Jump to content

arcane

Members
  • Posts

    4878
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by arcane

  1. Well… Overcap and Proc Rate Reductions, to be clear, right?
  2. Does this address your concerns? Thanks for leading the charge on Tanker testing. All signs seemed to point to it being patch week but I knew the Tanker inherent changes were not going over well enough.
  3. The OP may or may not be right. I’d just be pissed if one of the seven powers I take on every single character now (Hasten/SS/CJ/SJ/TP/CT/FS) got nuked from orbit to such an extent that a respec felt necessary. Because that alone would burden me an order of magnitude more than even the current huge page in beta would. But I acknowledge that’s not an actual argument to the developers.
  4. I actually like that there’s one single class of things on the market where the price ranges haven’t been completely flattened by converters. If you want a drop pool to yield a more consistent and predictable reward, isn’t the entire rest of the game already doing that for you?
  5. The creation of Fold Space basically led to the complete abandonment of the Fighting Pool by all of the game’s high end players. So it has extreme opportunity costs as is and requires proper use to not be positively counterproductive. Color me skeptical but maybe I just don’t want to do 63 respecs over your weekend whim. EDIT: 63 is the current number of completed characters with Fold Space but it will shoot up again next week. EDIT 2: also the implication at the end of the OP that a guy with 63 Fold Spacers should just start playing nothing but a Warshade 24/7 and problem solved is big lol.
  6. Although I never run completely solo +4x8 anymore and am pretty sure I am unlikely to experience the full impact of this, this does not sound quite acceptable.
  7. Is it possible that one crowd is simply more cognizant of how the game has always been balanced historically and thus just has realistic expectations? Like I don’t think a side is being favored just because Seeds of Confusion is getting nerfed. The sides aren’t “nerf nothing” vs “nerf everything”. They’re more like “nerf nothing” vs “reality”.
  8. I don’t think anyone expects you to test to verify that a damage reduction exists. The damage reduction is the intended change and not the point. The point of testing is to determine if the changes are too impactful or not impactful enough on overall gameplay. It doesn’t sound like you’ve assessed the actual impact of the changes.
  9. Considering I don’t personally believe a Control set needs to be Fire Blast tier at AoE killing… if fixing the objectively overpowered Seeds and the broken Creeper proc rate is resulting in a clear time increase (not exactly the most important metric for a Control set but okay) but the set gains way more control and mitigation… I’m struggling to see a problem here.
  10. Homecoming not existing would be a pretty big L for many of us. I get that you haven’t liked CoH in years but try to read the room. Some of us actually care about it still. Call me confused about what you hope to accomplish by actively wishing for the game to fail.
  11. Assuming the OP hasn’t been keeping up with the changes. When accounting for the Creepers nerf, the Seeds buff/nerf (did get buffed in some ways), the Tree buff, the Spore buff, the Vines buff, and the Fly Trap buff, it’s obvious the set is getting a net buff.
  12. Lmao. The exploit is around because the developers are afraid of a few megapopular Kheldian mains setting the forums and discord on fire. Calling this exploit balanced is wild. But yeah! Off topic so carry on.
  13. well see i want to queued power to go off
  14. Does it just need the same accuracy as everything else? I normally build for 95% chance to hit +3 before accuracy enhancements when I can so that wouldn’t be a problem. Or are you saying it has special accuracy concerns like when certain pets and pseudopets don’t inherit your accuracy and tohit values and needs the additional slotting regardless of your stats.
  15. Firm believer in needing to take a power if you’re after its animation
  16. No thank you to changing the current system
  17. IMO your ask for -50% is extremely reasonable. They’re waiting until Build 7 to cave >.>
  18. Yep, this.
  19. I’ve prepped my respec builds for my Dark/Dark Controller and Dark/Storm Defender. In both I just slotted this with two Recharge IO’s. Sound good?
  20. Did something happen to the farmers? 🫠
  21. IMO they should just go with the BU/Rage modifier change and the radius/base damage nerf and drop the overcap stuff for now. If further nerfs are still needed they can add that back next page.
  22. Don’t want to make this harder for those fighting the good fight, but, to those saying they would take radius reductions for their base damage back, I am not personally convinced I want to make that trade.
  23. If you use this power on the wrong enemy group, and it does wind up doing a bunch of phasing, can you cancel the power in your buff bar and cancel the phase?
  24. Sorry for the misunderstanding. That’s better but I think my point stands. “The AV can only knock me on my ass for the first half of the fight” doesn’t really make me feel like I can forego Blessing of the Zephyr procs. And if I don’t feel confident doing that, the buff really is meaningless to me. Assuming there’s a zero sum approach to balance where this buff has some value in the equation that keeps the set from getting a different kind of buff, I would most likely prefer a different kind of buff. Or just a reliable version of KB protection even if the overall mag is lower.
×
×
  • Create New...