Jump to content
The Character Copy service for Beta is currently unavailable ×

ScarySai

Members
  • Posts

    2028
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by ScarySai

  1. Cool idea, but unreasonable at this stage. I'd stick to minor changes.
  2. Storm/storm is probably going to be really funny on the 4* hero-1 fight.
  3. If the fabled aprocalypse of legend ever happens, Storm's AOE isn't really that bad. The main issue is just that the set doesn't have a really good, proccable AoE. It still holds up well with that in mind.
  4. This is technically not a problem. Jet stream only knocks things that are in storm cell by design, so when you remove the repel for whatever reason, there's nothing to convert to a knockdown. I wouldn't bet on it changing, either way. I bet the deadline is soon.
  5. Real and true. If they ditch that borderline memeworthy proposal they made last night and ship the set, it will be in a pretty good spot.
  6. Here's an idea that would actually help: Reduce the cast time of category five and storm cell. If you do that without adding some weird unnecessary nerf, because in your minds every buff has to warrant a nerf to counteract it for some reason, a lot of problems people have with setup will be dealt with.
  7. The most significant difference solo is things scatter more and low health strays may escape more often. It's not a crippling issue if you have to gun it before cell is ready.
  8. Ah well fear not, for the solution we came up with is to give you a ten second longer recharge for some reason!
  9. Ideally, they reconsider. But on the bright side, assault rifle will be in a much better spot, regardless of being saddled with a useless stun.
  10. That is their current plan, yes. It is also why I think it is a godawful change. So you don't solve the problem, and make it worse for people who invest in their character, this helps how, exactly?
  11. Please don't beanbag storm cell. This doesn't address the complaints of the people whining about it here, and makes the power relocation more of a struggle for anyone playing past level 10. How did this idea even leave the drawing board? It makes the set worse.
  12. Ar has more than enough aoe, now that flamethrower doesn't take three hours to land anymore, and the oft forgotten grenade typing change made that power more palatable. It's the single target that needs a bit of help, and incinerator being buffed a bit will likely address that, despite the giant step backward reverting aim is.
  13. Lacking any evidence due to not having the foresight to actually record it at the time during it's short-lived existence, that's really all I got for ya. I could get into detail regarding how you had to recast it much more, when right now you are able to blast much more without having your flow interrupted, but other than my word and the fact you know I'm a good player, you're not getting much better than that. Do I agree that a shorter recharge would be fine if there wasn't a catch to duration or damage? Sure, at least it would shut people up about it. But that catch is the important disqualifier here. I think it's a non-issue, personally, there's no reason not to slot it with recharge, you'll accidentally get enough if you slot a full posi to get it damn near perma before we even factor in global recharge.
  14. Fulcrum shift isn't a core part of kinetics? Heat loss and benumb aren't a core part of cold? News to me. Recharge isn't going down without a duration cut, which will put the set in a worse place and in effect accomplish nothing. You alone account for most of the replies in this thread, tone it down a bit.
  15. Benumb, fulcrum shift, heat loss, I can easily dig for counter-examples. Quit spamming the thread, please.
  16. Not even proccable like suppressive, to boot. Sorry, I don't see the value of the stupefy proc in a set that already has the capability to permaknock whatever it's hitting. AR, unlike DP - also has good attacks now, so the need for a mez power is already hard to justify. Why mez an LT or boss when I can obliterate it with snipe, slug, incinerate and burst in no particular order while passively locking it down with knockdown?
  17. Overly complicated solution to the problem of "Beanbag is bad and incompatible with AR." at the end of the day. Aim is a simple fix that accomplishes the same end goal. Being 'generic' isn't a bad thing in and of itself.
  18. I'm using posi and/or ice mistral without it's proc. If you slot the ice mistral proc, it can proc on summoning, which notifies and can lead to headaches before you're ready.
  19. This was tested, it wasn't good. Trust me.
  20. Intensify buffs your proc chances for lightning and wind by 20%. So cloudburst would be 90% for wind and 80% for lightning.
  21. I wouldn't count on it, sadly. Even though that'd be a great way to appease the two people who like beanbag.
  22. We're supposed to test things here?
  23. I dig adding the proc chances to the advanced tool tip. And I honestly don't see how people think cloudburst underperforms. Between that, hailstorm and DS, as well as the absurdly high chance to proc, it's pretty strong.
  24. Just slap a posi set in there and call it a day. Do I think Storm Cell could probably contribute more? Sure. Do I think they'll do that without nerfing something else, probably not, even though I think it'd be fine.
  25. It would be pretty trivial to add stun to another power, too. This should not be a roadblock.
×
×
  • Create New...