Jump to content
Account validation emails are not going out, delaying registrations. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Solvernia

Members
  • Posts

    476
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Solvernia

  1. It's already possible.
  2. "They changed it, now it sucks."
  3. the following greatly help with your end drain: performance shifter chance for +endurance (put this in Stamina) panacea chance for +hitpoints/endurance (put this in Health) recovery serum (500k for 50 charges from P2W vendor) at level 50, you can start making a cardiac alpha incarnate ability, which reduces end costs globally even past the diminishing returns i've really never had any problems with end drain after slotting the IO procs and making frequent use of recovery serum
  4. ninja run is a really good travel power but the persistent 'crouching' animation messes with weapon sets (esp. no redraw ones) and looks kinda goofy in general. an 'alternate' power that's a carbon copy but that gets rid of the crouching animation when standing but keeps the running animation when moving would be nice to have it does bug me a little bit to see my character shooting beams from their gun at a 90 degree angle to the barrel
  5. trick arrow is already fixed, it's called tactical arrow now
  6. Not everyone is built for that, so don't go taking away Interrupt Rdx based on that assumption.
  7. this one time on live i knew a guy who had an elec/elec brute that was a minotaur his name Mu'Khau
  8. honestly the nemesis system was probably the only good part of CO but you can already make nemesis missions yourself in AE not sure if the amount of effort it'd take to implement it in standard content would benefit enough people for it to be worth
  9. yes there is, it's kinetics
  10. yeah they threw me out of the r/cityofheroes discord for taking every self-assignable role on the server (which i do in every server that has self-assignable roles because it's funny) because some of them were pronoun roles and taking all of the pronoun roles counts as "harassing LGBT people" i guess they want to be a LGBT server first and a CoH server second which is fine but not if they don't believe that genderfluid people exist
  11. can guarantee that if you pick 100 people at random from this server and ask them for their builds they will have 100 different builds for you to look at
  12. there are some things that are so good that you should have them, yes. for example, pool powers for optimized builds are usually "travel power, hasten, leadership, fighting" or some minor variation but otherwise there is a huge amount of flexibility in how you slot, and what powers you pick. nobody's going to force you to slot the knockdown enhancements, but it's a really good idea to do so, just as it's a really good idea to stick an Achilles Heel proc in every -def power this isn't really WoW where you must have this build or nobody will bring you to raids. don't worry about being able to do what you want
  13. hold down the right mouse button and you can mouselook at will, this is the standard for most 3D MMOs. WoW/Guild Wars/etc work the same way IDK if there's a mouselook toggle but considering clicking on things in the environment and UI are near-ubiquitous, I don't know if it'd be any good
  14. when you target someone you'll see they're level 50 the "veteran level" bit only shows up in their bio, albeit with the big words "VETERAN LEVEL" next to it
  15. super strength doesn't really thematically or mechanically fit scrappers but maybe if you swapped the rage for a buildup and tweaked some numbers then i guess?
  16. now that snipes are basically instant forever, maybe we can change the interrupt in sniper IO sets to range or something idk
  17. But everyone who plays this game already has a 100% different build. How more "AND VARIED" can you get?
  18. imagine if the guy who ran the auth server or owned the character database decided "hey i don't like X server anymore" and cut them off bad times ahead lads
  19. oh hey if we're pointing out logical fallacies now reminder that it is a logical fallacy to imply that, because an argument contains a logical fallacy, it is therefore invalid
  20. I think it's fine the way it is, honestly. Most people don't like it because they five-slot it for the 6.25% rech and miss out on the proc, which is supposed to help make up for the lack of direct enhancement. Maybe trade some of the excess damage for end reduction?
×
×
  • Create New...