golstat2003

I don't think they are balancing around procs, but Captain can correct me if wrong. EDIT: But the idea to add it to some attacks might be a good one. (Despite how I think Bruising just needs to be outright replaced with something more useful).

Despite some of the hyperbole in this thread most regular non-forum reading players aren't. And we sure as hell shouldn't be balancing around that assumption.

In a game where 8 anything can go to town and not be stopped . . . yeah I don't think the trinity was all that important here. Syngergy/teamwork/the mentoring system Paragon developed I think is why folks love this game. Not the aspect of other games where you can't do content until you spend an hour or more spamming channels "looking for tank".

That domain that comes from the trinity is something that needs to go in modern mmos. The trinity to me was always something that this game didn't enforce. And thankfully so. The more we move away from that the better.

I'd be fine with them leaving bruising in with the AoE range and target count changes. And fine with it dropping the cap to 575. Whether 575 or 600 doesn't matter in realistic play scenarios.

Many folks would strongly disagree (and have in this thread). The amount of debuffing to be found while teaming won't make AV fights last any longer, if bruising were gone. And Tankers needs something better than what bruising currently provides. Most teams aren't constantly fighting AVs 24/7. Guess we agree to disagree.

And I'm fine with that. Brusing was not something that ever impressed me. And apparently not a lot of others who simply don't roll tanks because of the anemic damage. And saying you have to take procs just reinforces that. Remember that the balance point here is SOs NOT IOs. So saying procs are option is great, but it doesn't address the damage problem many people have with the AT.

Honestly I would not mind a rework. I find things that are up some of the time and crash after some use to be . . . not great design. The change to making nukes crashless done a few years back I think was beautiful work.

A visual effect that most players won't notice. A majority probably never even knew tanks do that. Ask them if they know what a glowing green toggle does on a mob and THAT they will probably have noticed and be able to tell you. Let's keep it real. Though, glad it's at least in the description. I'm fine if the -resistance is moved to something else on tanks or not. Once again I really don't care if a tank brings that. If I want debuffing I'm asking for any of the other ATs that do it better. And if I want to focus on debuffing I'll play one of them. It's never been a concern when I play a tank. lol

What she said.

OMG now I remember why I stopped playing mms on live. LMAO!

This is very similar to how an ability called Enrage works in another superhero mmo who shall not be named. 😜 I would not mind if Rage were changed to this. Or if an extra power were added that does this, that SS can take as an option. (You would be blocked from taking Rage if you took this power.) VEATs have this tech in their level up screen.

I would not mind if they did this and called it a day. But I am sure it would cause an uproar if you couldn’t stack it anymore.

/shrug Insignifigant. I’d rather have better all around damage and AOE potential to help me hit more targets at once, than bruising. I do a lot more teaming overall where we aren’t fighting AVs. AV debuffing is not a concern I care about on melee when I have teammates who can pretty much melt any resistance/defense AVs may have. Caring about bruising just was never on my mind while playing a Tank. I’d bet the average player on Homecoming would notice more AOE damage than bruising.

Thanks for screenshotting and describing some sanity into this discussion! Lordy!

And I should have been clearer in my earlier exchange. I'm fine with all the changes for Tankers. I would have prefered something that makes them tank better, but I guess them doing more damage helps with that? Not really sure what you could have given them to differentiate them more from Brutes. Again if I want something to hold aggro I invite or play a tank. If I want melee damage I invite or play a Brute or Scrapper.

I thought the original devs said that Masterminds were supposed to be the tankers of COV 🤣 I played scrappers to death on live. Time for something different. I never think Brute when I'm inviting someone to a team to hold aggro. I usually just invite the AT meant for it: Tanks. If I want more damage I usually invite Brutes.

The point of playing a brute is because I don't want to take Taunt and hold aggro, which tanks are expected to. If I want to tank I'll play a Tank and take Taunt. If I just want to be difficult enough to kill but still do damage and not be expected to hold aggro for the entire team, I'll play a Brute.

/shrug. That's fine. i'm just giving alternatives. I think that's as viable to try as simply "canceling the raid".

You can schedule a raid and not announce it on any channel and be done before anyone notices. I remember folks doing just that on live. That is what I meant by a "private" raid. Probably should have said "non-advertised". Also it should be easier to spawn a second "Hive" now. So there is that.

Griefers don't care if you cancel the raid. That's their goal. With that said your first suggestion is more realistic. Simply don't make the raids public anywhere. Done.

New Incarnate abilities and trials. New powersets. New Epic ATs that take on some of the iconic groups like a Freakshow Epic AT, or Circle of Thorns, or Council, or PPD. 🙂 Finish up the parts of the game the devs couldn't when the game was taken away from them. 😞

In all the time I"ve been back since around late April/May I have never seen anyone talk about herding at all. I've seen it done once, but it was just something that sprang up naturally. Also haven't seen folks complain about KB as much as on live. Maybe I've just been lucky to get on really chill teams. Also I've never seen anyone complain about KB on incarnate teams.

Yeah if the command is being exploited I agree with it being removed. And something else being put in place to easily share bases with others. And to make it easier to get to your base, without it being instant.

If the deal goes through, sure. Until then, no.