ZeeHero

Becuase that doesn't help the solo tanker and soloing is also an important part of the game. That PLUS a solo buff like defenders get would be great though.

Jack Emmert's character was supposed to be able to solo GMs.. and it makes no sense to make that out of reach for player characters. the whole "you'll never be as good as this guy" is one of many big reasons DCUO sucks so hard.

Honestly increasing damage on tankers has to happen. they should not be doing half or less the damage of brutes given how close brutes come to doing the exact same job just as well in endgame. and damage is IMPORTANT for all roles and ATs as it is the only way enemies can be defeated in the end. a tanker should be doing at least 60% brute damage tbh. if not 70% if nothing changes about brutes.

Tanks dont have 2 roles. they have 3. the 3rd being damage which is a role of every AT becuase damage is the most basic gameplay mechanic without it nothing ever gets done. DPSy ATs are of course expected to output significantly more. this is why tankers should not be doing less than half the damage of an AT which takes damage nearly as well- the overpowered brute.

What I meant is that by very simple logical deduction its bad for new people coming in as all the good sounding names will inevitably be taken, hence being bad for the game long term. Whether unique names make more sense to you than non unique names IC is irrelevant. what matters is people being happy with their character names.

Given that they have like no HP (the MM themselves) the pets damn better take threat.

Backwards thinking. the Sentinel is a great idea. However giving it aggro management can cause issues. Sturdy ranged characters are fine. ones which can hold threat reliably.. theres an argument against that. So, in short, ranged characters should not be AS invincible as tankers... but they sure as hell can be as tough as scrappers or so.

How about fixing the issue with the original aggro management AT (Tanker) before making new ones please? Once tankers actually are as desireable as brutes, we can talk about new ATs which can do the same job.

Could play FFXIV and not WoW classic, I play that and COH. but jokes aside I am not sure snake bottoms would work for PCs for animation reasons.

Unique naming systems suck and are an obsolete relic, however I dont think it can be changed in COH. It's irrelevant if you believe it makes "more sense" for the names to be unique becuase the fact is the result of doing so means the longer the game runs and the more characters are made the less good names remain and the less concepts become doable with half decent names. thus making it objectively bad for the game. Not that it can be changed, but theres a lot of good things about the game. Unique names are definitely not one of them.

This would be impossible to implement becuase how would the game know if you're actually RPing?

I want to be action figure sized literally plz.

FF proc can be up all the time if you put it on multiple powers. and I thought hasten was 70% which is less.

That may be fine and dandy that a snail one shots people but without a plausible explaination on how it does that nobody will like or possibly even accept the narrative.

Hell at her peak (not yet reached power) one of my characters can easily lift something weighing a lot more than a navy destroyer. this doesn't mean she can't start at street level or maybe a bit above it. ability to use powers effectively is based on practice much like in mutants and masterminds how power levels can increase.

I would like to be able to customize lore summon costumes.

I mean if the story doesn't make sense to those participating or the audience it's not a good one so whats appropriate will vary.

Like I said we have friendly fire in the form of confusion. if you like it so much go do Avatar of Hamidon in underground and attack during that. I'm sure everyone else will love it.

Nobody wants their horse to be high. it's not safe to ride a high horse.

I would suggest the name "Guardian" for an AT like that, although arguably it would make a good support AT name as well.

if only pets had no collision no one would be having this discussion.

So what you just said is... if Rularu the Ravager comes down to the streets of paragon city and we fight him we are all street level heroes for that event. makes a kind of literal sense but a literal sense only. However many of my heroes begin their journey at street level. even the mighty astera (an incarnate) starts her career there as she learns to control and use her vast potential power, and as it grows she steps up to higher and higher threats. theres a sort of progression. also the reason why retcons and universe restarting events happen in comics. An incarnate is absolutely NOT a god. they are not all powerful, there are threats which would stomp an un aided incarnate such as battallion or rularu. Astera for all her power is mortal although she may not age, and can be at least theoretically killed. Mortal MEANS able to die.

There is. a bad build or not using IO sets.

The game needs to be balanced around performance as well as fun. if a set is bad, it needs to be fixed and whether people still find it fun is irrelevant.

I mean... they could level scale some of the lower missions and make some "endgame" street sweeping for those who enjoy limiting themselves to that I guess.