Jump to content

I have a new PC! Will Windows 11 work?


JnEricsonx

Recommended Posts

Just now, MTeague said:

I've declined all Win 11 upgrades for this exact reason. 

I do not know if it works or not.  I have not seen any posting with wailing and gnashing of teeth at it, so I *suspect* it works just fine.

But I haven't seen a compelling reason to take the update yet. There's always mañana.

It kind of came with the PC....so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, kiramon said:

IDK

But W11 is basically W10 i thought with a new skin 

 

Sort of, but there are some definite changes under the hood for sure.

OG Server: Pinnacle  <||>  Current Primary Server: Torchbearer  ||  Also found on the others if desired  <||> Generally Inactive


Installing CoX:  Windows  ||  MacOS  ||  MacOS for M1  <||>  Migrating Data from an Older Installation


Clubs: Mid's Hero Designer  ||  PC Builders  ||  HC Wiki  ||  Jerk Hackers


Old Forums  <||>  Titan Network  <||>  Heroica! (by @Shenanigunner)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, JnEricsonx said:

It's so nice having a PC that boots fully in barely 30 seconds.  And having a GFX card that runs at like 25 C!   So, will COH work fine with Windows 11 or am I about to be very unhappy?  

 

TBH, it should be fine aside from the normal GPU/Driver related issues some have in general.

OG Server: Pinnacle  <||>  Current Primary Server: Torchbearer  ||  Also found on the others if desired  <||> Generally Inactive


Installing CoX:  Windows  ||  MacOS  ||  MacOS for M1  <||>  Migrating Data from an Older Installation


Clubs: Mid's Hero Designer  ||  PC Builders  ||  HC Wiki  ||  Jerk Hackers


Old Forums  <||>  Titan Network  <||>  Heroica! (by @Shenanigunner)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JnEricsonx said:

It's so nice having a PC that boots fully in barely 30 seconds.  And having a GFX card that runs at like 25 C!   So, will COH work fine with Windows 11 or am I about to be very unhappy?  

 

Windows 11 is essentially 10 with a ridiculous default location for the start menu and some paint. Works fine.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're running a 12th-gen Intel processor, there are some optimizations in the thread schedule to eake out more performance by appropriately scheduling the "efficiency" and "performance" cores.

Note: If you're on an AMD Ryzen-based system, the new scheduler ain't great.

Seriously though, while I like new tech, with Microsoft OSes, prefer to wait AT LEAST two major quarterly patches BEFORE I'll even consider putting it on anything other than a VM.  If I'm not due for a major OS reload, I can wait quite a while.

There's, quite literally NOTHING in Win11 that's "must have" outside of the aforementioned 12th Gen + Scheduler stuff.

  • Thumbs Up 1

If you want to be godlike, pick anything.

If you want to be GOD, pick a TANK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Hyperstrike said:

There's, quite literally NOTHING in Win11 that's "must have" outside of the aforementioned 12th Gen + Scheduler stuff.

 

Virtualization alone makes it worth the upgrade.

 

And I'm hearing close to zero problems or downsides — at least far, far fewer than with any prior major update. People bitching about how the start menu has been rearranged seems to be the worst of it, and those of us who like to reposition the task bar got shafted.

 

In a world that runs on OSes, it's less and less wise to hang on to old tech for very long. Especially if you use your systems for something more than gaming and social media.

UPDATED: v4.15 Technical Guide (post 27p7)... 154 pages of comprehensive and validated info on on the nuts and bolts!
ALSO:  GABS Bindfile  ·  WindowScaler  ·  Teleport Guide  ·  and City of Zeroes  all at  www.Shenanigunner.com

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, JnEricsonx said:

Such as?  So I can potentially try remembering this in case something buggers up and I have a potential reason as to why?

 

Aside from people having issues with the APUs and what I hear about the scheduler (see above), I'm not sure specifically as my build was partially designed For CoX.

OG Server: Pinnacle  <||>  Current Primary Server: Torchbearer  ||  Also found on the others if desired  <||> Generally Inactive


Installing CoX:  Windows  ||  MacOS  ||  MacOS for M1  <||>  Migrating Data from an Older Installation


Clubs: Mid's Hero Designer  ||  PC Builders  ||  HC Wiki  ||  Jerk Hackers


Old Forums  <||>  Titan Network  <||>  Heroica! (by @Shenanigunner)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shenanigunner said:

 

Virtualization alone makes it worth the upgrade.

 

And I'm hearing close to zero problems or downsides — at least far, far fewer than with any prior major update. People bitching about how the start menu has been rearranged seems to be the worst of it, and those of us who like to reposition the task bar got shafted.

 

In a world that runs on OSes, it's less and less wise to hang on to old tech for very long. Especially if you use your systems for something more than gaming and social media.



Specifically, what about virtualization?

And the difference between purposed cores and general cores is not an "old/new" thing.
It's merely an architectural choice. 

If you want to be godlike, pick anything.

If you want to be GOD, pick a TANK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hyperstrike said:



Specifically, what about virtualization?

And the difference between purposed cores and general cores is not an "old/new" thing.
It's merely an architectural choice. 

 

IIRC, virtualization is baked into the OS so that you can do things like boot a VM even, but it's been ages since I've read on it.

OG Server: Pinnacle  <||>  Current Primary Server: Torchbearer  ||  Also found on the others if desired  <||> Generally Inactive


Installing CoX:  Windows  ||  MacOS  ||  MacOS for M1  <||>  Migrating Data from an Older Installation


Clubs: Mid's Hero Designer  ||  PC Builders  ||  HC Wiki  ||  Jerk Hackers


Old Forums  <||>  Titan Network  <||>  Heroica! (by @Shenanigunner)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WanderingAries said:

 

Aside from people having issues with the APUs and what I hear about the scheduler (see above), I'm not sure specifically as my build was partially designed For CoX.


On a generalized microprocessor, you shouldn't HAVE TO be "designed for".
Will you ALWAYS get optimal performance for any type of system workload?
Of course not.  You NEVER will.
But if your performance is still in "acceptable to good" range, why does it matter?
It's not like CoH benefits more from getting 200fps vs 140 fps.

If you want to be godlike, pick anything.

If you want to be GOD, pick a TANK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WanderingAries said:

 

IIRC, virtualization is baked into the OS so that you can do things like boot a VM even, but it's been ages since I've read on it.


Just going to say that while YES, it's nice.  It's only nice IF you are using virtualization.
If you're not, it's essentially an ultra-high refresh monitor for a blind user who needs a braille printer.

If you want to be godlike, pick anything.

If you want to be GOD, pick a TANK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...