Jump to content
Hotmail and Outlook are blocking most of our emails at the moment. Please use an alternative provider when registering if possible until the issue is resolved.

MunkiLord

Members
  • Posts

    2302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by MunkiLord

  1. Agreed. Stalkers should also get Titan Weapons too as far as I'm concerned.
  2. It wouldn't be my preferred version, but I'd accept it if that is how it ended up. Really I'm much more excited about the possibility of Stone Melee on Scrappers.
  3. I stand by my statement and how I have summed up all the opposition in this thread.
  4. It's really not worth further debate, because all the opposition can be summed up as "I don't like PvP, therefore I am against anything that will benefit the people that do like it." It's no more complicated than that.
  5. I recently remade mine, and it is indeed very solid. Softcap is stupid easy to attain, lots of room for Luck +7.5, so there is a lot of freedom in such a build. I don't like the way he spells "monkey"
  6. It was very obvious.
  7. This makes me happy.
  8. I wasn't saying that nobody would want to play it on Scrappers, just that one particular person. And changing the set and how doable and time intensive that may be is a perfectly reasonable explanation on why it may not happen, or not happen for a while. But I completely reject and dismiss people against it for concept reasons as them not wanting to play a set isn't a meaningful reason to keep others from playing it. Though as far as changes go, my preference would be to make the Rage bonus a smaller number for Scrappers and see how that plays out.
  9. This is an excellent point about PvP IOs! So since mulitple PvP rewards have already been made available via purely PvE means, parity and fairness would mean the request in the OP is a reasonable one. @kelly Rocket, this seems to be fair. PvE got something from PvP, so why oppose when the PvP people are asking for something as well?
  10. Again, if other people using SS on a Scrapper would ruin your fun time simply for concept reasons, that is a terrible opinion to have. If your enjoyment is partially or wholly dependent on keeping others from enjoying something, that's a 100% you problem. And if there is a set I don't like, I don't play it. It's really quite simple and not nearly as dramatic as you're making it out to be. Regardless of what sets do or don't get shared between the melee AT's, the Tanks unique identity as being the most easily replaced AT isn't going to change one bit. That's a problem that has nothing to do with hoarding powersets. And I don't care why the original developers made such a decision 15-20 years ago. The game has changed a lot since then and they are no longer in charge.
  11. I think if a setting was added to Null the Gull, then we should also have the option of adding KB to all our powers. Or at the very least the option to turn knockdown to knockback.
  12. This is fantastic suggestion! Not the solo part, I'm thinking that's impossible. But doing this as a team. So what kind of team do we think it would take to do this? All Defender, Controller, or Corruptor teams could probably manage it. So let's take it a step further, no repeating AT or powersets. What does everyone think would be a good team for such a challenge? Rad, Kin, and Cold buff/debuffs are the ones that immediately come mind. Time would be good here as well. My initial thinking is Blasters, Stalkers, and probably Scrappers might struggle more than most. Brute and Tank would be good for this. Doms are pretty squishy too, but the extra controls would be nice.
  13. This is a terrible opinion to have. If it was ported and you don't want to play it on Scrappers and Stalkers, then don't. Very simple. If other people enjoying and playing it would bother you, that's a 100% you problem.
  14. Hard pass. Choice is a good.
  15. Blaster all the way. It's an extremely powerful combo.
  16. Pure nonsense. If we're shooting for parity, then PvP is gonna get a whole lot more love than PvE. That's not really what you want, you just don't like PvP and are against it. Just like almost every other player's that shoots down any and all suggestions to improve it.
  17. This is a reasonable request to me. Most of the posts against this suggestion are simply because most people don't like PvP, so I don't find them credible. If this will largely make the PvP community happy, I'm all for it.
  18. If this means I can play an SS Scrapper I'm all for it.
  19. Ten million isn't a risk, it's a few minutes of time. I'm just saying make it interesting. How am I supposed to be entertained when there are no stakes?
  20. When I'm playing I don't want a single tank or brute to hold all the aggro. I want some too, otherwise it's boring if there is no threat. I'd pay billions of influence for a taunt aura on my Blasters.
  21. 10 million influence is a joke. You should make the bets worthwhile.
  22. If somehow we were able to gain access to old accounts, influence on those old accounts should be set to zero. This game definitely doesn't need all that influence flooding the market.
  23. THIS I mean it's cool if AVs move out of my Burn patch or away from Blizzard, that makes sense. But don't tuck tail and run half way across the map.
  24. If your Psi defense is intentionally that high, I'd drop that in favor of other positions/types and just carry a few extra lucks when you know you're gonna fight that sort of damage.
×
×
  • Create New...