GM_GooglyMoogly

I go to sleep for a few hours and we are arguing about arguing now? *Edit: Not you, Tachstar, those are pretty funny and a great demonstration of parody.*

Let's keep the arguing to the topic and not against each other personally, please.

Looking for excellence.

By almighty Cipher's time traveling abilities we are now at 85% and only four hours have elapsed.

This isn't the first time you have recommended I stop posting on the forums. Yeah. Please don't do that. Anyone is free to post their opinions as long as they stay within the CoC. Some people are just contrarians by nature. They like things as they are and need a bit of convincing to accept change. Other people crave change and adventure and want to experiment and try different things. Both are valid positions to have, even if having one position frustrates the folks on the other side. We love all kinds here. Generally though, I think people in this thread have been good about arguing the issue and not arguing personalities. B.E.T.E.O.

Six hours in, sixty percent+ to goal. Not bad. But we can do better!

You had started two threads with similar, some might say identical, topics. Both threads were getting responses from players. So it seemed sensible to merge them so that all the commentary on the topic was on one page. I did, however, mess up when I merged them into General instead of Suggestions and Feedback. I apologized then for that error and do so again -- Sorry.

From your link: "Ad hominem: This is an attack on the character of a person rather than his or her opinions or arguments." Objection overruled, counselor. Move on.

That's funny. I seem to recall that you correctly identified at least one of the posts as an ad hominem. There were, in fact, several. Who am I?

What the heck is going on? Oh. I see now. You know me so well. B.E.T.E.O.

It's probably best not to tempt Peregrine Falcon and others. But to turn this into a teaching moment, lets remember this snippet from the Code of Conduct: "There are three overarching ground rules that must be followed at all times: Anything an Administrator or Game Master says overrides anything else in this document - if they give you an instruction, please follow it. Don’t try to do anything you couldn’t get away with on the live servers. Enforcement of these rules is based on intent. If we deem that it is your intent to be breaking the rules and causing trouble, then that will be cause for action. If you unintentionally break these rules we will be far more lenient."

Please debate the merits, or lack thereof, of the proposal. Not of each other. B.E.T.E.O.

Oh dang! My bad. I meant to merge into S&F. Reset!

There were two similarly titled threads in two different sub-forums that I just merged. Apologies if that threw off the flow, but at least everyone is literally on the same page now.

Tell your friend to visit Glacier Peak on Indomitable. I hear they are looking for new blood on Hammy raids! 😇

How's endurance without Ageless? Or without any incarnates?

Actually, I believe he WAS genericed. Then he asked for a review saying, "I'm the author!" And then provided proof after a skeptical GM essentially responded, "Yeah, right." Of course, that might all be myth . . .

Please discuss the pros and cons (if any) of the suggestion and not the pros and cons (if any) of each other.

I'm watching you. . . . Be nice!

Please be nice to each other. Kingcedd03 has made a suggestion, folks have commented. Anything additional will just result in more personal attacks. Thread locked. Do not start the thread again or post all of those pretty pictures in someone else's thread.

I rushed over to see what was going on . . .