aethereal

Okay, but couldn't we just reduce those mags in PvP only? That seems like the easier fix than making it mandatory to slot a bunch of useless sprints.

No, seriously, can someone tell me why PvP KB mags are so high? I assume there is some reason, it seems like an obvious fix otherwise, but I'm now really curious about what the reason is.

Homecoming is, right now, inherently massively infringing NCSoft's IP. NCSoft has so far not murdered them with lawyers. Homecoming does not, by mere virtue of its existence, infringe Disney/Marvel or Warner Brothers/DC's IP (or a host of other superhero rightsholders), and also those entities have no demonstrated track record of tolerance to Homecoming's existence. I do not think that HC's policy against copyright-infringing characters is designed to prevent you from naming your character after obscure parts of City of Heroes lore. It is about keeping the number of people who can at any moment sue Homecoming out of existence down to just one, NCSoft.

I feel like if NCSoft wants to pursue a copyright claim against Homecoming, they don't need the pretense that you named your red-and-blue superstrength tanker "StatesDude."

I'm (genuinely) curious, why are PvP KB mags so high? Can't they be set independently from PvE KB mags? It seems like we could get the same benefit that the OP was describing, with less effect on the rest of the game, if there weren't a whole bunch of 30+ mag KBs in PvP. It's not a lot of powers, based on the list someone published mid-thread, couldn't we just tweak them all down to sane numbers?

Thanks!

There are a few "real" missions where all the emplaced mobs start off allied, and then after a trigger of some kind, they shift to enemy. I'd this possible to do in AE? If so, how?

The "just standing there" pose (shifting from arms crossed over the chest to hands down and slightly out from the sides) is the default pause of all characters. A few powers put you into different idle animations, including Tough and Weave, and they replay after you zone in. If you don't move after activating those powers/zoning in, you will end up with a different idle animation, but you can break that animation just by stepping forward. Beast Run and Ninja Run force you into a different idle animation as long as they are active, but deactivating the powers should bring you out of those animations and back to what I think you prefer, the standard idle animation. Finally, there are emotes that will leave you in a different idle animation after using the emotes. Again, stepping forward one step will break those idles and restore the default one.

There are times when it can be nice for RP, 0th Power: Like, my character might accept a jacket as a gift from another player, and it'd be reasonably neat if I could very rapidly create a costume with the jacket (and if they could create a costume without the jacket). It's very far from what I'd call "necessary."

Yeah, as QuiJon says, there's a fundamental threshold issue with regeneration per se (that is, with "buffing the healing that you get over time in a straight forward manner." Not the set Regeneration, the combat attribute regeneration). Like, let's say that your baseline expectation is that a "normal" encounter will lead to 100 DPS, and that a "normal" scrapper armor should mitigate 75% of that. For resistance, you set resistance to those damage types to 75%, and bam, this person takes 25 DPS For defense, you set defense to those damage types to, whatever it is, 30%, and 75 out of 100 of those attacks miss, and this person takes 25 DPS, albeit in a less smooth way than resistance. For regeneration, you set healing to 75 health per second, and bam, this person takes 25 DPS Now let's say that the player scales their challenge level up or down a little. Instead of taking 100 DPS, they take 90 DPS Resistance takes 22.5 DPS (that is, 90% of the damage they took in the 100 DPS scenario) Defense takes 22.5 DPS (that is, 90% of the damage they took in the 100 DPS scenario, though again it's a little more complicated than the resistance case) Regeneration takes 15 DPS. Hmmm. What if the player takes 110 DPS instead of 100 DPS? Resistance takes 27.5 DPS Defense takes 27.5 DPS with the usual asterisks Regeneration takes 35 DPS Or, just to drive the point home, it's pretty easy to scale your threat up by 2x in CoH, so call it 200 DPS: In that scenario, the resistance person takes 50 DPS, the defense person probably takes somewhat more than 50 DPS, maybe 60 or 70 DPS, and the regen person takes 125 DPS. Willpower finesses this by providing some resistance, some -to-hit, and also by scaling the regen rate based on the number of enemies near you. Regeneration will have to do something like that, something more complicated than "bonus to regen, click to heal," if it wants to avoid strong thresholding issues.

I softcapped my arch/nin sent in all positionals without mindlink or incarnates.

My interpretation of what Captain Powerhouse means is "I'm not going to tweak the mechanic to have, for example, more uptime," and also "I don't like feast-or-famine as a theme." Not necessarily, "the new inherent will share nothing in common with the old inherent." The impression that I get is that plans for the Sentinel rework are at a very early stage. I don't know how much CP is interested in feedback from people in this thread, but I read CP as saying in this thread Fairly hard statements: 1. No taunting 2. No increase in AoE caps 3. Inherent will be completely reworked: a. Will not need to click green or red circles to sustain DPS b. Will not have a feast-or-famine theme Fairly soft statements: 1. Would like the sentinel to be a spotter/lookout 2. Might give -def or +to-hit or +perception to allies But who knows.

-recharge is much more useful than -to-hit if you already have softcapped defense. Which definitely shouldn't be the only scenario we should care about, but should be a scenario we care about.

I've been thinking more about it, and I think that the right role for sentinels is extended single-target damage. Fighting "hard" targets, where, depending on your optimization level, a hard target might be a boss, an EB, an AV, or a GM. My concept here is: You need something that takes advantage of an armor set. You've gotta take damage. Tanks and Brutes seem like they have traditional tanking pretty well-covered. Scrappers are better initiators because Sents may naturally initiate from back with the squishies, and the squishies suffer AoE splash. Scrappers and Brutes are probably also both pretty good at AoE. Only stalkers, of the current armored ATs, are heavily oriented towards single-target damage, and their damage is front-loaded. So a sentinel can have a natural role as sort of the flip side of a stalker: you don't have that ability to instantly melt a medium-hard target in just a few attacks, but you have more ability to take a long fight to its successful conclusion than an equally-optimized stalker. A straightforward way to do this that wouldn't confuse any new players would be for sents to apply a debuff to a target: again, I think that -X% resist-all, where X is the animation time of the sent attack power (in seconds), is the right one. Stacking, with a duration that allows you to get to a sustained -20% or better. Then also give sent attacks that hit a target that has such a debuff a chance to proc a mild heal and/or endurance gain to the sent (similar to how defensive opportunity currently works). If you wanted to get fancy, you could try to make it so that the heal/end heal got more likely or better the more debuffed the target was, but I think it'd also be fine to just have it be simple. The -res gives the sent a team role that's different than just "inferior scrapper or blaster." It's not confusing, new players don't have to parse green and red circles etc. Min-maxers can work out the ways to have their attack rotations land their biggest hit at the moment when the res debuff is maximized. They continue to be a good solo AT. Is it really a role that's about being a "sentinel" in the common parlance? I mean, no. So what? Masterminds aren't all that mastermind-y, either. Corruptors are only pretty loosely "corrupting," especially if you take a buff set. EDIT: Is -stealth a possible debuff? We usually give the effect with +perception, but if it's possible to give -stealth, or -strength to stealth or something, then you could have the -res debuff also be a -stealth debuff and you could get a little bit of that sentinel flavor, especially in PvP where it might actually matter. That wraps up the "I'm removing stealth" thing with what Sents are actually good at -- fighting -- instead of being a team aura.

Yeah, resistance debuffs are fine as they are.

+to-hit or +acc or -def or +perception are all fine and fairly thematic, but they have the problem that they aren't very good. +Damage or -resist are something every team can use more of against every enemy type. +to-hit, +acc, -def, +perception are useful in niche situations or against one or two enemy types. Making sentinels focus around providing team buffs is pretty rough, guys: VEATs already do that, and probably do it better. Sents have no support abilities in their actual power-sets. Anyone who desperately wants the role of passive team buffs can get the Leadership pool, and there are a plethora of ATs who are clearly going to be much superior support. If the passive team buff is also a pretty, uh, bad passive team buff, that may confuse fewer people than the current opportunity system, but it's not going to make for an actual better inherent. Sents need an inherent that's interesting and good. They do not provide a lot of complexity inherent in their power-set, nobody's going to tune them to do more damage than scrappers, stalkers, or brutes, and all they do is DPS. The place for them to be a really first-tier AT is in their inherent, in a way that is not true of say Defenders. I just don't think a free Tactics is the way to go here.

I'm not sure that there's any realistic way to make an AT a "scout" within the framework of recognizably CoH. It's just fundamentally not the case that 99% of all enemy groups need to scouted. Stealth isn't prevalent. Perception isn't that useful except against specifically Arachnos at certain level ranges. People already max their chance to hit, and giving a damage bonus to specifically allied snipes sounds pretty damn niche. Having an inherent to-hit bonus yourself would probably make some differences in how very high-end builds slot things, but most players won't have the sophistication to bother with it, and it still won't feel like scouting. (I mean, it seems like about 80% of the player-base is ignorant of the res debuffs that Sentinels currently get and that their opportunities apply -- are they going to notice to hit buffs, which are probably less important?) An interesting role that probably is too "tanky" would be a non-tank initiator. Like maybe at the start of each combat (ie, when you are attacked or attack after 8 seconds of not being attacked), you get a substantial absorb shield that let you handle alpha (but no way to make it come back without going 8 seconds without being attacked). That might loosely fit into the idea of scouting or being the vanguard ahead of the group (or the rear-guard, dealing with ambushes), though in practice, again, I don't think any inherent will feel all that "scouty."

So, as someone whose first 50 on HC was an archery/ninjutsu sentinel, I think it's broadly fun to have the opportunities, it's neat to be able to trade off offense vs defense, and it's nice to have a single-tough-target killing niche. I agree that feast-or-famine is kinda a weird theme, that the AT is slightly under-tuned, and it's frustrating to have the whole first-two-attacks thing when you are so likely to want to otherwise skip one of those attacks. This is probably crazy, but: What if the two opportunities became two mutually-exclusive toggles available at L1, not slottable. Offensive mode and defensive mode. Offensive adds a damage proc to all attacks, defensive adds a heal and endurance heal to all attacks. They might cost endurance or might not, might have a cooldown like Hybrid abilities or might not, but the point is that they're available for extended times (not 15 seconds), on demand, with no attack reliance. They give you some more durability and longevity when you need it, or offensive punch when you need it. Then, replace the current -5% resists and -20% resist on opportunity hits with a -X% resist-all on all sentinel attacks, where X is the animation time, in seconds, stacking, with a loooong duration, like 30 seconds? Even 40 seconds? No damage scale change, no target caps change. So what's the upshot? Sentinels do what they do today, but a little better. They don't get much -resist on fast-dying foes (but that was never that big a deal), but in AV or GM fights, they eventually get you to -30%+ resist-all for the entire rest of the duration of the fight, making them really powerful hard-target killers -- eventually. It's synergistic with their set (you need to survive long enough to build up your damage bonus, hence the armor set) and the rest of their inherent (defensive toggle gets you where you need to go). They'd also continue their role as "an easily recommendable newbie AT." You tell people to keep their defensive toggle on as much as possible and then just go shoot shit. Done. This I think runs the risk of overtuning them, but they would remain outright bad farmers, I think, and less effective at clearing normal spawns that scrappers even with their offensive toggle.

It should've been possible to stack rage before ED. 240% or so recharge on both hasten and rage just from six-slotting them with recharge SOs. I didn't play back then, but did it happen?

Huh, it wasn't the client -- somehow windowed mode got turned on in the server settings, which apparently my computer Does Not Deal Well With. But I was able to turn it back off from the login-screen UI settings, which I had forgotten existed. Once I turned the in-game settings back to a fixed resolution instead of windowed mode, my game UI returned.

So two days ago I was playing CoH normally, logged off for the night, no crash. 64 bit client on MacOS Mojave. Then yesterday I start my client again and it starts up in windowed mode. That's weird, it's always been full-screen, but NBD. I log in as normal, select my character, get my normal loading screen, and... I get in, but have no interface. I see my character, I can see the "world," but no ui. It responds to keyboard commands as usual in terms of movement etc. I have tried ctrl-U, which I understand to be the shortcut to hide the UI. No change. Pressing M or C to bring up the map and chat windows does nothing. This happens on all my characters and on both servers I've played on (Indom & Everlasting). Okay, so, whatever, right? I delete the client, delete island rum. Redownload island rum, have it redownload the client. Same thing: I start in windowed mode, no game UI once I'm in the game. I uninstalled wine and reinstalled wine. Same thing. I'm baffled. This seems like it has to be a client-side issue, but I have no idea how it could have survived deletion of the application, island rum, and wine. Anyone have any ideas?

Hah, thanks! Your suggestion did in fact work, I'm back on the 64 bit client. Thanks for the help!

Welp, I deleted island rum and now the new copy won't load the manifest, so that's cool. I assume it's either transitory or else I'll just go ahead and restore my deleted copy, but an unwelcome surprise. (EDIT: And the key to that was to post a complaint on the forums, which magically unbroke it. 😉 ) Is there a way to reliably get the latest island rum? I can't seem to find a canonical location.

Until the update a few days ago, I had been using the 64 bit client out of Island Rum. After the client update from last week, the 64-bit option was grayed out and when I select it, it warns me that it "may not work this this client." If I tell it to go anyway, it doesn't do anything. I upgraded my version of MacOS from Sierra to Mojave, and did brew upgrade wine, neither changed anything. I can use the safe mode client, but not the non-safe mode 32 bit, either. Anyone know what's up?