Wavicle

Air Sup is melee for a reason. But heck they gave us cheap -regen, why not cheap -fly too?

Haven't played my EM scrapper in a while, but I don't recall this. Maybe I'll pull him out and take a look.

Would LOVE to be able to display Local Time persistently on my screen in game. LOVE LOVE.

For All Time. Always.

yes

Part of the problem is that there’s really no argument to be made that scrappers in general are all missing something, either offenses or defensive. It’s one of the best balanced ATs in the game. If you want a scrapper with a teleport power, they exist. If you want a scrapper with a ranged damage attack, they exist. And if you want a scrapper with a little bit of tanking ability, they exist as well.

I have given this exact suggestion and got shouted down by everyone and their mother.

The ATO takes you from 50-55% uptime to 60-65%. Not amazing, but not terrible.

Honestly, I’m not certain that I prefer the design where the ATOs are something so important that they vastly improve the character and add functionality that you just couldn’t have before. That creates too much have and have not; I don’t mean among players, I mean for yourself as you’re leveling up. If there’s something missing from an archetype I’d rather have it just added to the archetype as opposed to being something you have to buy.

Yes, they just have higher base damage and the big debuff now.

Comparing Sentinel AoE to Blaster AoE is silly. Blasters are an outlier AT as far as damage goes because it's basically all they get. Comparing Sentinel AoE to SCRAPPER AoE, correctly shows that Sentinels do somewhat better AoE than the average Scrapper. Clearly not as much single target damage in MOST cases. That's where Vulnerability comes in. Comparing Sentinel damage to Scrapper Electric Melee should show how the ATs are relative to one another.

Oh neat, I rarely do the tf so I didn’t realize that also did it.

You can also unlock Cimerora as a destination to go to from Ouroboros by getting every exploration badge in Cim.

I love that idea, but I think it’s probably a lot harder to do than just adding more rings.

I know but it’s a pain in the ass to constantly watch that, especially since the buffs are constantly moving around, and sometimes even disappear. The rings are more consistent and easier to keep your eye on.

I'd like to see a little change to the way the indicator rings around the icons in my power tray work for Savage Melee. Basically, I'd like a Green ring to appear when I have FOUR stacks of Blood Frenzy, in addition to the current Red ring at five stacks. This would let me know when to use my finishers in order to avoid getting Exhausted.

If you can't take people not liking your idea, don't tell it to people.

There's nothing "hypocritical" about it. What a bizarre misuse of the word. Energy Aura's Taunt aura is Entropic Aura, which increases your recharge PER ENEMY IN RANGE. ALL Scrappers with auras that boost per enemy in range also have Taunt. Those without don't. That is the rule, and they should stick to that rule. If you want a Scrapper with a Taunt aura there are options to do so. If you want a Scrapper WITHOUT a Taunt aura there are also options to do so and SR is one of those.

You are misusing THAT term too. You are not being trolled, which is to try to get a rise out of someone for no other reason. I GENUINELY want windows added to bases. I don't CARE which zones get represented, as long as there are at least a few options, like 3 or 4 to start. YOU are trolling US by putting up a poll for base options that doesn't include a write in! MY wants for the game are just as valid as yours!

It's like saying that it's "unfair" that no Whips set exists. My character concept is a Whip user, and isn't represented by what you can do with Demon MMs, so it's unfair to me. That's not how fairness works.

Why on earth would such a thing matter? Put it on whichever wall you like! All players would have the same access. Your assertion that it would be "unfair" to those players who didn't get "their" zones represented is just that, an assertion. I disagree with that assertion. It might be a bummer, but it would not be "unfair". You are misusing the term.

Don't be ridiculous. You're not OWED anything. They do the best they can.

I'm not trolling. I'm thinking of how it COULD actually work without insane dev time.

an easy solution: only one window per base

You are inventing this problem. I never said that you could have whatever window you wanted. One window per zone, that’s all I’m asking for. And not even every zone in the game. It’s up to the devs what floor they want to put it on and which zones would be made available.