tidge

I really liked this idea, until I realized that there would be a new class of farming to create alts just to collect the seed money. As I noted, I typically seed all my new characters with Inf, so this was the source of the initial appeal.

I am unsure of a way to objectively measure an individual AT's damage-dealing performance on a 8-player team.

There is this chestnut: "The game is not balanced around IOs" We are each repeating things that have been said many times, so I'll repeat this: the type of content where the differences between Scrapper and Brute performances show the above types of differences are not representative of most of the game's content... if anything, those areas are quite narrowly specified. There is so little juice to be squeezed out of this argument that it sounds like simply wanting one more drop of juice than someone else might have.

Why is there a thought that Brutes should meet or exceed Scrapper performance by this one measure?

This is essentially what I did, although I put a macro in my power tray to do it.

TBH, on Tankers I would often try to lean into the Leadership pool (and similar ally-benefiting Destiny, Hybrids) specifically to buff teammates, especially those that have to stand within melee range of the enemies I'd be tanking. Even though @Maelwys and I landed on different sides of the buff/debuff idea... I think we have some evidence that the devs (and certainly some players) are hyper-focused on damage differential at an extreme edge of performance (where several ATs are already narrowly clustered around some impressive times). I wouldn't recommend a change to Brutes based on what @Maelwys or I have proposed, only because the reaction would be "you ruined my favorite character"... and I think this reaction would be less histrionic *1 (if Brutes became buffer/debuffers) than the claims that Brutes are ruined because Scrappers/Tankers outperform them by 1% per "Ston tests". (*1) A radical change like we propose would almost certainly require respecs across the board, and if the Fury was granting a enemy debuff (or ally buff) it is hard to imagine Brutes staying within 1% of other melee AT, per whatever measure.

I think I understand the complaint (it sounds like one I share!) but in practice I've found that the colors I choose for one set are often not a good fit (i.e. they don't match) for a different set.

A couple of rando comments: AFAIK, the Steadfast Protection set piece recipes are only 20 Merits each, so not a big deal for someone who can explore some low-level zones and do a couple of lowbie arcs. For Purple/PVP recipe drops, in my experience it is approximately 50% chance of a drop for clearing the equivalent of 4 'fully loaded' mission (x8) full of non-con-gray critters. This isn't specifically relevant to the OP, except that the OP somewhat glossed over how almost everything (recipes, crafted IOs, salvage) is fungible via the market because of 'bucketing'. the market makes things easier to acquire without having to rely only on Inf. Finally: I want to comment that "target farming" used to somewhat exist for things like PVP recipes, and from a certain PoV... ATO/Winter pieces. The latter don't actually drop, except from pack purchases... so street sweeping for ATOs isn't really a thing and whatever can be done with Candy Canes (I'm blanking on if those can be converted to Winter pieces beyond the Travel set). If there are means to get ATO and Winters besides merits, packs and second-hand AH, I'm ignorant of them. Obviously we have HO/Titan/D-Syncs and the like as drops for specialized content, so the concept is not completely alien to the game. The HC market (and merit vendors) are a pretty elegant solution, and even with targeted content for drops I don't think it would be easier to acquire stuff (for players) than current means of collecting Inf and Merits. It would be an alternative, sure.

...some dogs will yap at anything, all the time, for no reason, just to hear themselves.

I enjoy Controllers. My personal splits are more like 75%/25% (solo/team). If you don't have a concept to lean into, I'll share this personal feel: I'm not a fan of secondaries that lean too hard into buff/heals, unless the primary is one where I plan to take most of the powers ( or take many pool powers early)... because I can delay buffs/heals with very little effect on teams facing normal low-level content. Kinetics sort of fits this bill IMO. My first Controller was a /Kin, I've never really felt like getting back to it, but it was fun to play with (and not need a travel pool).

I kinda love Energy Blast.... and much of the appeal for me is the knockback. I will slot a KB->KD in Nova, because as much as I like seeing enemies go flying into walls, I'm not a fan of tracking down enemies scattered in every cardinal direction. There is nothing else quite like Ki Push followed up with something like Power Burst on the same target. I don't intend to write any more in this thread, as this topic is an old one that I've participated in.. but I agree with @srmalloy comment about learning how to use KB to avoid chaotic scatter is a valuable skill, and with the other comments that KB/KD are pretty good 'soft' controls.

What I'm reading is that players are actively supporting a mechanism being added to the game that could be leveraged to have missions and critters be able to also inactivate Incarnate powers... because if tokens exist from something like Null the Gull, there would presumably be a way for critters or missions to apply the token (temporarily) without player consent.

I never keep rez inspirations in the tray, so "no".

Brutes can have +9% HP if they 3x 2-slot Superior Brutes Fury... is this what you mean?

It's an Idea Police thing.

Someone is ready to kick some [Brass]

Similar to what @Maelwys is talking about, in my own alternate world I'd have the Fury mechanic generate an AoE debuff... that way teammates wouldn't have to be close to the Brutes to benefit. This alternate class would have to have a revisit of balance (for damage... because debuffs don't translate to damage, for aggro, for PToD) but it would be a melee class that does something different.

Of all the things we have on HC, this is probably the most upsetting to game balance (when compared to other ATs)... moreso than any Brute/Tanker debate. It makes Blasters fun, but I think it is pretty crazy that Blasters got both sustains and crashless nukes... not to mention a reworked Inherent that mitigates enemy control powers..

I've never put more than 1 slot in Enflame! If I did, I think I'd probably opt for a two-piece set bonus instead.

I like this: I think there is some sort of cognitive disconnect when thinking: (1) Eliminating/restricting other critical user feedback because critical feedback is bad for a suggestion, and (2) A development team is more likely to implement a suggestion that gets no critical user feedback (maybe because the Devs would take feedback in Beta? *1). Unless somebody believes that the devs are going to (eventually) implement 100% of all suggestions that only have an absence of (negative) critical feedback, asking to restrict feedback on publicly shared ideas would be an example of narcissistic behavior. (*1) We have had (on HC) a small number of cases where the HC team implemented something that generated a reaction of "Who asked for that?" and/or "How did that slip in?"... in other words: negative critical reactions. Some were rolled back, some were not. For the huge number of player-made suggestions, I'd prefer some discourse happen before anyone touches the code. EDIT: The first example of a rolled-back change that comes to mind was the "rolling alignment tips" that would pour in. The obvious "problem" being solved was "what if a player doesn't want the morality tips they have?"... which on its face could be an issue for some players. In practice, players can of course buy any (level-restricted) morality mission they want... and the rolling solution was simply flooding players with notifications and eliminating morality missions that they may have wanted to keep.

I've long thought the only way Inspirations "break the game" is when a high-level character exemplars down to PUG with low-level content. Obviously set bonuses from slotting helps, but I can run relatively poorly slotted high-level characters through something like a Synapse with relatively little issue. It's pretty easy for just about any AT to "take the alpha" after popping one (or more) Inspirations. The Inspirations are a HUGE help solo, especially when leveling up. There are a handful of bosses/EBs/AVs that come up in story arcs (some low level, like Mr. G) where at at-level character will probably need one (or more) inspirations to finish a fight. The Kheldians get a couple of level 30ish arcs where a Council transformation of the map's final boss can be a dream-wrecker,