golstat2003

We can discuss suggestions as much as we want, it’s up to the dev team to decide to make changes. Just don’t expect changes anytime soon.

Fairy Terribad Terribad Fairy Baddy Fairy TerriFairy Baddest Fairy I could go on. lol

Bro chill. Frostbiter is actually not that original. One of the ways you can get the name you want is to add extra characters or tense. So yeah would not be suprised to see variations of "Frostbite" easily taken. Especially in a game where you can easily make characters having to do with ice control.

Well yeah the game is thankfully not balanced around min maxed builds. It's just ONE of the many things taken into account. The devs have said repeatedly (whether a lot of forum regulars like it or not) that the game is not balanced around IOs.

I like it. And it's not really a drawback when building fury isn't really an issue.

oh boy . . . . lol EDIT: I hope the eventual solution is changes to Brutes that ALL or at least 90% of Brute players can agree to. Not another nerf to Tanks. EDIT: The Brute ATO should at the very least be updated.

That is also my other fear when these types of suggestions come up. That the eventual soluton "becuase powercreep" will be to harshly nerf Tanks, while doing little for brutes.

Pretty much this. Also after the Fire Armor changes . . . I am very way when I see someone suggest changes they think everyone wants that might very make a set or AT worse for multiple players of said set or AT.

Right, then the devs should be looking at the numbers on actual performance.

In those cases where multiple players are saying different things (in this case there is definetly NOT any consensus at all on Brute performance from players) I would hope the devs then look at the related numbers.

I mean . . . the devs are the ULTIMATE spreadsheet nerds . . . so yeah. EDIT: And yeah . . . "this feels great" for balancing a game . . . err would not be great. LOL

Absolutley nothing. Just more bait making it easier to get this thread perma locked. EDIT: If folks actually want to debate this and take it seriously, maybe personal attacks should be left off the table. But that's just me. Saying "I don't agree with the proposed change to Brutes as it would change how I and other play brutes" is not a negative thing or an attack. Not every suggestion is going to be meant with a chorus of "yes I agree". Pointing out the cons of a suggestion does not go againts the ruiles or point of this forum.

That's cause the playerbase at large rarely if ever reflects the forums. I always take complaints on the forums with a grain of salt Seeing how the devs can actually datamine who actually plays what . ..

And what do you do for players who keep their travel powers on while attacking? If they do this it should ONLY be an option you pick in a setting. It should not apply for everyone. Some folks have their build set up so that they can attack and run travel powers at the same time. That should NOT change.

As a DA toon was my frist 50 on live (and I've thus recreated that toon about 3 times here on Homecoming) I have to agree. Please leave it alone. Don't want to see it unncessarily gutted due to "/powercreep" worries.

anyone have a good Arse Psi build? Just got mine to 50 and trying to see if anyone has already conquored this beast? lol

Better and more likely to be considered by the devs versus the original suggestion.

That's true of every event. Even more so for the halloween one. With that said I mostly avoided Mapserver as every one I was on seemed to lag even more than rikti and zombie invasions. The frist time I experienced the slide show I just wrote them off completely. Glad others enjoyed it though.

Not wotrth the dev time this would take. As has been said, Null the Gull is available in Pocket D

Devil’s advocate doesn’t mean denying reality.

Worth the ban if you ask me. GG sir/ma’am!

Thanks for all the work you and the original team did when this was originally live. Especially on Power Customization!!! Welcome home.

They are busy improving the game and (now legitimately) continuing its legacy. Or also known as “ain’t nobody got time for that”. HC, disagree with their changes to COH or not, has always been focused on their goals and kept it classy. Can’t say the same for some other servers.

It would be interested if some of the ideas in this thread came true, including this one. Would spice things up.

As others have said if they add more slots they should be limited to just incarnate content. More of them trivializing the game are NOT needed at all. EDIT: Just as I'm against nerfing the existing ones, I'm against adding more UNLESS they are limited to existing incarnate content.