Bionic_Flea

Are you a politician in real life? You keep answering questions I didn't ask. Oh well, I'm done. Sorry if I have derailed the feedback.

When does your "math" say it's good enough? You can't compare a powerset that has built in proc damage to a set that does not just by looking at numbers on a spreadsheet. Make a build and play with it. If you can't solo most content at +1/x8 by level 50, let us look at your build and your tactics because you may be missing something. If you can, doesn't that prove, "mathematically", that the set is good enough? If you or others get together and run all the blast sets for a certain AT against the same content (like the Trapdoor test, but could be anything consistent) and storm comes in dead last then the set has real problems. Ston, GalaxyBrain, and others have done it for other ATs. I haven't done that either, but if I or someone else did, I would not be surprised to find storm in the middle of the pack. And that's where I end up. Is it the most damaging? No. Is it the fastest? No. Is it the safest? Maybe. It could be better, but it's good enough.

Has anyone noticed that you can target all the patches, except for Liquid Nitro, into the air on flying targets? Why am I getting containment damage on a critter that has no prior mez on it? All my Arsenal attacks appear to do containment damage by themselves. Either it's applying the mez before looking for containment and then checking the box or CPH just gave them double damage. Or am I going crazy? Ignore the rantings of this insect. The dummy always gives containment damage.

Hot water! Coffee! Tea! So much synergy. 😄

I can understand wanting powers and powersets to be better. And by your admission they just made Storm blast better. But when is it good enough? When you can solo at level 50 most content at +0/x8? At +4/x8? Please don't tell me that it "needs" to have x seconds of recharge or y points of endurance or whatever other individual stat. Because if a player can solo at x8 with that recharge and endurance and whatever that seems to me to be a want and not a need.

Care to elaborate? Oh! Is it that critters are running away from caltrops because you have no immob, but are still killing everything just as fast as your fire with an awesome immob?

So this terrible, horrible Arsenal Control at 2:10, is about at the same place, against the same foes, without the pet as your super-awesome fire/FF with imps out. Did I miss something?

Ooooh . . . secret . . .

Have there been any changes to CoT and Council since the last run? It's hard to keep up with novel-length patch notes.

Confirmed. I've had him get stuck on several elevators and even the doors out of a portal corp building.

Posi 1 Shadow Simulcrums do NOT have controller Arsenal control powers. Or if they do, they don't use them. As an Arse/Dark troller, the only power he used was Darkest Night. Same with Dean MacArthur's Me, Myself, and my Other Selves. Except now he also used Petrifying Gaze, which is not a power in Darkness Affinity, but in Dark Miasma. And again for Leonard's Good Villains Never Die and the Army of Eight badge. Only used Petrifying Gaze and Darkest Night.

https://forums.homecomingservers.com/forum/32-bug-reports/ Or you can ask a GM to move it.

Whenever new powersets come out, clones are always troublesome. Which reminds me, I need to run Posi with my Arsenal on test server. But it should already have rad/psi tankers in its list of powersets. You should report that as a bug. And while it can be annoying, clones generally have access to the full powerset, even if you don't. Something about spaghetti code and AI cheating. I'm guessing you were running at x6 and that's why you got the multiples. I usually run Posi at standard level so +0/x1 if solo or by however many people are on the team. So I never noticed multiples like in your photo.

But Johnny Unitas, why can't you just say: and save all of those extra words?

But Jimmy, why did you have to use the word diegetic? First, you made me look it up, and second, because now I have to come up with a Diegetic Flea.

I can understand players' desire to have the Devs state their design goals with the playerbase at the outset. I have certainly asked for that on prior occasions. But I can also understand the Devs' desire not to reveal their thoughts prior to testing, as many players (yes, sometimes even me), begin debating whether their design goals are worthy, rational, or superior to what the players have come up with. And they do this without ever even logging in to the test server and trying the new thing out. So how can we accomplish both goals? Give players some idea of what the devs are trying to do and at the same time have players actually test before arguing the merits of a thing they have not tried.

My one remaining request for this set is to add some -fly to Sleep or Flash Bang Grenades. With all of these patches, that cannot be targeted in the air to flying targets, not having a way to get flying enemies on to the ground and into the patches seems to be a glaring and frustrating hole. I'm thinking about Rularuu Watchers, Flying Cabal, Sky Raiders in TV as just a few problematic groups. Corrected to just Flash Bang, because Sleep is a location patch too.

But Jimmy, why should I tell you anything if you don't listen and obey?

So Tired And Raggedy Today Shrimp Tarts and Rhinoceros Toast Scared To Amplify Righteous Tactics Simply Terrified Again (of) Red Tuna

Oooooh!