battlewraith Posted Thursday at 08:24 PM Posted Thursday at 08:24 PM Some people can't grasp the difference between dislike of certain types of people and dislike of certain types of characterizations, particularly in fiction. Some people understand the difference, but will equate the two things in order to deflect criticism that they don't like. An easy way to see if somebody has an issue with a female character--put that character in charge of something. See who gets mad. Also, Alex I'll take therapist for $200. 1
ZacKing Posted Thursday at 08:57 PM Posted Thursday at 08:57 PM 31 minutes ago, battlewraith said: An easy way to see if somebody has an issue with a female character--put that character in charge of something. See who gets mad. On 4/29/2025 at 4:22 PM, Excraft said: There is absolutely nothing wrong with a female character being a leader or in a position of authority. No one has said otherwise. See the aforementioned Captain Janeway, Elizabeth Weir, Samantha Carter et al. All of them well loved, well written characters. 3
Glacier Peak Posted Friday at 12:58 AM Author Posted Friday at 12:58 AM 7 hours ago, TTRPGWhiz said: Feels like this convo has reached a nadir, no? There's such thing as direct messages as well. 10 of the 11 pages on my thread are three people talking to eachother exclusively. The movie isn't even out yet, I'm surprised how much there is to write about considering. I lead weekly Indom Badge Runs / A newer giant monster guide by Glacier Peak / A tour of Pocket D easter eggs! / Arena All-Star Accolade Guide! Best Post Ever....
battlewraith Posted Friday at 02:20 AM Posted Friday at 02:20 AM TLDR Version of this thread: 1. This movie will suck because of Pedro Pascal 2. This movie will suck because of time travel 3. RDJ as Doctor Doom?!?! 4. This movie will suck because of the fake trailer I just watched. Nothing can polish this turd! 5. Real trailer looks good. Oooops turd got polished. 6. Digression about Superman's disguise. 7. Griping about modern audiences. 8. Of course Reed is a dick and will talk down to his wife. 9. No, Sue can't be a bossgirl. She's a mom. Haven't you seen Aliens?!? The thread was rife with negativity from the get-go. I'm looking forward to it. That first trailer won me over. I think strong visual style is the key to success for this film. I also read articles about Sue and Johnny that make them sound like thoughtful interesting takes on the characters. Beyond that I don't want to know much more because I want to go in not knowing how things will play out. 1 1
Excraft Posted Friday at 03:32 AM Posted Friday at 03:32 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, battlewraith said: 1. This movie will suck because of Pedro Pascal 2. This movie will suck because of time travel 3. RDJ as Doctor Doom?!?! 4. This movie will suck because of the fake trailer I just watched. Nothing can polish this turd! 5. Real trailer looks good. Oooops turd got polished. 6. Digression about Superman's disguise. 7. Griping about modern audiences. 8. Of course Reed is a dick and will talk down to his wife. 9. No, Sue can't be a bossgirl. She's a mom. Haven't you seen Aliens?!? You left out - 10. The parts where you went on and on and on about how female characters written with any inkling of maternal instinct or being a mother as a motivation makes those characters cliche, shallow, weak gimmicks. 11. The parts where you went on and on and on about how changing a character from their source material is SUPER BAD BAD!! (see Ripley not being a mom in Alien, but made a mom in Aliens). Changing a female character to be a mom/have maternal instincts is SUPER TERRIBLE BAD BAD!!! and ruins the character by turning them into a gimmicky cliche and is pandering. 12. The parts where you went on and on and on about how changing a character from their source material who IS a mom and IS a motherly/maternal figure as part of her character (see Sue Storm) while still being well respected, very powerful and a valued team member is NOT SUPER BAD BAD!! because bizarre reasons. She should be made the leader and the boss lady because MEN BAD!!! WOMAN MOM GIMMICK!! Edited Friday at 03:45 AM by Excraft 2 1
battlewraith Posted Friday at 12:02 PM Posted Friday at 12:02 PM 7 hours ago, Excraft said: You left out - 10. The parts where you went on and on and on about how female characters written with any inkling of maternal instinct or being a mother as a motivation makes those characters cliche, shallow, weak gimmicks. 11. The parts where you went on and on and on about how changing a character from their source material is SUPER BAD BAD!! (see Ripley not being a mom in Alien, but made a mom in Aliens). Changing a female character to be a mom/have maternal instincts is SUPER TERRIBLE BAD BAD!!! and ruins the character by turning them into a gimmicky cliche and is pandering. 12. The parts where you went on and on and on about how changing a character from their source material who IS a mom and IS a motherly/maternal figure as part of her character (see Sue Storm) while still being well respected, very powerful and a valued team member is NOT SUPER BAD BAD!! because bizarre reasons. She should be made the leader and the boss lady because MEN BAD!!! WOMAN MOM GIMMICK!! Lol I went on and on and on because you and others kept quoting me. Don't cry about it. The movie will eventually come out, so we will have answers to a lot of the objections (whether Pasco will work as Reed, etc.) If Sue in the film is put in charge of everything, starts barking orders and making the others look stupid, you can proudly say I told you so. If it turns out to be a reasonable depiction of the character for 2025, I'll point to all the whinging you did over nothing. 1
Game Master GM_GooglyMoogly Posted Friday at 01:06 PM Game Master Posted Friday at 01:06 PM Let's circle back to this after the movie comes out . . . hopefully with less animosity and bickering . 2 1 1 1
Recommended Posts