Rudra

Agreed. Being able to Ouro' things at +5 levels of powers and still have all slotted enhancements available regardless of when the enhancement slot was applied to the character makes for a very easy mission/arc. Especially when on a team of players with those advantages. Being able to summon epic pool pets or use epic pool powers for a level 1-9 mission/arc? You think people are racing to objectives now? Wait until they can use all their powers through level 50 at level 9. And heaven forbid Incarnate powers at that level.

Live and learn. (Die and forget.) I sit corrected. Either way, with how additional damage types will be asked for incorporation, let's not wake this monster please.

Holy hells.... *copies and pastes elsewhere for future reference*

I was going to sit this one out, but with the growing comments, let's take a closer look. Water/ice attacks attack one of the three parts of a fire by cooling down the fuel and putting the fire out. Sand and dirt attacks one of the three parts of a fire by attempting to deprive the burning fuel of air; putting out the fire. (Problem, earth attacks are coded smashing, not earth.) A smashing attack like a foot stomp attacks one of the three parts of a fire by attempting to deprive the burning fuel of air or smashing the fuel. (Problem, it can only really affect the area under the foot. So you gotta be fast to stomp out any fire larger than your foot. And larger fires are beyond stomping out, they are quite capable of burning the one that tries instead.) A wind attack attacks the fire by attempting to scatter the fuel. (Problem. Scattering burning fuel tends to expand the fire unless the dispersal area itself is not subject to burning. Counter argument, Superman consistently blows out fires and Hulk has put out fires with a hand clap. Comic/anime logic.) Electric attacks do not affect wood/paper fires once the fire is started, but can cause one with a sufficient (super power) level effect and can cause electrical fires to flare up even larger. Oil and gas fires? Engine combustion comes to mind.... Dark attacks can be argued to attack the heat needed for the fire, but can also be argued as having no effect. Energy attacks (unless concussive/kinetic) would start wood/paper fires, by applying the required heat. Lethal attacks have no effect on a fire. Poison attacks have no effect on a fire unless defined as a liquid of sufficient volume to act as water. (Problem, poison can also be flammable.) Radiation attacks would have no effect on a fire. Psionic attacks would have no effect on a fire except by manipulating the fuel directly or the surrounding available extinguishers. Uhm... let's not open this mess, please. All the inter-play that would be asked for (Wind was already brought up in this thread) would make this a nightmare for our poor devs.

Blue side possibilities: Carnie fashionistas are causing Serge problems like @MTeague said. Serge finds the Facemaker's methods deplorable and sends the player to stop the Vazhilok from harvesting human parts as cosmetics. Angry Freakshow pushing for more people to use cybernetics as @Greycat said. Angry Circle causing problems because their wardrobe has been proliferated (after original look removed in don't remember what issue). Malta trying to use Icon/the Facemaker as a means to subvert heroes/villains or weaken them. (Chemicals being impregnated into the hero/villain costumes anyone?) Red side possibilities: Carnies as per blue side. Longbow trying to shut down the Facemaker for harvesting human parts as cosmetics. Freakshow quarrel with the Vazhilok causing supply issues. Can't forget those Circle mages. Malta redux. Just to throw out a few ideas. (Edit: Also, shouldn't it be cyberware rather than cyberwear? It is implanted cybernetic hardware. You're not wearing cybernetics. Anything worn would more accurately be technowear since it probably lacks any cybernetic interfaces.)

In the mission intro from Hardcase to go after Pandora, he says "You know about the Carnival of Shadows? They're some crazy super-powered chicks who think they're high class party girls. They'll do anything if they it'll amuse them, no matter who dies because of it. The word on the street is a Carnie named Pandora who made a deal with some Wailers. She sneaks in a box full of them into the Giza and lets them out, then all hell breaks loose in there! The Carnival gets to cause all manner of chaos while the demons run wild!" There are a few problems with this. Firstly, the "If they it'll amuse them" should probably be "if they think it'll amuse them". Secondly, The "The word on the street is a Carnie named Pandora who made a deal with some Wailers" should probably be "The word on the street is there is a Carnie named Pandora who made a deal with some Wailers." or "The word on the street is about a Carnie named Pandora who made a deal with some Wailers." Thirdly, you have 1 too many ins in the "She sneaks in" statement. It reads she is sneaking in into the Giza, where it should just say "She sneaks a box full of them into the Giza and lets them out,". Fourthly, the the mission reads like this has already happened at least once. If the implication is meant to be that Pandora has a known MO of doing this, then this is fine. If the player is meant to understand that this is the expected plan rather than what has already occurred, then it should read as such. Something like "She is planning to sneak a box full of them into the Giza and let them out, then all hell breaks loose in there!"

@Khrystina, I have to say the ones speaking against this idea make more sense to me. I get what you want to do, that you want your friends to know you are available so they should feel free to contact you. My question is though, what will a friends list "Open to approach" flag accomplish that you telling them that won't? And as you said, you already told them that. I'm sorry, but it sounds like your friends are terminally shy and no flag in the world is going to change that. I'm willing to bet that even if the flag existed, they would still be wondering if you simply forgot to change it and still not contact you. This comment is not to say I am against implementation. Implementing this idea would hurt no one or cause anyone any problems, except for possibly the dev that would have to make the flag and implement it. I'm just saying that if you already told your friends to contact you whenever they want and they don't for fear of bothering you, then not even a flag is likely to fix that.

It feels like when any mods are made, red side ATs are nerfed and blue side ATs are buffed. Tankers got their max resists faster than brutes, but brutes out damaged them. Tankers cried foul, so now Tankers still have better start resists, but their damage output is better. I was talking to a tanker player about how tankers had the better taunt ability, they auto-taunt up to 10, compared to brutes, and the response was "Good. I want the brutes off my porch. They shouldn't even exist."

You can also look at it through logic. To take evasive maneuvers is to focus on evasion, not attacking. So from this stand point, I agree that Evasive maneuvers should not retain any defense bonuses if you attack or interact with an object. (The ability also pretty well explains this itself, so there is that too.)

Okay, I found 1 set that actually has 4. Demon Summoning. Summoned pets use a mix of fire, cold, and negative. The MM's personal attacks use fire and toxic. I missed the toxic. Apologies. Edit: Though like I said, the negative splits its damage with fire. So does the toxic. It is 4 damage types though.

Guess you missed the part in my post asking where the 4 is from. Edit: "Don't know where you get 4 from." Please, by all means. Enlighten me. Give me the example.

Point. ... Okay, so how about reduce the timer to 5 minutes, no changes to ambush spawn mechanism, but add the after ritual fight? Maybe even bring Broadkin back as the after ritual opponent, but as a tougher enemy or with actual support?

No, you don't read the posts? No, you won't read the posts? If you are /jranger'ing my request you actually read what people are posting, what exactly are you /jranger'ing? ... You know what? I don't have the /Willpower to deal with you. So not going to bother with you.

Uhm... no... a badge for every 50 levels that you go undefeated? Even without farming, I'd be against it. Those who don't farm and are on squishies have a very low chance of getting these badges. Scrappers, stalkers, tankers, and brutes wouldn't really have much trouble, but there is always a random chance something takes you down no matter how careful the player may be. And also yes, because farming. (So I definitely agree with the nevermind bit. Sorry, you declared it a dead horse, but I still felt a need to respond.)

I've never had a problem with being interrupted while placing Trip Mine. Devices' Trip Mine is a T7 power. Traps is a T8. They do the same damage, have the same END cost, have the same accuracy, have the same radius, and have the same duration. I would hope the T8 was better than the T7 in some way. In this case, 10s faster recharge. Though the T8 does have almost double the cast time and has an interrupt time that the T7 lacks... which is weird....

Cool idea! Would be weird with Dual Pistols curving cone attack, but still... COOL!

How is this? Using Greycat's Option #1 reducing the timer to 5 minutes, except there is a new spawn of Red Caps every 15-30 seconds even if the previous spawn(s) are still alive (Edit: like they do in the Hollows mission with the constant waves of Igneous. Or was that a Who Will Die mission?), and at the end of the 5 minutes an Elite Boss Red Cap spawns not too far away with a minimum entourage of 1 lieutenant and 5 minions. Have the final showdown spawn scale up in size from that point based on team size (or difficulty settings) with the EB able to grow into an AV or GM for large enough teams (or high enough difficulty). Kind of like Snaptooth does, except he starts at his EB, AV, or GM state and stays there.

You have some interesting ideas. Yeah, the Red Cap final ritual mission is boring. Dumb question though: if you're fine with the stop 30 Fir Bolg mission where you just stand at the small henge and smash the individual groups when they approach, why are you not fine with the Red Cap version? Seriously asking here. Is it just because it is the final mission in the Croatoa line? I agree it is fairly anti-climatic, but it is thematic given what has been going on in the preceding arcs. That said, I'd honestly have to play through your suggestions to decide how I feel about them. Sorry for the lack of useful response. (And honestly, I would have liked a major battle against a unique Red Cap like Snaptooth either after the 15-minute counter ritual was done or in a follow-up mission. Just probably not against him specifically since he is intended for the Valentine and Christmas events.)

Obi-Wan didn't make them not see the droids. He made them think they were not the droids they were looking for and that they did not need to check the droids. Like you said, he confused and distracted them.

Do you not read what posts say and just post responses to them? (Edit: Also, incarnates are not a reasonable argument in my book. The set was designed long before incarnates were added. Incarnates are effectively post game content to me. Adding things to builds were never considered as responses to the sets. Inspirations? Yeah, that is an argument, it was a consideration when the set was made. Teammates? Also a good argument, except my counter is I solo. Still a good argument though. Incarnates? Post main story content where your character becomes a god? No.) As I said: This is not a claim the set is broken. It is a claim the set's designed hole makes no sense. As I mentioned to MTeague and Glacier Peak. It's great you think WP is reasonably fine. I do too. Makes no real sense, but is fine. Please read the posts in a thread if you are going to respond. Appreciated.

That's fair. (Though I was thinking perception, energy, and negative energy with a large reduction in regen, smash, and lethal; but apparently I can't seem to get anyone to understand that. Or they don't care. One or the other. Oh well.) Figured I'd be running into opposition on this. ... Actually, I figured a lot more opposition.... I thought there would at least be some people that agreed though. Nothing ventured, nothing gained though. I pitched the idea, and the only (two) respondents are against it.

(Also, please note in my OP, I never asked for END drain and REC drain resists to be put in without something to offset it. So I am not asking for willpower's primary hole to just be plugged without losing something. I'm asking for a hole that makes sense. Your comment, Glacier Peak, feels like you think I am asking for the set to not have any holes.)

No, I'm saying out of all the ways the devs could have balanced the set, like leaving some of the damage resists open (such as both energy and negative energy), they chose to make a hole that completely goes against the set. (And I almost always play solo. So no to the teammates bit.) Look, I know how to play the build. I know if I'm up against a group like Malta, I need to find the -END targets like Sappers and make them follow the dodo into history, effective yesterday or sooner. I don't have a problem doing that. This is not a claim saying the set is kerfuggered. This is basically me asking "Hey, devs, what the hell were you thinking when you made this set?!". Willpower resists Perception debuffs. Why? That has nothing to do with having a strong will and continuing on. (Pop some yellows to compensate for your visual weakness.) The set has a base 22.5% resist to smash/lethal compared to 20.63% psionic and 5.63% everything else. Why is smash/lethal so high instead of 5.63% like the other non-psionic resists? It has a base 300% regen. Why? It should have a 100% regeneration base. Regeneration rate is not a factor of willpower. Because those are so high though, willpower lacks its fundamental resists. (Hells, Dark Armor has 22.5% base smash, lethal, fire, and cold, with 37.5% psionic, 15% toxic and energy, and 30% negative energy, and it still has 69.2% endurance and recovery drain resist. That blows Willpower right out of the water. And for a +200% regen that doesn't even make sense for the set? No matter how strong your will, you can't heal back any faster. That is a function of your metabolism, not your mind.) The ability to keep fighting until the fight is over one way or another is what willpower is about. You pick yourself up and you keep going. And when it is over, you wake up in the hospital or you're standing over your beaten foes. Not standing there glaring at your foe saying "I'm too tired to continue. Can we take a break?" My question is: Why? Why the huge gaping hole in something so intrinsic to the very idea of willpower? Edit: Strength of Will and Quick Recovery mean nothing to a mob that in one hit, zeroes your endurance and ability to fight, and for the rest of the power's duration, keeps setting your endurance to 0. Sorry, just saw your edit, Glacier.

Quick Recovery means nothing when a lone minion can completely shut that power down with a single attack. Don't get me wrong, I love Willpower. It is my preferred armor set. (Edit: Even if only because it is the only set besides Invul' that doesn't have a lot of effects. And I just don't enjoy playing an Invul' character.) The fact it has no resist to either END drain or REC drain just makes no sense to me.

This was brought up in Bio/WP DDR, but I think it needs to be specifically pointed out. Willpower is all about having the wherewithal to persevere and keep fighting until the bitter end, or victory, whichever occurs. However, Willpower has no resists against endurance drains and recovery drains, blowing a huge hole right through the middle of the whole idea of the set. I understand all armor sets should have holes in their defense, but how does not being able to act because a lone Sapper or a Carnie mask effect instantly nukes your endurance make sense for Willpower? If it needs a different hole for balance purposes or whatever, fine. Maybe take it from the set's perception debuff resist. Being able to perceive the target makes less sense as a factor of willpower than being able to press on despite being fatigued.