Rudra

Dark Melee and Dark Blast have their equal and opposite reactions. Dark Melee is opposed by Energy Melee and Dark Blast is opposed by Energy Blast. Radiation Melee and Radiation Blast as alternate energy sets also work, and very much look like what I keep hearing players describe for their light sets when they color them in light colors.

Just so you know, you can filter by AT and powers already if you want. Not arguing against the ability to sort, just saying you can search by AT or powers (or name) currently.

I thought it actually could not be done?

Except she's a Blaster and personally, I wouldn't want any existing character to be changed just for the sake of a signature Sentinel character. Just have the devs come up with someone new.

And Red Widow. (Once in actuality and once partially to test Ghost Widow's, though Ghost Widow's was sabotaged so failed.) (Edit again: And Percy and War Witch.) (Edit: And all the times players resurrect each other.)

Except he is already stated to be a Corruptor.

Agreed with @FupDup. While Positron was changed from a Blaster to a Defender, let's not do that to poor Sister Psyche. You want a Sentinel signature character? Let's have a new character.

The damage I posted from the game is with standard ammo for Dual Pistols, not incendiary, cryo, or toxic. (Though I did the math wrong and had to go back to the post to lower two results and add the missing 4th result.) Common Sentinel nuke damage is 194.59 per what the game says, while standard ammo on Dual Pistols is doing 271.44 damage per what the game says. Though each of the 4 parts has a 60% chance of triggering (so 40% chance of not). Though incendiary ammo does add another 23.23 DoT after the initial damage, which is equal to the standard damage. (Edit: Unless the game is listing its damage twice.)(Edit again: And Dual Pistols weren't even part of your request. It was Full Auto and Rain of Arrows.)

Sure, more weapon options, if we can get them, are good.

No, I don't. Here, let me give the full quote of that statement: I don't know anyone that feels red side is not evil enough, chaotic enough, or selfish enough. I do know several people that aren't happy that you are typically a lackey/go-fer though. And yes, I know many villains are not evil incarnate, but are painted as such because of the extremes they take to accomplish their goals or because their methods clash with what the public is willing to tolerate or because they are simply demonized or any of several other reasons. However, the typical/basic view of anyone that doesn't delve into the philosophies, moralities, and other background information tends to be villain=evil regardless of what may be going on. And there aren't many people that I know of that are willing to jump into playing even a table top game with supers where they are playing the baddies. There are players like that, but most prefer to be the good guys. As for the rest of that quote? No, I have no idea where you are going with it. So precautionary statement: I oppose having PvP added to any PvE zone in any capacity (outside of the arena terminals).

Warhammer 40K is a science fantasy game. (Not even really sci-fi. It's Warhammer Fantasy with spaceships.) So it doesn't fall under the Superhero/Supervillain bit. Are there superheroes or supervillains in GTA? If there is, then it falls under what I was saying and I sit corrected. If there aren't? Then it doesn't. That's actually not what I am saying? I am saying that most people that come to play a superhero game do so to play as superheroes, because they prefer to be called good rather than evil. That gets into the philosophy that most people I know don't want to bother with. It's a game with superheroes and supervillains? Then obviously the supervillains are evil and cruel and ruthless and generally need a good stomping on. That is the view I hear from most people just discussing superheroes and supervillains in general, not just in this game. I'm not sure where you are going with this. However, as I have stated on multiple other threads, keep the PvP out of the PvE zones. There are lots of instances in which heroes go to the Rogue Isles and villains go to Paragon City. They are specific missions on set maps, typically after someone on the other side smuggles you in and gets you to where you need to be so the community of that zone doesn't butcher you. I actually agree with this statement. I don't see any out of game advertising for the game, but if all people see is the game name, they may not think they can play villains too. Once they get into the character creator though, there are two ways for them to find out they can play as a villain; at the start and at the end of making their character. (Edit: Hence my comment being that even new players to the game are not likely lacking in awareness of there being a playable villain side as it is in their faces twice while making characters.)

You're right. It should probably be forearm mounted rather than wrist-mounted.

So ask for 1-handed animations with a corresponding weapon hand. (Edit: Or use Savage Melee.) Edit again: Better yet? Ask for a hook hand weapon option.

I've heard the Monster Hunter response a few times. And I've seen it. I agree it looks crazy. (Edit: It doesn't look like bare-handed combat to me, just crazy. Like a lunatic about to get eaten by the critter.) As for the assault rifle request? Provide a wrist mount weapon to do that, and I'm all for it. Being able to turn weapon sets into integrated power armor abilities would be nice. However, it would still need a weapon model, in this case a wrist gun or a shoulder gun.

Let's go down the line again. Sentinel Nuke: Damage: Archery (Rain of Arrows) Summons pet that inflicts the damage. I'm not bothering with figuring it out. Assault Rifle (Full Auto) 138.308/57.195 damage Beam Rifle (Overcharge) 137.8187/56.7669 damage Dark Blast (Blackstar) 137.8187/56.7669 damage Dual Pistols (Hail of Bullets) 92.1541/37.9868/Swap Ammo used/not used (added damage) damage Electrical Blast (Thunderous Blast) 137.8187/48.937(?)/56.7669 damage Energy Blast (Nova) 137.8187/56.7669 damage Fire Blast (Inferno) 137.8187/56.7669/DoT 19.26897 damage Ice Blast (Blizzard) Summons pet that inflicts the damage. I'm not bothering with figuring it out. Psychic Blast (Psychic Wail) 137.8187/56.7669 damage Radiation Blast (Atomic Blast) 137.8187/56.7669 damage Seismic Blast (Meteor) Summons pet that inflicts the damage. I'm not bothering with figuring it out. Sonic Attack (Dreadful Wail) 137.8187/56.7669 damage Storm Blast (Category Five) Summons pet that does lots of crazy stuff. No way in hell am I tackling that. Water Blast (Geyser) 68.8788/tidal power (63.6429-79.86498)/56.7669 damage So as you can see, all the Sentinel nukes do approximately the same damage. (All data pulled from City of Data https://cod.uberguy.net/html/archetype.html?at=sentinel for Sentinel nukes.) They all have the same recharge at 90 seconds and the same END cost at 15.6. So what is the problem with them? Edit: From the game: Archery: 130.53/53.76 Assault Rifle: 152.13/62.92 Beam Rifle: 137.82/56.77/24.48 Dark Blast: 137.82/56.77 Dual Pistols: 39.6/96.12/39.6/96.12 Electrical Blast: 137.82/56.77/48.94 Energy Blast: 137.82/56.77 Fire Blast: 137.82/56.77/27.54 Ice Blast: 148.83/61.09 Psychic Blast: 137.82/56.77 Radiation Blast: 137.82/56.77 Seismic Blast: 137.82/56.77 Sonic Attack: 137.82/56.77 Storm Blast: 139.2/57.57 Water Blast: 68.88/tidal power (68.64-86.13)/56.77

No, the difficulty scale is +0-4/x1-8. However, on a character that never had their difficulty changed while playing the game, the difficulty shows as +0/x0. There is no x0 difficulty, but it shows that for some reason on all characters that never have their difficulty (for team size) changed. Once you change your team size, it is impossible to get back to x0 because it does not actually exist.

Just so you know, the mutually exclusive in single power set alternate powers have been declared by the devs as not ever going to happen again because of how much of a royal pain it was to make work in the 1 set that has it currently.

I have to disagree that (new) players go blue side because they are not aware of red side. It may say "City of Heroes Freedom" and "City of Heroes Going Rogue" on the initial page where you select your origin, but also says quite clearly on that same page that players can be a hero or a villain. Then when they go to finish character creation if they choose to skip the tutorial, it flat out asks them if they are playing a hero or a villain. And if they choose to go into any of the tutorials, it quite plainly says which tutorial is for heroes, which is for villains, and which is neither (but lets them choose what they want to be in it). So there is ample notice that (new) players can play as villains. And experienced players (either returning to the game or already playing it) already know they can make a villain. So it isn't a lack of awareness that I can tell. I do have to agree with the statements previously made by others that it most likely is because players come to play as superheroes and have a dislike for supervillains. After all, not many people want to play as a character that per (child friendly) comics and cartoons exist solely to be beat up by the heroes and lose over and over again. (Edit: Or kick puppies for fun. Or beat up little, old grannies before tossing them on the street in front of oncoming traffic. Or blow up buildings that their friends may have been inside. So on and so forth. It isn't like a fantasy game where players are typically willing to play either side. In fantasy, these days those evil orcs are often portrayed as honorable but misunderstood beings fighting for a purpose, sometimes imposed upon them. Or other reasons. Heck, 2nd edition D&D created a means of players playing drow by having a kind/benevolent offshoot that explain to non-drow players that the drow remember when they lived on the surface and were good, and they want to go back to that, but Lolth prevents it. An 'evil' side in fantasy has already been explored in surprising detail for good and evil in fantasy not being black and white like it used to be, even casting "evil races" as being forced to be evil but with a desire to be good. [Edit again: Even current versions of D&D, Pathfinder, and other fantasy games often portray evil races as not evil per se, but evil in general as enemies with good ones being around to help the players or be player characters themselves. So they are less evil and more different and typically hostile when encountered.] Superheroes and supervillains however? Especially when you know the content red side is all about conquest, greed, destruction, or other traits many people don't want associated with them? Supervillains are "evil" and there is a mental block in getting people to accept that may not necessarily be so, especially when the content reinforces it. Note however, I am not asking for red side to change.) Edit yet again: TLDR: My best guess is players prefer blue side because they don't like being evil. It works for fantasy but not so much for supers. You can have a good aligned mind flayer, but you can't have a good aligned villain. Doesn't matter if you play your good aligned mind flayer paladin or your superhero as a genocidal murderer, as long as on 'paper' they are good people.

It's there for me. (Edit: Try zooming in more to get past the clutter.) (Edit again: Or try mousing over that point on the map to see if it jumps out like it did for me.)

That still requires a change to the code, not just turning it back on. Which is part of what I am saying. If all the devs do is turn it back on, then it will function exactly like it did back on Live sans possibly any existing changes that were already made. And if prestige is to work even more differently than that? Especially if t is to track things it did not back on Live? It has to be recreated. Which given the known nature of the game code, would result in a completely different function being made from the ground up.

Oh? So you know what the dev actually meant? So you were the dev in question? This is another thing MMOs already were doing and had. You can have different zones that different factions use more often than not. Villains could have been encouraged to stick towards their areas more very easily..... but, again, saying these excuses is a good way to get players onboard with buying another expansion and explaining why it can't be one game that all players can access without opening their wallets... lol So you are saying... that the devs should have made new zones, which they did. And again, you obviously must have been the dev since you obviously know what the dev meant better than the dev that was explaining the City of Villains expansion to the rest of us. (Edit: So I guess the Live devs were lying to us too when they introduced the arenas to the game and told us it was going to be a taste of what City of Villains would be like too while giving them an opportunity to see if there were any issues with the PvP system?)

Not really, no. City of Villains exists for several reasons. One of the reasons that got mentioned when it was launched was because of PvP. Heroes and villains fight each other (and always have in the game since CoV was launched). And the devs didn't want the fledgling villain community to start the game and then quit because they were getting clobbered by the vast multitude of already established player heroes smacking them for trying to commit crimes in their city. While I don't believe that was a major reason, it was a dev stated reason for the separated zones. Another reason was to give villains a place that felt more villainous than the bright and cheery Paragon City, with access to new factions and new areas to explore that heroes did not have. Remember, when City of Villains launched, there were no rogues or vigilantes. You were a hero or a villain. (Also remember that PvP did not function differently than PvE like it does now. PvP functioned exactly like PvE for how powers worked, so if the zones had been combined, we were looking at PvP in all of the zones with no Siren's Call, Bloody Bay, or Warburg coming into existence.) Making the Rogue Isles meant: Villain characters could run around their zones and accomplish their tasks without hero characters hunting them down before the villain character can get developed. New factions could be introduced to the game without needing to displace existing factions. New zones could be available for players to explore. New ATs could be introduced without stepping on the existing ATs. (At the time. Proliferation ended that.) New content could be added without having to de-conflict with existing lore for more evil characters to do. A hidden faction (Arachnos) could be further explored. (Ernesto Hess blue side used to give out an Arachnos pin to the heroes that did his TF as thanks for helping Arachnos before CoV.)

When you say this, it sounds like you would have to pay for your component again if ever turned back on. Turning it on does not have to be associated with it paying for your components. If you can turn something 0, you can keep it at 0, while the thing 0 references is accumulating again What I am saying, is that if all the devs do is turn prestige back on, it will not do anything other than what it did back on Live. With base items having a 0 prestige cost and base rent (hopefully) never coming back, then it would track nothing and be used for nothing other than what it did back on Live. So if base items remained de-linked and base rent stayed dead, players would give up their inf' gains to build up prestige while in SG mode, and that is all it would do. If you want it to do something else, anything else, a whole new mechanic would have to be made. And it still would not be as simple as turning prestige back on. It would have to be created from the ground up, given the same name as the existing non-functional mechanic called prestige, and hoped that because now there are two such mechanics with the same name, doesn't cause code problems.

Yes, x0 difficulty is x1 difficulty. I don't know why it sits at x0 for a new character, but when you check the difficulties, it is only from x1 to x8. However, while I understand it annoys you, I actually get a kick out of it. I enjoy seeing several of my characters at x0 difficulty and avoid changing their difficulty just so I can keep that display. Might I suggest just changing your new characters' difficulty displays to the minimum x1 instead? Please don't take this away from me.

Uhm... sorry, no offense, but you need to use a better translator. I don't really understand what you are saying.