Luminara Posted April 11 Posted April 11 No. 1 1 Get busy living... or get busy dying. That's goddamn right.
macskull Posted April 11 Posted April 11 Gauntlet, technically. Other than that, no. 2 "If you can read this, I've failed as a developer." -- Caretaker Proc information and chance calculator spreadsheet (last updated 15APR24) Player numbers graph (updated every 15 minutes) Graph readme @macskull/@Not Mac | Twitch | Youtube
Random Axis Posted April 11 Posted April 11 No AOE can have it's radius increased. You can only improve the distance you can toss/throw/shoot it. 1
Snarky Posted April 11 Posted April 11 (edited) If you eat a lot then you will be much larger., and have a much bigger bu…. oh, nvm. Yeah, buffs? Cannot increase those Edited April 11 by Snarky 3
Jack Power Posted April 11 Posted April 11 Could there be something to gain from radiuses (radii?) to respond to range enhancements? //Jack "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others.” ― Groucho Marx
Snarky Posted April 11 Posted April 11 23 minutes ago, Jack Power said: Could there be something to gain from radiuses (radii?) to respond to range enhancements? //Jack Whatever you are asking ( sounds like can radius increase?) nooooo the only AoE size that can be increased is cones. By increasing the range, through enhancer +range, set bunuses +range (ex bombardment ) and/or Aloha incarnate abilities +range (ex intuition). This will not increase the target cap, but will give a longer cone. See my AR Blaster and Dark Corruptor builds where I hit some serious +numbers that change the way you run the things. But the builds are very aggressive and if you rely on capped defenses you are going to be in for a rude awakening. These are hit and run builds. 1
EniEni Posted April 11 Posted April 11 Does that work for melee cones? My tanker has some cone attacks that could use some extra range >_>
Snarky Posted April 11 Posted April 11 (edited) 44 minutes ago, EniEni said: Does that work for melee cones? My tanker has some cone attacks that could use some extra range >_> Noooooo it works for ranged cones because the AoE of the cone (which is a degree cone with a “set” footprint) that takes basic +range enhancers and can therefore be increased. It is “enhanceable”. a melee aoe cone does not take +range enhacers and is therefore unenhanceable. a ball (fireball etc) is a specific area aoe that takes +range enhancer but that just enhances how far you can toss your balls. But you cannot makes your balls bigger than what the devs stuck you with. Edited April 11 by Snarky 1
Luminara Posted April 11 Posted April 11 3 hours ago, Jack Power said: Could there be something to gain from radiuses (radii?) to respond to range enhancements? Yes, provided that something is lost. There's no way in hell we'd be permitted to change a 10' radius AoE to 16' radius without paying for it in some way, at least in regard to offensive powers. The radius of every offensive power is an important factor in its balance. It's a lot easier to squeeze 10 targets into a 32' diameter sphere than into a 20' sphere, and that's one of the ways offensive AoEs are kept from becoming balance concerns. Get busy living... or get busy dying. That's goddamn right.
Luminara Posted April 11 Posted April 11 2 hours ago, EniEni said: Does that work for melee cones? My tanker has some cone attacks that could use some extra range >_> Melee attacks ignore Range alterations. That includes melee-range AoEs (like Spinning Strike), PBAoEs and cones. As @macskull noted, Gauntlet increases the radius of tanker attacks (wider cones and AoEs), but it doesn't increase Range. The game wouldn't be balanced at all if melee archetypes could Immob enemies and punch them to death without ever venturing into melee range to use their melee attacks. Get busy living... or get busy dying. That's goddamn right.
Lazarus Posted April 11 Posted April 11 4 hours ago, Snarky said: the only AoE size that can be increased is cones. By increasing the range, through enhancer +range, set bunuses +range (ex bombardment ) and/or Aloha incarnate abilities +range (ex intuition). This will not increase the target cap, but will give a longer cone. See my AR Blaster and Dark Corruptor builds where I hit some serious +numbers that change the way you run the things. But the builds are very aggressive and if you rely on capped defenses you are going to be in for a rude awakening. These are hit and run builds. Does this decrease proc. chance? I've got a couple sentinels with some hefty +range.
Andreah Posted April 11 Posted April 11 I could imagine some amazingly powerful new incarnate slot that increases AoE radii. Maybe just on one side of the tree. Maybe the other side increases the target cap. Maybe this new slot would be paired with another new slot that increases aggro caps. Maybe one side of that one decreases aggro caps. :D
Scarlet Shocker Posted April 11 Posted April 11 And all this time I'd been thinking Radii were the offspring of Radio and would inherit his hatred of Television There's a fine line between a numerator and a denominator but only a fraction of people understand that.
Luminara Posted April 11 Posted April 11 26 minutes ago, Lazarus said: Does this decrease proc. chance? No. 1 Get busy living... or get busy dying. That's goddamn right.
ZemX Posted April 11 Posted April 11 4 hours ago, EniEni said: Does that work for melee cones? My tanker has some cone attacks that could use some extra range >_> Usually not, but you have to look at the specific cone attack. Some few cone attacks in melee attack sets ARE actually classified as Ranged AoE and accept range enhancement and ranged AoE sets instead of melee AoE. Frost in Ice Melee is one example. Shockwave in Claws is another. Frost is actually pretty silly on a Tanker. It can be enhanced to 15ft range and because of Gauntlet, has a 135 degree arc and hits up to 16 targets. 1 1
Jack Power Posted April 11 Posted April 11 4 hours ago, Luminara said: Yes, provided that something is lost. There's no way in hell we'd be permitted to change a 10' radius AoE to 16' radius without paying for it in some way, at least in regard to offensive powers. The radius of every offensive power is an important factor in its balance. It's a lot easier to squeeze 10 targets into a 32' diameter sphere than into a 20' sphere, and that's one of the ways offensive AoEs are kept from becoming balance concerns. Well, I'd take that for granted. Was kinda thinking that a wider AoE would be lowed in damage and maybe tohit, higher end cost, stiffer recharge. //Jack "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others.” ― Groucho Marx
wjrasmussen Posted April 11 Posted April 11 8 hours ago, Jack Power said: Could there be something to gain from radiuses (radii?) to respond to range enhancements? //Jack No I went to Ouroboros all i got was this lousy secret! COH bomp bomp:
wjrasmussen Posted April 11 Posted April 11 15 minutes ago, Jack Power said: Well, I'd take that for granted. Was kinda thinking that a wider AoE would be lowed in damage and maybe tohit, higher end cost, stiffer recharge. //Jack why would you think all that? I went to Ouroboros all i got was this lousy secret! COH bomp bomp:
macskull Posted April 11 Posted April 11 8 hours ago, Luminara said: Yes, provided that something is lost. There's no way in hell we'd be permitted to change a 10' radius AoE to 16' radius without paying for it in some way, at least in regard to offensive powers. The radius of every offensive power is an important factor in its balance. I mean... gestures broadly at Tankers "If you can read this, I've failed as a developer." -- Caretaker Proc information and chance calculator spreadsheet (last updated 15APR24) Player numbers graph (updated every 15 minutes) Graph readme @macskull/@Not Mac | Twitch | Youtube
ZemX Posted April 11 Posted April 11 38 minutes ago, macskull said: I mean... gestures broadly at Tankers On the one hand, I am sure you won't have trouble finding people who think that particular buff *was* OP. On the other hand, though, I think @Luminara was speaking of allowing just anybody the same buff. As a Tanker fan, that'd piss me off more than a little. We can give everyone radius/arc/cap buffs for AoE when my Tanker gets Brute Fury and Stalker Crits. Who's on board? 😈 To put it another way, the cost of gaining that buff is playing a Tanker, just as the cost of gaining Fury is playing a Brute, etc. etc.
Pekiti Posted April 11 Author Posted April 11 (edited) OK, so the follow up question then becomes "Is the radius of an AOE toggle (Leadership/Maneuvers as an example) calculated as a true sphere, or is it a cylinder?" Example: I am standing at ground level, in the middle of my group, buffing everyone out to (radius) ft away from me. I then activate hover and float straight up 10 ft to get out of monster melee range. Does my circle of effect at ground level get smaller? Or does it stay the same (footprint) until I reach (radius) ft of altitude and now it disappears at ground level entirely? Edited April 11 by Pekiti clarify toggle aoe
Luminara Posted April 11 Posted April 11 47 minutes ago, ZemX said: On the one hand, I am sure you won't have trouble finding people who think that particular buff *was* OP. On the other hand, though, I think @Luminara was speaking of allowing just anybody the same buff. Both. The radius increase added to Gauntlet has been controversial, to phrase it gently, and the HC team is very unlikely to do something like that again because of the balance problem it created. Get busy living... or get busy dying. That's goddamn right.
Luminara Posted April 11 Posted April 11 16 minutes ago, Pekiti said: OK, so the follow up question then becomes "Is the radius of an AOE toggle (Leadership/Maneuvers as an example) calculated as a true sphere, or is it a cylinder?" Example: I am standing at ground level, in the middle of my group, buffing everyone out to (radius) ft away from me. I then activate hover and float straight up 10 ft to get out of monster melee range. Does my circle of effect at ground level get smaller? Or does it stay the same (footprint) until I reach (radius) ft of altitude and now it disappears at ground level entirely? Sphere. 1 1 Get busy living... or get busy dying. That's goddamn right.
Jack Power Posted April 12 Posted April 12 17 hours ago, wjrasmussen said: why would you think all that? Why not? To be honest I may have forgotten an 'or' in the paragraph. Thank you for the commentary anyways. //Jack "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others.” ― Groucho Marx
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now