-
Posts
145 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
181 ExcellentAbout nightroarer
- Birthday 04/09/1967
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Or maybe there are a lot of players like me who don't buy IOs from the auction house. We either create our own or use SOs. I don't have a Steadfast Protection +Def on any of my characters (100+), largely because I haven't investigated all of the IO set options to know what I'm missing. I'm just having fun and not worrying about "the best" builds. π I'm also largely a soloer or play with my wife and daughter. I don't do large group content. I'd be willing to bet there are a lot of solo/small group players out there who aren't concerned about making sure they have the best IO sets. I also don't ever camp names. I'm a writer and enjoy creating characters and seeing how their own stories progress. Some characters are played significantly more than others, but if a character concept doesn't really click with me, I delete the character. There's always more concepts to play with. π
-
Busiest Time of the Year - R3n4m3M4g3dd0N!!
nightroarer replied to Troo's topic in General Discussion
Or else all 50 will be disappointed that the name is still in use by an active player. π -
Busiest Time of the Year - R3n4m3M4g3dd0N!!
nightroarer replied to Troo's topic in General Discussion
Usually when I'm asked "Can I ask a stupid question?", I reply "Why not? I'm loaded with stupid answers." -
As a side note to Snarky's post, if you haven't watched the Monster Mash video he linked, you ought to. That's one of my favorite Geoff Castellucci covers. π
-
SG issues, recruiting, storage, retention, socializing, teaming
nightroarer replied to Snarky's topic in General Discussion
Yep. I understood that as well. π -
SG issues, recruiting, storage, retention, socializing, teaming
nightroarer replied to Snarky's topic in General Discussion
I would absolutely hate this--so would my wife and daughter, who have spent a lot of time creatively building and populating our SG bases. The prestige grind on the old servers might have worked for large groups, but it was horrible for small groups. I'd vote to never go back to that grind again. -
SG issues, recruiting, storage, retention, socializing, teaming
nightroarer replied to Snarky's topic in General Discussion
It's funny, but I've never joined a supergroup for any of the reasons you listed. For me, the prestige grind and cost of a base were annoying, not fun. The reason I join a SG is to enjoy running missions and spending time with friends and family in game. That is the ONLY reason I ever joined a SG, so there is "literally" a great reason for supergroups to exist. π My wife and daughter and I have several groups and bases (different themes). I'd say the current SG structure is amazing and a lot more fun than the old one. We can create the bases we want for the themes we enjoy. I also have a solo SG (for my solo characters) that is set up for their backstories. It's a lot of fun, and well worth it. -
My family says I'm fluent in Gibberish.
-
Can't say I won't use silly names. I already have Jester Notherguy and Artie Choke.
-
My character Milford Whimple's battle cry is "Behave, you hooligans!" His bio: Milford Whimple is a chemist at the Paragon Potty Paper Emporium. One night, as he was working on a new sensitive skin formula, members of the Skulls broke in and tossed him in a vat of chemicals. When Whimple emerged, he found he had been endowed with super strength and invulnerability--and a nice lilac scent. He has dedicated his life to safeguarding the people of Paragon City from evil-doers and developing the softest yet toughest potty paper to protect Paragon's posteriors.
-
I don't have any alts. Just 90+ mains. In CoH. Doesn't count all my mains in LOTRO and STO. Someone once asked me how much time I have to spend in games to play all of those characters. My response is that it doesn't take any more time to play 100 characters than it takes to play 1. It just gives me variety in how I spend that time. π That may be why I don't have any characters at the level cap in LOTRO (and I'm a Founder/Life-timer). By the time one of my characters gets there, some smart aleck has moved the cap.
-
I had several characters on Live that I was very slowly leveling up entirely via the AE, so XP was part of the AE on Live. I didn't do any farms, just story arcs. No insta-max levels for me. To me, the AE offered a change of pace and the opportunity to play a bunch of new content, which gave a much more varied leveling experience. While I only designed one active story arc of my own, I was working on a number of concepts, so the creative side was also a blast. The AE was never an holographic simulator for my characters. From my perspective, the missions my characters took were every bit as "real" as any of the official story arcs. Frankly, the only major issue I really had with the AE--on Live or Homecoming--was that I couldn't filter farms out of my searches.
-
Any *old old* game things you kinda miss?
nightroarer replied to Gulbasaur's topic in General Discussion
For me, auras yes, capes no. It always seemed silly to me to have to wait until such a late level to add a cape to your costume. Capes are a staple of superhero costumes and should be available at character creation. Unless you're Mr. Incredible, of course. Then "no capes!" I still run the cape missions on occasion (even on caped characters) just as a change of pace. π -
I'm not talking about door sitters. I'm talking about the rest of us. The problem with your "solution" is that it hurts everyone, not just door sitters.
-
It's not; I never said or even implied that it was. I don't door sit, I play missions.