Jump to content
Hotmail and Outlook are blocking most of our emails at the moment. Please use an alternative provider when registering if possible until the issue is resolved.

Forager

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    506

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Forager

  1. Forager
    ^ heartily seconded. It seems like a gross oversight that they're not already available, really. I would think regular minion attacks would have been the first thing to go in.
  2. Forager
    Is the spam in the thread with us right now?
  3. Forager
    I was thinking of them like hobbyist insurance adjusters, but yeah... it's definitely weird.
  4. Forager
    AE already does this.
  5. Forager
    That's an awfully complicated way to say you think the rewards should be balanced. Uh... yeah... the rewards for them should probably be balanced. Great input.
  6. Forager
    This is a fantastic idea. The Idea Police will probably be in here to tell you why it can't be done and blame "the code" but we already know it can be done. They can spawn giant versions of player characters already, so there can't be too much standing between the costume creator and GM size.
  7. Forager
    Nice. Thanks.
  8. Forager
    Well, you quoted a post that was addressing my question. You said "also" and "more" so I just assumed that your reply was relevant.
  9. Forager
    Oh. This must be specific to these powers on Titan Weapons, I'm assuming. Where did you find this information?
  10. Forager
    I thought the ring meant you had momentum?
  11. Forager
    He is talking about then powers that don't have rings. He asked for rings on all the Titan Weapon powers when Momentum is active. Some powers apparently get rings, some don't. He wants all the powers to have rings. He wants the powers that don't have rings to have rings.
  12. Forager
    The wording of your post implies that a lower defense to one type or position affects your likelihood of being hit by other types or positions. You didn't mean that, though... right?
  13. Forager
    I've only got 44.55% defense. How badly will this .45% impact my survivability?
  14. Forager
    Can we use the lines?
  15. Forager
    I think this is a high priority issue since at its core, it's about consent. I think it is extremely important that we have tools to enforce and withdraw our consent, especially givem how boldly vocal these people are about us NOT having those tools.
  16. Forager
    Umm...
  17. Forager
    I agree. I plan to do a second build, but I'm not ready to spend the influence yet when I'm not exactly sure what I want. I'm not very experienced or well versed in the endgame content. A third? I guess old school mode would be a cheap one to make.
  18. Forager
    Nice. The endgame for you is the whole game then. I do the same. I've been battling with using boosted 50s instead because for many, the endgame is incarnate and 4 star stuff... but I like to play the low level stuff to relax.
  19. Forager
    Whoopsie. I was asking @Water what he meant... but thanks for the definitions for attuned enhancements I guess.
  20. Forager
    What do you mean by this?
  21. Forager
    Are you sure that it's resetting when you log in and not just resetting when you open the title selection window?
  22. Forager
    Remote bomb is something I took for the lols because the character was "done." It is really fun, but highly situational. If there's an ambush or you get swamped or hit with -recharge. The only downside to it is that I forget I have it so I don't set it in advance ever. Trip mine sucks.
  23. Forager
    Does anyone else still run to Miss Liberty to train to 50? No travel powers? No tram? Sometimes your team would run with you.
  24. Forager
    The War Walls are for us.
  25. Forager
    Similar story for me, my friend... and I totally hear you on fixing stuff from years ago. Past me and present me have very different opinions on what "good enough" means.
×
×
  • Create New...