Aracknight

'Member when this thread was nice and civilized and offered suicide as a solution? Pepperidge Farm does.

I dont think this works as a power pool, but the idea of a super car (or other vehicle, nemesis horse, etc) sliding up to take you somewhere via the long range/team teleport powers (especially the ones that cross zones) is something i could get down on.

As someone who put the Celerity + Stealth in Swift on live on my Scrapper, i can say it did in fact make hostage missions very very difficult. But, could Hurdle perhaps be allowed to take Leaping (but not Leaping & Sprints) sets and Swift take Running (but not Running & Sprints) sets to avoid the Stealth enhancement in Unbounded Leap and Celerity? Might split the difference this way, given there's separate invention set categories for these things now.

Not sure if already asked, but is there any way we can extend the character name limit to more than 20? Maybe to 25ish? Or would that fracture reality as we know it?

No, I believe that I gave a reason why I feel a certain way. And now I'm being told that the way I feel is my own fault, due to a choice I've made? I think we aren't using the word wrong in the same context. I think you are using the "2 + 2 = 5 is wrong" context, whereas the context I was using was the "Eating babies is wrong wtf is wrong with you" version. I suspect you believe you are educating me and others in a helpful way, but please accept that very, very often the perception is quite the opposite.

Corrections to an idea. You know, I can accept "i don't like your idea" and "i dont think your idea will work" and even "have you looked at it thru this lens" but the phrase "correcting an idea" steps right on my goddamn nerves and puts the finger right on the pulse of the experiences some people have on this particular subforum. This statement, to me, implies not that someone thinks an idea is bad, but rather compels me to believe that one thinks that the idea is wrong and both it, and the person who had the idea, require correction. This is why people might take "corrections to an idea" negatively. I like the idea? Fine. I don't like the idea? Fine. Your idea is good? Fine. Your idea is bad? Ouch, but fine. Your idea needs work? Fine. But your idea is Wrong? Fuck that.

From a roleplay perspective, I like this idea. One could get a notice or a summons from a mender that something specific (a random story arc) has gone wrong that used to be right, and its up to you to set things back in order. It's a little more urgency than just passively clicking the crystal and trying to figure out what you're gonna do today. Sort of an Oro based version of a newspaper or radio mission. Obviously we wouldn't take away any existing mechanisms for Oro missions, just adding an option for some immersion or direction for those into it.

Can Scrappers and Stalkers get some of that sweet Storm Kick +defense please?

I would make the following, unaltered, seen in the game when levelling up at level 4 popup true: Specifically, the "At level 4, you may choose one of the first three powers in any Power Pool set" part. And I don't mean I would edit it to reflect the "Well, we really only mean travel pools" reality. I would make it so the first three powers in any power pool set could be chosen without prerequisites.

I experience toxic positivity at work, hence my slogan above. The definition I generally adhere to is: While the first part is arguable both in intent and in observation, I can absolutely vouch for the effects of the second part. Not necessarily in CoH per se, but generally.

I guess I'm looking at it through the view of the lens that asks "Would it make it more fun" combined with "We survived getting 3-4 Powers back when they made Fitness inherent, so what's the big deal?" I see and respect your point though, and thanks for giving specific examples.