A re-look at TF rules

[DrRocket]

Currently with TFs you can't replace players that dropped for whatever reason, once in a TF you can't stop and do another mission with another group etc.

 

I as thinking, how about removing these restrictions to some extent.

 

For example say a TF rewards you with 40 merits and it is composed of 8 missions, why not award merits upon completing each mission , in this sample 5 merits per mission completed. If this is done, if a player drops (real life) of the team; the team would be stuck trying to finish with one or  more players who dropped out of the team (I remember doing an LGTF and our 1 controller had to drop due to family emergency and then later had to do the Hami mission - it was ugly), by awarding as we go, and letting the leader recruit replacements, the ne player only gets a number of merits based on the number of completed missions they actually do. Of course, it would be reasonable if the number of merits for each mission be weighted instead of evenly distributed.

 

Many players solo Oro - TFs, by being able to accept invitations from other teams to do their TF, they can switch and help their friends, and later finish their Oro TF mission.

 

Those are 2 examples of relaxing the rules, provide a workable suggestion which may not be the best solution but it is offered as a "go by"

 

I had thought about the AV situation in TFs, and would like to see a relaxation here, if playing in a team up to 2, the end boss would be a Boss? at 4 an EB, 5 and 6 calls for an AV. Doing this for players who play at odd hours where getting groups together is extremely difficult, still would be able to enjoy the game content in a casual manner. Not sure about the brackets, some ideas here would be awesome!

 

If you all have any ideas on how to relax TFs and make them a bit more casual, would be awesome!

[MTeague]

I do think the TF badges should be restricted to players who were there for the entire Task Force.  Should not be awarded if you jumped in for the final mission. That said, a pro-rating of the reward merits based on the number of missions you were present for, doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Also, I don't know code-wise if this would be trivial or a massive PITA. No harm in asking, though. Worst case, they say no.

[Snarky]

11 hours ago, MTeague said:

I do think the TF badges should be restricted to players who were there for the entire Task Force.  Should not be awarded if you jumped in for the final mission. That said, a pro-rating of the reward merits based on the number of missions you were present for, doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Also, I don't know code-wise if this would be trivial or a massive PITA. No harm in asking, though. Worst case, they say no.

I agree that badges should be restricted to those doing the entire TF.  
 

This change would encourage people it is okay NOT to do the entire TF, thus making it harder on Tram Leaders, and possibly keeping the badge from all teammates.  “So long, get a replacement for me!”   
 

Hard NO

[Ghost]

Yeah I think this would just lead to more people treating TFs like missions, and just leaving part way through.

[LightMaster]

Agreed with the above. Not only that, there’s always the by-today’s-standards sphagetti codes that can end up causing whatever change done to TF system that can cause teammates kicked off for no reasons, akin to teammates getting kicked in an aligntment-mixed team when trying to go to Ouroboros in non-TF teams.

 

Not to mention the risk of ragequittings increased with no penalty of leaving if what the OP suggested is ever implemented.