eldriyth

But it couldn't have gone down if it was reversed...The OP wanted to option to make it look more like how she looks in real life...Can't see the gender's switching in that scenario. So in this case, sexist and personal But even hypothetically, I would call a woman sexist if she said that women with small chests are practically men, and that you should be proud to have a fictional large chest... She's a big girl. She can come on here and tell me off herself. You're on a video game forum trying to protect this woman because you think it will make her like you. Seems like you have a permanent residence in the friend zone. I wasn't being sexist in my post, take away hips and boobs on a model and what do you get? A male looking model. If you look or want to look more boyish than just use that model (for now) as there are no other options available. I jumped on her train for human body modification and shapes, because having an overweight kingpin thug mastermind wouldn't be a bad idea in a fantasy perspective.

No, it isn't sexism. It's tactism. Telling ANYONE to be calm and passive when arguing on the internet is just good advice. If you claim that it's sexism then you're probably trying to start an argument where one is not warranted. Or else you believe that anyone who has a disagreement with you while knowing that you're a woman is being sexist. Listen to the wisdom of an argument or the lack of it in the argument, and respond to that. Adding in side notions of "if you say this then you're sexist" just makes me think that you're trolling. Telling anyone to be passive is a bad idea...People should be assertive...not aggressive, not passive...They don't have to lay down and take it just because it's the internet. The OP shouldn't have to "go along" with gender based insults she received. It triggers me, and I'm a guy... And she certainly wasn't aggressive or mean in her response...just stating that insulting her was hurtful... So it coming across a bit, unfair True, but she used the word "passive" in her post. I just didn't want to change it in the reply. I agree, she shouldn't be PASSIVE, she should just be polite. And I don't see where there were gender-based insults. Someone said that a character could be made with large breasts who is hot, but that's all... I don't see how that implies that someone without large breasts cannot be hot. It feels like there is a rush to be offended in this thread, and it is taking the tone downhill. Fast. Is it really unusual to read something disagreeable and just disagree with it, without being offended? Didn't you hear? This is the age of special snow flakes.

Yes, because hinting "you mad bro?" is an AWESOME way to keep the conversation flowing.

No, it isn't sexism. It's tactism. Telling ANYONE to be calm and passive when arguing on the internet is just good advice. If you claim that it's sexism then you're probably trying to start an argument where one is not warranted. Or else you believe that anyone who has a disagreement with you while knowing that you're a woman is being sexist. Listen to the wisdom of an argument or the lack of it in the argument, and respond to that. Adding in side notions of "if you say this then you're sexist" just makes me think that you're trolling. Telling anyone to be passive is a bad idea...People should be assertive...not aggressive, not passive...They don't have to lay down and take it just because it's the internet. The OP shouldn't have to "go along" with gender based insults she received. It triggers me, and I'm a guy... And she certainly wasn't aggressive or mean in her response...just stating that insulting her was hurtful... So it coming across a bit, unfair I love your statement that says: People should be My dude, you just told me in 3 words what YOU think I should be doing and thinking. You don't control people's thoughts and actions. With that said: how about you start using a proper format for your sentence and paragraph structure? Because I do not like how you like to space out your sentences like this.

If you want to level as fast as humanly possible you're doing it wrong with DFB and normal content. There is a reason there are shitloads of spine/fire brutes all over the place. They are not only farmers, but they are insane power levelers. If you want 50 as bad as it looks, you need to get a 2nd account going, follow the spine/fire guides, and just PL that character to 50. Than use that character to PL your other toons to 50. I have 3 50s now doing this. Way faster than relying on other people sucking up your exp.

Enjoying the torment of others is not well-adjusted. There is a sadistic side within you if you like bad-guys. I wasn't "attacking" the OP I was more-so stating that this is a fictional video game and having a good-looking male/female super hero/villain is not the end of the world. No matter what you look like IRL. She wants a flatter chested female because it reflects what she has IRL? Don't stop there though, let's get in some beer bellies, muffin tops, and other body types too. Might not be a bad idea if the devs actually have time for it. No troll: OP, I have decided to support your request. I want more body types though as stated above.

Just make a male character... You obviously rather hide all female qualities that make men and women vastly different from each other. I don't have a six-pack IRL but I make badass FIT looking super villains and play them regardless. You should be proud of a hot female FICTIONAL SUPER HUMAN in a sci-fi video game. It sort of sounds as if you're saying that women who don't have a huge chest can't be attractive, and are basically just men. Is that really what you mean to say? Because as a woman with a small chest, that's really a very hurtful thing to say, if that's really what you meant. I'm a total jerk I admit. You have to be to play a villain after all. My point was: Why are you caring what your fictional character looks like in game? Why are you trying to mimic what you look like IRL?

Just make a male character... You obviously rather hide all female qualities that make men and women vastly different from each other. I don't have a six-pack IRL but I make badass FIT looking super villains and play them regardless. You should be proud of a hot female FICTIONAL SUPER HUMAN in a sci-fi video game.

Stop trying to make people play they game the way you want them to play it. I agree honestly.. If people want to spend more time than getting PLed by a spine/fire brute to hit 50 in DFB. Let them. Who cares when there are faster methods? You guys are responding to something that was said 2 1/2 weeks ago...DFB was nerfed since this thread, and we've all moved on... 2 1/2 weeks on a forum is like what 2 years in real life, and 12 in dog years? Thanks for adding absolutely nothing worth while to read to this thread.

Agreed. Dfb has overwhelmed lfg. Stop trying to make people play they game the way you want them to play it. I agree honestly.. If people want to spend more time than getting PLed by a spine/fire brute to hit 50 in DFB, let them. Who cares when their are faster methods? Hell, level 50 is just the beginning. Incarnates are where it's at for progression.

I've played on homecoming since you launched it. There is a small decline even on the weekends happening, because people just go and play other stuff that comes out. Especially with WoW Classic coming in August. Every MMORPG goes through it. Overall what this means though, is you guys can afford to loosen up the limitations on salvage held in bases from 1800 to 10000 at least, because there aren't as many players now.

I think these changes are solid my guy. You guys should focus on making every AT aside from Brutes better honestly. All of the ATs solo +4/8 content would be clutch and fair.

ZOMGZ a blaster can hit 1 NPC really hard! Let's not complain about the next door brute killing +4/8 content like it's a joke. (should know I do this myself lol) I think the changes are fine. Blasters and pretty much every other AT need love.

I am currently working on the same exact build with my Mastermind. Beast/Cold is fantastic in the defense department because beasts have natural defense powers of 15%+ To melee/range/aoe on top of Arctic Wind, Ice Shield, Maneuvers, etc. I calculated like 58% defense to ALL with full incarnates and boosters. Very damn good defense along with 35%+ resistance from the set bonuses. To answer your question: The alpha doesn't really do much different than the other wolves sadly. I thought it would have maneuvers or tactics going.

90% Brutes 10% other classes

eldriyth, you don't deserve to have everyone pile on you, but you are the only one who didn't see it. ::) I admit I didn't read the entire thing from top to bottom. I usually skim over stuff. He's changing it to read pet class better for skimmers like myself. Hell, if I read that it was a pet class I would of paid more attention to it. I'll admit that was my fault though. I'm man enough to admit that lol.

The summon pupil thing I missed. If it is a pet class, it sounds kind of neat. The way you mentioned partner up above sounded like another player. It's just the way you worded it my guy. I like pet classes and another one would be pretty cool. A big chunk of the post keeps talking about the single pet you have :) Anyways, this is a really cool idea, but the main seller to me is the AoE armors. That's just a really cool concept to have a bunch of Grant Cover type abilities you can share. As quoted from OP: The Defense/Support powers are mostly PBAoE so it encourages the player to wade in alongside their [glow=red,2,300]Partner[/glow], but the AT could reasonably be played with a focus around supporting their [glow=red,2,300]Partner[/glow] from a distance. Just put PET.

The summon pupil thing I missed. If it is a pet class, it sounds kind of neat. The way you mentioned partner up above sounded like another player. It's just the way you worded it my guy. I like pet classes and another one would be pretty cool.

I know you put a lot of thought and work into this post so I'll be gentle with you. The idea sounds pretty handicapped. Having to rely on another player to get anywhere is completely pointless when you have solo AT builds trashing +4/8 like nothing when they reach Alpha 3 (A3). This whole teamwork mentality might be fun to you, but with how this game currently plays, it's just a meh AT that serious players wouldn't touch. I guess it's okay for couples or boxers. *shrug* I give you credit for trying to be original though.

No need to re-invent the wheel. Just use the cheap brute build Mez provides and move to the stronger more expensive one as you get INF. I still run the cheap build and do +4/8 like it's a joke. Make sure to aim for A3 ASAP after hitting Veteran 3. If you're not sure what A3 is: It's Alpha 3rd or higher rank which will grant your character a level shift. This makes you 1 level stronger in power, literally turning a +4 into a +3 in power for the same rewards as +4. This is how you farm +4 effectively.

Oh, I guess we're done here, then. EVERYBODY OUT OF THE SUGGESTIONS & FEEDBACK BOARD, WE'RE SHUTTING IT DOWN. ELDRIYTH'S SUGGESTION FOR A TIME- AND RESOURCE-CONSUMING COSMETIC IMPROVEMENT WASN'T ADDED TO THE INCREDIBLY COMPLEX MMO BY THE VOLUNTEERS RUNNING THE FREE SERVERS WITHIN THE REQUIRED TWENTY-FOUR-HOUR TIME LIMIT, SO CLEARLY THEY'RE HORRIBLE, LAZY, UNCARING MONSTERS WHOSE ONLY JOY COMES FROM WATCHING US SUFFER. There, that should get people to pay attention to you. Whatever works.

This tells me that you don't even have an A3 toon. All ATs are complete trash before A3. There is nothing wrong with Super Reflexes or the current system. This is a Pebkac error. /jranger

I told you they don't care at all.

This is totally balanced.

I already made a post about the arrows. They are total garbage right now. They don't read these boards or care though.