SwitchFade

Again.. Hard no vote.

So, the 1337 Entitlement accolade? I guess actually playing that content isn't a good use of time unless someone gives out a cookie

Sorry, hard no vote. They're difficult for a reason and that's a good thing. There are easier factions and harder factions... Countess Crey and her cronies are no joke, by design.

Desdamona costume. Do it.

Stack ranged and kite

Entitlement accolade?

5% tohit?! Absolutely not

Yes, the 7 seconds is absolutely a game breaker. No vote.

Short term fluctuation. They routinely sell for 1-2 mill, the proc for 2-3. Attuned and non bucket, AH doesn't see them as separate when auctioned.

I repeat, No vote.

Beavis & Butthead solved this one for us... FIRE.

I'm surprised no one has offered what is considered best online game wisdom... Git Gud. Now that you know, venture forth and be Uber1337gosu.

You have convinced me. Replace Ms. Liberty with @Jimmy

Sorry, no vote.

Completely irrelevant to the topic. Please don't derail the thread.

Personal attacks only serve to undeacore that your proposition has little merit. Your declaration that you do not want to persuade me to agree with you demonstrates you aren't serious about the proposed suggestion. As such, your audience adjourns convinced your position is undesirable.

That's a lot of assumptions. How do you know I don't like kick? As I just said, I find it fun. What makes those other choices more fun for ME? The statement "would you not" is a tactic to set up the opposing view to be defensive and defend why they would not, which is an argumentative fallacy, sorry but you still need to persuade me why any of those choices you see as more fun, would -in fact- be more fun to ME. As I said, I think the fighting pool is fun, and hard no vote to changes proposed herein, as they are less fun. So, do you have supporting evidence, reasoning and direct benefits to my fun factor you can provide me with to persuade me?

I don't find it boring, I find it fun. Is my perspective valid?

You know, trying to convince your audience to change their position from the current state to your new proposed state is Ill served with this type of tactic. The onus rests with the person trying to persuade for a change, not on the audience to defend the current majority state. How have you syllogistically overcome objections? How have you proposed improvements with evidence? How have you innoculated against objection? How have you considered channel interference of your message? If your entire argument is couched in unsupported opinion, personal preference and tactics that involve hyperbole, innuendo or straw man statements, you may not find a receptive audience. Regardless, you have changed my no vote to... HARD no vote. So, you were successful, just not quite in the way you hoped; however, this does teach us a great lesson about how to change minds.

You have convinced me. Delete AE.

You have convinced me. Buff Kick.

Etov oN

No vote, sorry.

Pictures, or it didn't happen?

They existed.