Jump to content

Gobbledigook

Members
  • Posts

    1316
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gobbledigook

  1. That is what I do also 😀
  2. In my experience of Tankers i would put Invulnerability or Shield defence as number 2-3. A SD Tanker was one of the better primaries for doing a MoITF buffed mobs no insps/deaths. I certainly wouldn't put Rad Armour so low down. I would put bio offensive below Rad. It is weak to none S/L damage and defences can be broken easily. I think there are weakness to all sets whether defence debuffs, end drains etc that need to be counted for also.
  3. Not sure why you are quoting me on that post but yea that could be a problem lol.
  4. I agree. I am not quite sure how that is relevant to me though if it was meant for me at all.
  5. Never? Is that your words??
  6. What argument is this you speaketh of?
  7. Thank you for that @Lines 😊 A nice response for a change is most welcome.
  8. What was your question again? 🤔
  9. I don't need to defend myself to you or do I? Are you a bully? Educate yourself with examples.
  10. To you at least 😏 Well it has been fun but I see how things are and will just leave it at that. 😉
  11. I thought I was one of those also. The official beta testers?or the elite beta testers?
  12. Change My to Our it is more accurate. And feedback on half of a discussion. Whippitydoo.
  13. Are you guys the Illuminati? 🤪
  14. From very early. If you had used the official channels more you would know this.
  15. How do I know that? Events say otherwise.
  16. It would have been nice if the discord link were posted in the official beta update page 1. Even sending a link or posting the link to those leaving feedback.
  17. No there should not be 2 threads on the same matter. One main official thread and one behind the scenes thread pulling the strings. My feedback did not count as I feel the official thread was overlooked in favor of the other one. Not even a developer could convince me otherwise. If governments were run that way......oh wait a sec.
  18. Hardly common knowledge either, it's not exactly overflowing with members. It didn't need to exist as there was a thread already for it. I feel your group were listened to more than the feedback thread that existed due to lack of any response and alternative builds to test. Yes fair enough but it isn't how it looks lol. Comes across as very elitist. Just saying. What i do find funny is the response this has caused and the "club" members coming out of the woodwork to defend it 😛 Transparency weren't actually my words by the way. I am not really worried guys, it is what it is. It isn't good. But if you are happy with it i guess that is what matters. I will be consoled with EM 🙂
  19. A secret club? lol. First time i have seen this. I don't and won't use discord anymore so it is no good to me. How many other secret liasons exist with the developers? So the feedback thread was a waste of time as others were giving feedback elsewhere that took priority it seems. That is why the thread had so little response. ToF with it's low damage and small radius that is buffed by Soul Drain that is not available until level 28 for some, which is to be mostly discarded at 35 and is not really an improvement on the Shadow maul we had on live. And that is why it is pointless giving feedback. Obviously not so Transparent then. Lol Gold Standard testers....so what are the rest of us? just peasants probably lol. Nearly 35k CoH with over 7k online members and just 103 members of this little GSt club with 45 online at this time. Definitely not transparent.
  20. I was thinking about this also earlier for some reason lol. A PBAoE circle which grants fly would be better. At least players can choose whether they want to be in it or not. I would suggest at least 2 minutes. It would also be cool if it put Rocket packs or floating discs etc under players feet and on their backs.
  21. But it was proven to be wrong. Of course they can do what they want, whether right or wrong. Ill just choose to leave DM as it pales in comparison to EM. And i am grateful to the developers for all their work. I just wished they had responded more with DM. MA was pulled due to feedback.
  22. Yes I suppose. But that is cherry picking. One post will have 5 votes and another had one, they choose to go with the one with one vote. Multiple people have left feedback and asked for something different. We didn't even get a chance to try something a little different. No response given. That is Ignored. I for one won't bother with feedback after this, it is pointless. It is ok though as EM is awesome and i will be playing that and not DM 🙂
  23. So Dark Melee was released entirely ignoring the feedback that that was given. Why did we even waste our time? Feedback is either being cherry picked or completely ignored. The rest of the update it awesome 😉 but Dark Melee should've been put back again as the feedback was pretty negative to it. Opening a suggestion thread for it would have been better.
  24. Katana then. Good single target and AoE with a defence buff. Rad melee, not short on AoE and the single target is pretty decent. Savage melee good AoE and single target. All as good AoE and better single target than staff. I don't even want to mention SS or the new EM lol. All the sets should be given a quick balance pass in my opinion.
  25. You are only tankier as a sentinel because you are blasting at range or using hover. You are not really any Tankier than a Scrapper, it is just that a Scrapper is in the thick of it doing very high damage. A sentinel is probably just hiding at the back or the Tank is covering you. Kill fast and less threat....less threat is more survival.
×
×
  • Create New...