • Like 1
  7. 3 hours ago, mechahamham said:

    SFMA - Story-focused Mission Architect. This is a tag that non-farm mission authors added and still add to their arcs to differentiate them from farms.

     

    Simply searching for the SFMA tag breaks through the crust of farms into the liquid core of quality Mission Architect content. When you create a new, story-focused arc, add SFMA to it. Likewise, encourage farmers to add the 'FARM' tag to their arcs to make them more easily findable.

     

    Farming exists. It's a thing. It's a human adaptation to the environment, so in any environment humans wind up in, game or RL, there will be those who want to farm it. In this case, intelligently using the tools given to us allows us to avoid a 'Tragedy of the Commons' situation where the interface is so clogged with farms it becomes unusable for anyone else.

    This is true; I use it in my searchs, and if I get a chance to write missions again, I will use it in my descriptions (I really wish I had saved my mission folder from my old PC).

     

    However, I'm not sure everyone who uses the AE or writes AE missions knows about SFMA. It is a great stopgap, but putting in a filter native to the search tool would be better.

    • Like 1
  8. I think what could help the AE most is a straightforward way to separate farm missions from story-focused missions in searches. I'm not interested in farms (and have nothing against those who are), but sifting through pages of farms to find the story missions can be tedious.

     

    As much as I would love to be able to access AE missions in the city (similar to the way Star Trek Online handled the Foundry), it has never bothered me to go to the AE building. I have never treated AE missions as simulations; they are regular missions to me. 🙂

    • Like 5
  9. I experimented to see if taking a tip mission while in Echo Galaxy would set the mission there, but it set the mission in King's Row instead. Being able to run missions in Galaxy again would be fantastic. Well, as long as you have a SG base with the facilities and resources that Galaxy no longer has.

     

    As is, I did level a new character to 8 by street sweeping in Galaxy (set up my own RP missions to do so) just for fun. Yeah, I'm a dork.

    • Like 2
  10. 21 minutes ago, Oubliette_Red said:

    What they should have done when they added AE was make it rewardless, other than relevant AE badges and author-created souvenirs. Our RP group used it quite a lot to advance our character's own stories. Playing user-created content should have been it's own reward.

    But no going back now.

     

    Or rewards that were specific to AE. No rewards probably would have made the AE dead out of the gate, because many players are rewards-oriented. Why waste development resources on a robust system that relatively few use?

     

    For myself, I could have gone without rewards, although it would have precluded leveling via AE story missions. I'm okay with AE the way it is.

  11. On 7/15/2020 at 2:28 PM, Greycat said:

    My SGs used it for storytelling. Not everyone was 50, and it was used on the way up for relevant plot points.

    This. I had a few characters head to the AE right after the tutorial and level exclusively via AE *story-focused* missions (never farms). Talk about slo-o-o-w leveling! But it was a lot of fun.

     

    Running story missions in the AE, often in combination with regular content, added variety to the leveling and story paths for different characters. For those of us with a lot of characters, this was a great boon to keeping the game fresh and entertaining.

    • Like 1
  12. 2 hours ago, Apparition said:


    AE was the worst thing that Paragon Studios added to the game.  A lot of people warned them during the Issue 14 beta of exactly what would happen if it went live.  They didn’t listen.

    From my perspective--as a story player and not a farmer--AE was one of the greatest things Paragon Studios added to the game. I had a blast creating my own missions and playing good story missions from some pretty solid authors.

     

    Sorting past the farms was annoying, but I could handle it to find content I enjoyed.

     

    I really wish I had remembered to save my Missions folder from my old PC. I have the custom critters and custom groups, but not the missions themselves. Agh!

  13. On 6/30/2020 at 6:19 AM, Six Six said:

    not that simple. this was the weekly discussion a couple of few weeks ago. bottom line is, not everyone is cut out to be a villain. 😃

    This. It sometimes gets ignored in thread like these. For some players, no amount of "incentives" will draw them to redside simply because they prefer playing heroes.

     

    I'm one of those people. I have a few red/gold characters for a change of pace, but heroes are where it is at for me.

  14. 9 minutes ago, ZeeHero said:

    Thats ok until you try +4 stuff solo the damage is SO low you'll be on a single group for like half an hour.

    I don't +4 stuff, so it's not an issue for me. That shows the subjectivity involved in a lot of these discussions. Playstyle preferences can impact perceptions and outcomes in different ways.

     

    That doesn't mean I wouldn't like to see EM buffed to be more on par with other sets. I just don't see it as an unplayable mess. It's still fun, but can be more so.

  15. 48 minutes ago, ZeeHero said:

    Honestly there is only one powerset I would currently actively discourage new people from playing for their own good. Energy Melee. anything else is easily just fine. EM is just too far behind in about every way.

    I have a level 30 EM/Invuln tank (soloer) that I've had a blast on so far. Since I don't numbers crunch, I figure my ignorance of EM deficiency is bliss. 🙂

  16. 16 hours ago, Lazarillo said:

    Because it's not fun to just stand around.  There's nothing really strategic about Rage.  You play the game for a couple minutes, then alt-tab to do something else until the crash wears off.

    If it were on a support AT or something where there could actually be some benefit to changing from "offensive" to "defensive" play? Sure.  But on ATs where attacking is all they do, it just encourages going afk.

     

    It also doesn't help that the reason they pulled the buff was because people just were whining it wasn't OP enough, essentially.

    Never felt the need to go afk (especially for 10 seconds). I don't even pay attention to the crash. I just keep doing what I'm doing, and it seems to work out all right. 🙂

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  17. 1 hour ago, tidge said:

    While it is different to have to unlock contacts via the newspaper missions, the missions don't have to be grinds.

    It depends on the player. I do not enjoy the mayhem missions. When I finish a contact, I just want to move on to new contacts, not be forced to go through the whole newspaper/mayhem process. To me, this requirement is an impediment to playing redside, not a benefit. Note, it is the mayhem mission specifically that bugs me. The newspaper missions can be nice side missions.

     

    I do police radio missions blueside occasionally as a change of pace or to finish out a level. I'd like to treat newspaper missions the same way.

  18. 4 hours ago, Eva Destruction said:

    Some people here seem to be under the impression that taking things away from heroes will entice more players to go redside.  I think it's more likely to make them leave the game.

    Agreed. I do have some villain characters for a change of pace. But I much prefer playing heroes. It is not even a matter of quality of content, events, enticements, or what have you. I just like being a good guy. 🙂

     

    For players who like playing heroes simply because they like heroes better than baddies, I don't think there is much you can do to get them to switch over. Diminishing the gameplay for hero players to try to push them redside would be a monumental mistake.

     

    It is entirely possible that the lack of population on redside is not strongly related to the quality of content, but just that more players prefer to play heroes in general.

     

    Note: I'm not knocking the idea of making improvements redside; adding content to any and all sides is a win-win in my book.

  19. The devs are not wrong for making this change; it is logical given resources and the situation at hand. The word is cool, but not important for us to use. This is just a game, albeit a really fun one. 🙂

     

    Those who continue to use the word corona properly are also not wrong. The primary meaning of corona has not changed, although it may now have a new secondary meaning by connotation. It will still be used in scientific discussions and descriptive language as usual. Context of usage makes a difference.

     

    Side note to Shred Monkey: I apologize if I came across as rude in my previous post. That was not my intention. I respect your opinion and understand where you are coming from. We may not agree completely certain aspects, but that's okay. I want to keep things congenial, not combative.

    • Like 1
  20. 1 hour ago, Shred Monkey said:

    For this generation and time, "Corona" will be forever associated with the virus. 

    It's a little early to make that call. It won't mean that for me, ever. It is certainly not the first thing I think of when I hear the word.

     

    But I am not willing to project my own perception on what "this generation" will think.

  21. 2 hours ago, Shred Monkey said:

    Language evolves and words change meaning.   It was a pretty cool cosmic-sounding name.   But now it sounds like a comment on the current state of the world.  A re-name is warranted.   

    The meaning of the word corona itself has not changed. Corona and coronavirus are two different words with two different meanings, both of which have existed for many years. Corona is still a perfectly good word on its own, especially when it is used in its appropriate context.

     

    Coronavirus got its name because when viewed under a microscope, it appears to have a corona, similar to stars. Using the term in reference to the virus can be viewed as a negative; using the term in reference to a star or other objects that have coronas is still perfectly appropriate.

     

    However, the HC team faces the dilemma of having to police each use of the word individually to see whether it is being misused or not, and they probably do not have the resources to do so. In that case, a blanket nerfing of the word is logical, if unfortunate.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...