-
Posts
5173 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
111
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Patch Notes
Everything posted by Luminara
-
Sins of the Devs are visited upon the players
Luminara replied to The_Warpact's topic in General Discussion
-
Sins of the Devs are visited upon the players
Luminara replied to The_Warpact's topic in General Discussion
A series of alphanumeric characters arranged in groups which are placed sequentially in order to convey articulated thought? Unless it was Welsh, in which case it was a series of alphanumeric characters arranged in groups which were placed sequentially to drive readers insane. BUY A VOWEL, WALES! -
Just make another shortcut. Or check the trash, see if you accidentally threw it away. Go to the Tequila folder. Drag tequila.exe to the desktop while holding Alt. Drop it. You can rename it later. Easy peasy dirty sleazy.
-
Sins of the Devs are visited upon the players
Luminara replied to The_Warpact's topic in General Discussion
They exist so critters have the tiniest chance to kick your ass. Auto powers and clicks couldn't be suppressed, shut off or otherwise set to remove their effects when the game was created. A toggle, being a short duration click which the game automatically clicks for you at pre-determined intervals, can have its effects removed. You can be sapped and have your toggles shut off. You can be mezzed and have your toggles shut off. You can run out of endurance through your own actions and have your toggles shut off. In a game with enemies so stupid that they can't walk up a ramp, some concessions have to be made to give them any semblance of equivalency to player characters. Toggles are one of those concessions. -
Could it have been automatically archived due to lack of use? Is it possible you switched desktops or logged into your computer with a different account (also would show a different desktop)? And, why not just make a new shortcut to the launcher and fuggedaboudit, since I'm asking questions?
-
Feedback on the Finale - Ride of the Valkyrie
Luminara replied to Zappalina's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
VALKYRIE MOUNTS CONFIRMED! -
Petition to limit incarnate use for new content (ITF, etc.)
Luminara replied to Sarn's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
Now make him do the wave. -
Defense build goals for squishies in Page 4
Luminara replied to Bastille Boy's topic in General Discussion
I've always prioritized Fire/Cold and Energy/Negative over anything else, because those are what the killer debuffs, -Recharge and -ToHit, are attached to. Damage is survivable, debilitation is what leads to defeat. Page 4 didn't require, or warrant, a single respec for any of my characters. -
Sins of the Devs are visited upon the players
Luminara replied to The_Warpact's topic in General Discussion
My petless mastermind hasn't even noticed the aggro and attack type adjustments. If you're finding the game harder despite having better and stronger characters, it's you, not the changes. -
Sins of the Devs are visited upon the players
Luminara replied to The_Warpact's topic in General Discussion
Change is painful at times. Not knowing what's coming, not knowing how or if we can adapt, it's unpleasant. Routine is comfortable, and comforting. Uncertainty is terrifying. But change is also growth, and routine, that's just another word for stagnation. Change is necessary. It makes us sharper, forces us to develop new skills and refine existing ones, and drives us to be more than we were. It helps us become better, not just as players, but as people. And that makes it worthwhile, worth enduring, worth adapting. -
We've secretly replaced @Troo's launcher with Folger's Crystals. Let's see if he notices...
- 12 replies
-
- 11
-
I'm constantly tweaking my level 50 characters. The more I play them, the more I find things I can remove, replace, revise, and there's usually a lot of room for change because I tend to get stuck in a rut when I'm building, using the same IOs on everything, chasing the same set bonuses, making the same decisions even when they don't make sense or serve no purpose. Why do I have the 5% +Res (All) unique on a character who never gets hit because everything is always mezzed? Get rid of it! Do I need a fifth attack for a character with a perfect attack chain using four powers? No! Can I wean myself off of all of this extra Slow Resistance I've accumulated and replace it with a little more Fire/Cold Defense? Yes, I can! It keeps the game fresh, even with characters that would otherwise be "done". And that's a critical retention feature for me. If this were another MMORPG, I'd be at max level and have no real path forward, nothing to do but level another character or wait for an expansion. There are only so many ways you can adjust a "skill tree" build, whereas the flexibility of Co* offers almost endless possibilities, even within a single build. And half the fun is testing theoretical improvements and seeing how they actually perform in the game.
-
I didn't even know there was a hidden AE, or that it had been nerfed. They really hid it well!
-
No More Empyrean Merits to Reward Merits
Luminara replied to DarionLeonidas's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
25,000,000 inf* to create rare Incarnate salvage out of threads, plus enough threads to make all of the common and uncommon salvage to combine to the rare. 200,000,000 inf* (4x rare + 100,000,000 inf*) to create very vare Incarnate salvage, plus all of the threads to create the common and uncommon salvage used to make the rares. Each T3 requires one rare salvage, each T4 requires two T3s, so 250,000,000 inf* total to create a single T4 Incarnate ability. Six Incarnate abilities, 1,500,000,000 inf*. Empyreans aren't going anywhere. I'll give the ultimate power wedgie to anyone who tries to take them out. -
Petition to limit incarnate use for new content (ITF, etc.)
Luminara replied to Sarn's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
7.5 seconds (Barrier Radial Epiphany) or 10 seconds (Barrier Core Epiphany), from cast. Drops to 30% for the next 15 seconds (Barrier Radial Epiphany) or 35% for 20 seconds (Barrier Core Epiphany). Then it's 5% for the next 22.5 seconds (Barrier Radial Epiphany) or 7.5% for 30 seconds (Barrier Core Epiphany). The final drop brings it to 2.5% for the last 45 seconds (Barrier Radial Epiphany) or 5% for 60 seconds (Barrier Core Epiphany). -
Sins of the Devs are visited upon the players
Luminara replied to The_Warpact's topic in General Discussion
I'm not old, I'm fermented. -
Any surprises you've come across with Alpha slotting?
Luminara replied to biostem's topic in General Discussion
I am an unrepentant Agility Radial Paragon junkie. I'll fight anyone who tries to come between me and my zoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom. I'll shiv a mofo. SHIV A MOFO. So I was really struggling with my Dark/Martial dominator. I had the build "perfect", but it just wasn't perfect. The more I played it, the less I enjoyed it. I just wanted to defeat +0 critters without having to use one more attack to finish off that 0.001 HP they always had left, and nothing I was doing seemed to make that happen. I respeced into Cross Punch. I respeced out of Cross Punch. I respeced into Spring Attack, and out of Spring Attack. Nothing was cutting the mustard and I was close to abandoning the character and trying a /Martial blaster or MA/* scrapper (really didn't want to do that, because none of the other variations have as much AoE). Until I tried Musculature. Night and freaking day difference. All of those kicks and shuriken throws finally felt right. An absolute joy to play. I love it. It's my second favorite character now. AND I STILL HAVE ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM! Thank you, Musculature gods! -
Sins of the Devs are visited upon the players
Luminara replied to The_Warpact's topic in General Discussion
You can please some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time. They're doing their best. There were things which didn't thrill me in this update. There were things I didn't notice or care about in past updates. This extends to the 7 years I spent playing on the original servers. But I've learned to expect that with every update, in every game. Do I agree with every decision they make? Shit, no. But I also don't disagree with every decision they make, because even the ones I don't like are intended to make the game better in some way. That's all they're really trying to do, make the game better. Where the problem you see arises is how your definition of "better" may differ from theirs. Co* isn't perfect. It launched with serious design flaws and oversights, some of which still haunt us today. It's never been well balanced and probably never will be. And right now, the HC team appears to be going wild, buffing this and buffing that and everything seems like it's spiraling out of control. But they have a game plan (pun intended). They have a goal. They have a direction. They understand that they can't balance anything if there are massive disparities between things which are supposed to be similar. So before they can start grab a level and start working on balance, they have to either bring the over-performers down (which would incite mass riots), or bring the under-performers up. We have a lot more over-performers than under-performers at the moment, but that's because they've been whittling away at the under-performers for three years. Would you, honestly, have even considered taking a pre-I27 Trick Arrows anything along on a Hard Mode run? Or even a basic Incarnate trial? Honestly? I wouldn't, and I've got more experience with TA under my belt than anyone else here. That's what they're addressing now. They're maybe halfway finished. Maybe. Still a lot of work to do before it all starts to come together, but it will come together. We will get there. In the meantime, make your own challenges. Stop playing hyper-powerful builds. Play Kinetic Melee. Play a petless mastermind or dominator. Play something that isn't easy mode, there's a lot of it still in the game. You're the author of your experience with this game. Or leave. Go, play on a server without HC's changes. Whatever makes you happy. Me, I'll be right here, enjoying the ever-loving fuck out of the game for as long as I can, because I had to live through two Snaps. The first when I quit in 2011 and longed for it every day until I decided to come back, and the second in 2013, when I tried to come back and discovered that it was gone. I don't care what the HC team does at this point, I'm not going through that again. I'll be here until they drag me away, kicking, screaming, biting and flailing wildly. The HC team isn't going to meet my expectations every time they do something, and that's fine, because I'm looking three years down the road, not at tomorrow, not at yesterday, and I see it all falling into place. I'm willing to wait, to put up with annoyances, to have faith. That said, I'm also not the kind of player who soloes GMs and AVs, or who builds anything to do so. That shit takes too fucking long. I know because I did it a long, long time ago, when I thought I had something to prove. I did it with SOs. I did it with a 0.55 melee damage modifier and no Damage enhancements in my attacks. II did it without status protection. I'm quite content, now, to take the lazy approach of making builds to play +1/x5 at 50+ and just run around kicking the crap out of minions, lieutenants and regular bosses. I'm happy that the game has finally reached the point of allowing me to do that without feeling like I'm pushing a boulder up a hill. Fuck the days of scrounging and scraping to afford a single purple IO. To hell with feeling lucky to have one reasonably kitted out character. Not being able to make a Greco-Roman character at level 1, or having to grind for weeks to unlock content, or being forced to team in order to make any Incarnate progress can bite my perfect little ass. I'll take a game that allows me to build what I want and not struggle over a "challenge" any day of the week. I can make my own challenges and keep the game fresh for myself, I don't need imposed poverty and arbitrary, senseless restrictions to do it for me. But that's me. You want something else, and that's cool, too. Just don't disappear forever, because you still have friends here. -
I leveled my characters to 50 because they were enjoyable. I continue to enjoy them long after I've "run out" of content. There are always tips and scanner/paper missions, RWZ/Cimerora/DA timed missions, etc. Never "nothing to do", only "nothing I feel like doing with this character right now".
-
The author owns the story itself, any unique characters created and any settings not portrayed or mentioned in the game/film/whatever, but he/she can't profit off of the work without paying the owner of the copyrighted work the story is set in, or that owner's permission (some copyright holders will happily allow others to use their material. some even invite others to do so, for free (or nearly free). Stephen King's famous "Dollar Deal" has launched many directors' careers (Dollar Babies), for instance. and sometimes, they're only holding that copyright to prevent large corporations from swallowing their work, retaining it to ensure that "the little guy" can use it freely. this is why things like the Creative Commons License exist, it's nearly impossible release something and not have it copyrighted, because someone else can pick it up and start running with it without the original creator's permission. releasing it under a CCL or similar license, though, ensures that it's always available for anyone, for free). Continuing the use of Mass Effect, if I decide to write a novel about a Quarian on her Pilgrimage and the ensuing adventures, I'm free to share that with the world, as long as I don't make a dime. If I want to make money off of it, I need Bioware's permission, or whoever owns Bioware's permission, or I need to arrange and sign a licensing agreement with that entity. Anything which has entered common use on a widespread basis can be used, as well. You can refer to someone as a Superman, and intend that to mean exactly what it sounds like. You can use a phrase like, "Superman punch!" (spoken in Glass), because that's calling on a well-known source which is prevalent in the public consciousness. You can refer to Superman when two characters are speaking, or a character is thinking, for the same reason, it's referencing something widely known and understood. Those are legitimate. You can't print t-shirts with the Superman logo and sell them. You can't write, ink and sell a comic and have Superman show up in it (unless it's satire or a parody). Those are strictly prohibited, unless you negotiate a license or otherwise obtain explicit permission from DC/Warner. Going back to the Mass Effect reference, if I publish that Quarian novel for sales, I'm liable to be sued. Quarians are not mine. The Migrant Fleet is not mine. Element Zero is not mine. Omni-tool is not mine. Things I used without permission from the owner and/or without negotiating compensation for the owner make me responsible for damages, court fees, fines and other levies. One of the primary reasons for copyright law existence is to ensure that the owner of copyrighted work is fairly compensated. Now, fan fiction sidesteps all of that because it's free. Or, at least, what I know of it indicates that it's given away for free (i avoid reading practically anything written online, these forums being an exception. most people can't spell, believe punctuation is "SANTANCE SEESINING", and wouldn't be able to properly construct a sentence to save their lives. reading bad English makes me angry, and i don't need to be angry at this point in my life). There's no profit being made, there's no money being channeled away from the copyright owner, so there's no violation of copyright law. The copyright holder can still issue a C&D, but they rarely do because it's essentially free advertising. Some copyright holders will even launch litigation if they imagine their copyright is being violated, having read or seen something with a bare semblance to their work, others just shrug and move on to the next project. But this is also why we have courts to deal with copyright issues, they're dispassionate and unbiased (in theory... sometimes less so in practice). If, or, as often as not, when one is accused of violating copyright law, changing the offending material typically satisfies the legal requirements to avoid penalties. If I change my Quarian to a Zorgoquatoidian, the Migrant Fleet to a wandering planet, Element Zero to refined dostuffium, and omni-tools to universal pliers, I'm in the clear. My story is less recognizable, it'll probably end up with the millions of other bad "Something: A Novel" books languishing at the bottom of Amazon's sales charts, but anything I do make off of it would be mine and I wouldn't have legal hassles to deal with. Does that sufficiently answer the question?
-
That's copyright law, not trademark law. They're similar, but not the same. However, as with trademark law, owning the goods or services which a third party used to create something does not grant the goods or service provider ownership of the creation. That was the purpose of that section of the EULA: to grant permission for NC to appropriate your creation(s), and they still would have had to register the copyrighted creation(s) for the applicable copyright laws to apply. NC "owns" Statesman under copyright law. NC "owns" Positron under copyright law. NC does not "own" ivanthehedgehog, they own a contract which you "signed" (clicked on the Agree button), granting them permission to use that character and forfeiting your rights to use said character in other mediums. They would still have to register said character to obtain copyright protection, as evidenced by the 1947 decision by the New York State Supreme Court, in which the Superboy character, which was created by Siegel while working at DC, was deemed to be wholly "owned" by Siegel, even though the character was created while under a work for hire contract with the publisher and within the Superman comic. As with trademark law, owning goods or services used in the creation of an original work does not, under any circumstances, grant that goods or service owner sole, exclusive or irrevocable control over the original work, or, in fact, any control or ownership of the original work unless a contract, endorsed by all parties, specifically grants it to them. That is what the EULA says and does. It grants NC the right to claim control of your unique works created within the game and file for copyright and/or trademark protection on those works, if they choose to do so. They don't own all characters in the game, they own the right to copyright all characters in the game. Your characters are still yours until NC actively exercises that option. "Ah", you say, "this means my characters' names are protected, I do 'own' them!". Well, that would be true if you filed for copyright protection on those characters (trademark protection wouldn't apply in that case, because you're seeking protection for the work itself, not the name. filing for trademark protection would require that the name represent a brand), but if you did file for copyright protection, you wouldn't be able to use those characters in the game. The EULA prohibits that, to protect NC. You can't create copyright protected characters in this game, even if you're the copyright holder (re: Marvel coming in and making Marvel characters in the CoH character creator, then filing litigation against Cryptic/NC for copyright infringement, and subsequently admitting in court that they were the ones infringing on their own copyrights, and violating Cryptic/NC's EULA by doing so). That's the other side of the EULA's protection, as applicable in this context. By wording it as they did, they accomplished two things. First, they ensured that they wouldn't have their pants sued off for infringement; and second, they keep your unique works from immediately falling into public domain. The second is key, and highly relevant to this topic. Copyright protection is not inherent, it's not a side effect of creating something, it doesn't automatically apply. You have to register the work to be copyrighted. George Romero failed to copyright Night of the Living Dead (technically, the distributor failed to do so), and, as a consequence, it immediately went into public domain when it was released in 1968. Were it not for the wording of the EULA, this is what would happen to all of your characters in Co*. But because the EULA gives NC the permission to seek copyright protection on all characters, at its discretion, your characters are kept out of public domain. Until either you or NC pursues protection on your characters, they exist in a Limbo between protection and public domain, thereby preventing yet another company from swooping in and "stealing" your unique works from you, because you gave NC permission to pursue copyright status on your works and they have "dibs", unless you revoke permission by deleting the character, at which time you can recreate the character outside of the game and copyright it, as long as you do it before someone else does. Until your works in this game are copyrighted, they're neither yours nor theirs, but also not anyone else's... and the names of those characters also don't belong to anyone exclusively, as they're not actually attached to copyrighted works, and don't represent a brand (for which trademark law would be applicable). Again, that's moving over to copyright law. Used in conjunction with the character, the name is part of a whole creation, thus, yes, subject to copyright law if the character is copyrighted. Used separately from the character, unless the name is part of a copyrighted work, it falls under trademark law. Batman is copyrighted and trademarked. Superman is copyrighted and trademarked. These are identifiable throughout the world and distinctly attached to specific, unique works which enjoy full legal protection. Your level 1 placeholder character with a name you want to reserve, your level 6 character you haven't looked at in 9 months, your level 19 character gathering dust on the 12th page of a character list, those aren't identifiable, they're not universally recognized, they're not copyrighted or trademarked by you, and thus, their names aren't protected by copyright law or trademark law. Nor does NC "own" them, as they haven't filed the necessary paperwork to legally transfer that "ownership" into their hands. All NC owns is that agreement between you and them which grants them permission to do so and denies third parties the right to do so. Nope. There are plenty of multiplayer games which permits multiple people to use the same name. No one person "owns" the name, no-one can claim infringement if someone else uses it, and everyone is uniquely identified in a different way (alphanumeric characters attached, @accountname attached, et cetera). And plenty more games which allow names to be unique, but still require players to perform some action in order to retain them, just like real trademark and copyright laws. Failing to renew trademark or copyright registration at regular intervals results in loss of protection. Failing to log a character in once in a while results in lost of protection. Same thing, for the same reasons. You don't "own" a name here, you control it, and when the name release system is enabled, you'll only control it for as long as you make the token effort to retain that control. If the name is that important to you, log the character in.
-
I just like ogling butts. And hitting things. While ogling butts. Also, butts.
-
Also incorrect. In addition to reminding you that no-one owns names, they can only be trademarked, I'll also point out that the provider of a good or service has no native right to what is created from or within that good or service by a third party. NC has no more claim of "ownership" of a name which they haven't specifically trademarked than a pencil manufacturer would. Adobe can't claim ownership of trademarked names, brands or logos simply because they were created in Photoshop. Computer manufacturers can't claim ownership simply because something was created on a computer they made. No-one can own a name, branding or logo created by someone else using their goods or services. No-one. The legal, societal, cultural and financial ramifications of such would be devastating. What NC "owns" is your permission to trademark your characters' names (trademark law) and likenesses (copyright law), which you expressly consent to when you accept to the EULA. And that permission still requires them to file the necessary registration paperwork with the USPTO and comparable agencies in other countries before it has any validity, before it attains exclusivity in regard to ownership of the trademark on the name, brand or logo.