-
Posts
1317 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Patch Notes
Everything posted by Andreah
-
You can still convert spare Emps into cash; it's just not as lucrative as via reward merits. And this does kind of hit players who were running non-AE content and getting emps from Vet levels there to convert to reward merits to get IOs pretty hard, too.
-
This will be self-limiting to a degree. Imagine this goes live, and huge number of Emps from farming and ordinary content flood into the market as super-inspirations. Only so many of those will be bought, listers will undercut listing prices to try to get their to sell, and eventually many will stop and the price will settle where demand is enough to keep the supply from sellers who remained sold. I don't know where that price is relative to Inf/Emp, but I'm sure it's lower than before.
-
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Enemy Aggro Revamp
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
I was already herding a lot; people generally like it, if they're not getting murdered by it. I think it will take a little more care and judgment so that a herding tank/brute doesn't herd when herding is bad for the rest of the team. -
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Enemy Aggro Revamp
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
I often finding myself wishing the aggro cap were higher, but then I think about it a bit and decide that's not really a good idea. A full team of active, powerful, characters can still aggro huge numbers of mobs. But it takes coordination and skill. Now, the challenge for that team will be getting the right number of mobs aggro'd, and also into melee/AoE range, and attacking on the characters that can take it. I look forward to it. -
If anyone thinks that more than half the names aren't being held by fewer than half the accounts, that's patently absurd. Moreso, I expect and consider it almost without question that the vast majority of the names in the database are held by a small fraction of the total accounts, and worse, many of these accounts with many names are held by the same actual player. I'll cite the Pareto rule. And I would love to see the devs produce statistics of how many accounts hold how many names. I recall at HC launch a number of people mentioning they were systematically going through names they could think of to deliberately squat on them. Again, no sympathy. Log those characters in once a month or risk losing their names.
-
That doesn't solve name squatting, it just solves account abandonment. I could be in favor of more aggressive name release schedules, criteria, and features; such as: Level 50 names not being entirely safe, e.g., a faster schedule and only a one year grace for level 50's. Only level 50 character on the first page never becoming tagged for release Requiring the character to be played for a full cumulative hour to untag the release warning Only allow to untag by login a single name per day An automatically generated forums post each day by server of names which have been newly tagged for release Let's keep in mind how reasonable this is. The folks who're most upset by the new system have been sitting on vastly larger shares of the namespace than typical players, don't actually care enough about their character names enough to spend a single minute, or less than a minute per month on them, or frankly, don't hardly play the game anyway. Again, I'm having a hard time feeling sympathy for the level of entitlement I perceive.
-
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Architect Entertainment
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
Market prices of valuable IO's aren't really driven by the supply of recipes that farmers produce. For example, the price floor on LotG's is not greatly affected by the supply/price of base recipes. The dominant element is the price of the average of 39.43 or so converters it takes to make them from uncommon IOs. That's 2.76 million at the current price for 39.43 of them. Even if it were only 30, that would be 2.1 million. You could drive the cost of the original recipe down to zero and it barely moves the needle. And converters primarily come from merits. Most of the recipes farming produces are, like in most content, common ones. These can't be used in the conversion process, the need for them is pretty low in end-game builds. Most all of them vendor for more than they sell in the auction, and that's likely because farming drives their auction prices down. Which means they are not a supply in the economy at all -- they're getting immediately vendored, or listed, bought and then vendored as an inf source. Salvage that farmers get is likely more of an impact, but the most efficient, least expensive means to produce useful IO's occur at lower levels where there's not a lot of call for the expensive rare salvage; instead for yellow and white salvage, which even at their seeded prices barely budge the needle on the floor for expensive IOs. My conclusion would be that farming on the whole, even by the high intensity master farmers, doesn't really drive prices down much, if at all. What it does do is create a lot of inf, which if not siphoned off in some manner, would drive prices up. The losers if farming were actually removed (not just the hair cut we're likely to see from these changes) will probably be the near-Trillionaires who siphon that excess off, because there will be a little less of it. All of this is speculative, but I'm not too worried about the game economy. -
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Architect Entertainment
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
I really doubt this would do it alone. Pocket D would just become more unbearably crowded, and likely will anyway. Fortunately, there will be new alternative locations for RP'ers to go hang out. -
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Architect Entertainment
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
I think you're reading a lot more out of my post than I put into it. Farming contributes significantly to the economy, I think that's clear. I believe farmers also spend a greater fraction of their time on-line actively gaining XP/Inf/drops that non-farming characters. Possibly much greater. Farming impacts the economy in several ways, it's not just a one sided supply boost. We really could use new statistics, and imo, ideally new statistics by time spent in AE vs not in AE. That might not be possible to get. -
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Architect Entertainment
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
I think there is some truth to this. Farmers making new farming characters, or new farmer creating their first farming characters are a big part of the demand for IO, and especially the high end ones. Remember this post? And also this specific bit of data, from two years ago? I doubt it has become less unbalanced. Farmer characters do produce a lot of the goods in the economy, but they also consume a lot of them, and cause a lot of Inf to be generated which pushes prices up if it's not sunk out or absorbed into the trophy hordes of those Trillionaires. Also, I doubt we have a Trillionaire in-game just yet. But we certainly have quite a few people in the hundreds of billions. -
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Architect Entertainment
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
I kind of like this idea, but it would be an underwhelming substitute for farming vet levels and I expect it might be seen as insult on top of injury by some here. Maybe if you could bank up more than one level's worth of patrol experience, or if patrol experience could be as effective at vet levels as 2XP is before 50. -
Sudden Acceleration is a bit of a self-defeating set as it stands. But I could see it being five slotted a lot. Or, we could create a new Hami-O or D-Sync that did KB->KD conversion. And maybe had a little recharge or accuracy or something else no one would object to. Then delete the KB->KD from Sudden Accel and make it a five piece set.
-
Proposal for Regular Content Rewards Buff
Andreah replied to Andreah's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
In principle, I agree. I think PvP needs a lot more than just a rewards boost, but that's a whole 'nother discussion. -
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Architect Entertainment
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
The ones over the cap might attack you if they are in range, have a line of sight to you, and have a ranged attack power. They won't close in and attack you in melee range. Edit: here's the relevant snippet from the patch notes on this: If an AI-controlled enemy has no valid target due to them all being at the cap, it will choose the capped target with highest threat that is in range and use opportunistic ranged attacks. They will no longer mill about, oblivious to the action going on around them. Enemies that are beyond the cap *will not* pursue players that move out of range. -
This doesn't work so well as you might think. going up a couple of levels is not the same as picking a mob out thirty or forty levels above where it exists. Someone has to create new version of those mobs with level appropriate sets of powers and abilities and ensure they've been balanced against players at those same levels. Some enemy groups span the entire range of levels, but not all of them. It's a lot of work.
-
The OP means that you could go to say, King's Row and run the radios there at level 50? Or that you could go to King's Row, pick up a radio mission there, and exemp yourself down to it automatically? I think the former, but I am not sure. However, if so, the problem is that many of the enemy groups in those radios don't scale to 50 smoothly, or at all. They would need a lot of developer work to fill them out and balance them. I'm in favor of this, I suppose, but I don't know if it would make a good use of the time and effort. Finally, both Hero and Villain sides have a unlockable contact that will allow you to run any of the Bank Safeguard or Mayhems from all the zones. Maybe these contacts could also offer you the radio/paper missions from those zones similarly exemplared. Just a thought.
-
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Enemy Aggro Revamp
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
Also, in the current HC, the 17 mobs who will be returning fire after a Judgment are likely to be close to you, or will be shortly. Those are mobs whose incoming fire you can mitigate by defeating them quickly. Now, if 17 come in close, but 23 more stay at range, that complicates dealing with it. If all 23 are off in a single direction, or better, clumped together at a distance, then ranged cones and other AoEs will help; but if they're widely distributed around in all directions, that's harder. So there may be a greater premium on controlling crowd placement, with powers like Fold Space, Shadow Slip, and Wormhole. Also, using terrain and object masking to prevent ranged foes from having a clear shot will be more useful than in the past. -
issue 27 Focused Feedback: Enemy Aggro Revamp
Andreah replied to The Curator's topic in [Open Beta] Focused Feedback
The idea the random number generator in CoH is biased or unfair in some way was put to bed long ago. Enemy accuracy will come into play, and this may increase the chance to hit, but 5% is the floor. Lts and bosses get rank accuracy up to 1.3, and enemies at +3 to you (a 50+1 doing +4 content) another 0.3. If they're using accurate powers, I suppose it could double to 10%. It never forces enemies to miss you. It only forces hits if they've missed too many times in a row. And the lower their chance to hit is after all the calculations, the more hits in a row it allows -- in this case, up to 100 or so. At a minimum, no matter how good your defense is, if 40 mobs are shooting at you, most of the time you will get hit, and even in the best case for the player, those 40 mobs will score two hits per collective cycle of their powers. Whereas before the aggro change, only 17 at most would have been trying, with less than half as many hits per cycle. My conclusion is that using powers like Judgment in target dense areas is going to attract a lot of enemy fire, and the amount that lands even on defense capped characters will be substantially higher than we've seen in the past. Tester feedback here in this thread seems to confirm that as well. -
Proposal for Regular Content Rewards Buff
Andreah replied to Andreah's topic in Suggestions & Feedback
Whip Melee pool?! Circus Control set? Praetorian Epic Archtypes? Cimerora Barbarian Invasion Zone Event? Oh No!