Techwright Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I've been seeing a lot more of this of late, and its becoming a real annoyance. I'm playing one of my 50s, accept a PUG invite to a task force or trial, and once the full team is assembled, the team lead declares: "Okay, which 50 wants to lead the task force?" Bait and Switch. Sometimes there's another 50, often all eyes skim the list and find I'm the only one, and suddenly, I'm in an unwanted position. Personally, if I'd wanted to lead this task force, I'd have been the one recruiting. I've done it many, many times over the last 20 years. I've zero problems with initiating it myself...except, real life has changed and now there are certain medical conditions in my household that might require my unexpected, immediate safety intervention. I might have to step away for an extended time. Such an urgent response has less effect on the team when I'm a grunt standing outside an instance door than when I lead and the team depends on me for things like contact check-ins. I only point this out as just one behind-the-curtain example of why people don't lead teams. Reasons don't need to be spelled out. If they wanted to recruit and lead, they would have. When one joins a task force, it should be a sign that they are willing to work at the recruiter's level minus one. A TF recruiter in turn should either stick to leading or be up front in the recruitment phase with his intentions: "I'm recruiting but will be asking a higher rank to take over", or words to that effect. 1 1
Uun Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Techwright said: I'm recruiting but will be asking a higher rank to take over If I'm recruiting and not at max level for the TF, I'm prepared to run it at my level. That said, once the team is assembled, I'll ask if anyone over max level wants the star. This doesn't mean a 50 - I recruited for a Citadel recently and asked if anyone over 30 wanted the star (I was 28). This affects the difficulty level (Signature TFs always spawn at max level plus the leader's notoriety) and often makes more powers available. I don't view this as bait and switch, but a courtesy. 4 Uuniverse
DoctorDitko Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Honestly, I expected to hear about folks recruiting for a "Kill Most ITF" which changes into a speed run. I hate those! Communication solves most of these problems: LFG, we need a 50 to lead, then assorted levels are welcome. 1 1 Disclaimer: Not a medical doctor. Do not take medical advice from Doctor Ditko. Also, not a physicist. Do not take advice on consensus reality from Doctor Ditko. But games? He used to pay his bills with games. (He's recovering well, thanks for asking!)
Uncle Shags Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Uun said: I don't view this as bait and switch, but a courtesy. This is it. Recruitment is arguably the "hardest" part of leading a team. They've done that. Then, by asking if someone higher level wants to lead, they are offering to give others access to more of their powers. The person asking isn't trying to get out of anything, and burden someone else - they're trying to help. For example, I like to do the posi 1 tf as soon as I can. Level 8. So I advertise in lfg, get 7 and get ready to go. But, since the tf tops out at 15 (I think it's 15?) if I'm the one who starts it players will be exempted to my level and not have access to several of their powers. Sometimes those powers are really significant and people would love to have access to them. Depending on the tf and level it might be the difference between having fulcrum shift or not. Or losing access to your incarnates. So I do everyone a favor and offer to give up the lead for the greater good. If no one wants to, that's fine by me! If you don't want to lead you can always say you can't. There's no obligation. 4
Luminara Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 Get busy living... or get busy dying. That's goddamn right.
UltraAlt Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 3 hours ago, Techwright said: I've been seeing a lot more of this of late, and its becoming a real annoyance. I'm playing one of my 50s, accept a PUG invite to a task force or trial, and once the full team is assembled, the team lead declares: "Okay, which 50 wants to lead the task force?" Bait and Switch. Sometimes there's another 50, often all eyes skim the list and find I'm the only one, and suddenly, I'm in an unwanted position. Some people are stuck on the mentality that the 50 should lead every team that they are on. When ever this kind of comment comes up when I'm on a team, I'll generally say "You recruited, you should keep the star" or "X recruited, they should keep the star" 2 hours ago, Uncle Shags said: The person asking isn't trying to get out of anything, and burden someone else - they're trying to help. Or they could think that they will get more xp out of the lead being a higher level than themselves. Being on a task for with mixed level characters, the characters that are at the low end of the task force's level window are going to be at a disadvantage if the task force is set at max level (versus closer to their own level). 2 hours ago, Uncle Shags said: For example, I like to do the posi 1 tf as soon as I can. Level 8. So I advertise in lfg, get 7 and get ready to go. But, since the tf tops out at 15 (I think it's 15?) if I'm the one who starts it players will be exempted to my level and not have access to several of their powers. But, if you run it at base level, the CoTs don't have a good number of their powers that can really be a pain in the butt if you don't have any anti-mez powers yet (and, yeah, most squishies don't have any). The enemies powers change based on their level as well. 2 hours ago, Uncle Shags said: So I do everyone a favor and offer to give up the lead for the greater good. I do not believe giving up the star to the highest level character is for the greater good. That's your call. I've seen too many task forces meant for leveling turned into speed runs by someone giving up the star. The recruiter has no way to stop that behavior once they have given up the star. I, for one, never give up the star if I am the recruiter. 1 If someone posts a reply quoting me and I don't reply, they may be on ignore. (It seems I'm involved with so much at this point that I may not be able to easily retrieve access to all the notifications) Some players know that I have them on ignore and are likely to make posts knowing that is the case. But the fact that I have them on ignore won't stop some of them from bullying and harassing people, because some of them love to do it. There is a group that have banded together to target forum posters they don't like. They think that this behavior is acceptable. Ignore (in the forums) and /ignore (in-game) are tools to improve your gaming experience. Don't feel bad about using them.
SmokinIndo Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) The only responsibility that comes with having the star is being the guy who calls the contact after every mission. You're not commanding the US Army. You're not getting court-martialed if your team wipes. I don't know why some people are so afraid of "leading" task forces. I've had star many times without saying a single word in chat. Recruiting is the hardest part of any TF, and that's no longer your responsibility. It's not such a terrible burden being the 50 who leads so everyone gets scaled to the highest level. Nobody expects anything more from you. Edited 14 hours ago by SmokinIndo 2
UltraAlt Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 45 minutes ago, SmokinIndo said: Nobody expects anything more from you. I do. If someone posts a reply quoting me and I don't reply, they may be on ignore. (It seems I'm involved with so much at this point that I may not be able to easily retrieve access to all the notifications) Some players know that I have them on ignore and are likely to make posts knowing that is the case. But the fact that I have them on ignore won't stop some of them from bullying and harassing people, because some of them love to do it. There is a group that have banded together to target forum posters they don't like. They think that this behavior is acceptable. Ignore (in the forums) and /ignore (in-game) are tools to improve your gaming experience. Don't feel bad about using them.
JJDrakken Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) I had several in game buds tell me that and chaos that happens. I was like wait what? This is a real thing? ROFL, I swear we got some "special" folks here. I'm so use to always team leading what ever I'm doing. So I never see this, I very rarely join other groups, cept maybe random TF or the very very very ultra rare iTrial. Edited 13 hours ago by JJDrakken
High_Beam Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Bait and Switch? Absolutely. And when it happens I tend to punch out of that team. The only exceptions are when it is comprised of SG mates or its a league thing like an invasion or raid, Girls of Nukem High - Excelsior - Tempus Fabulous, Flattery, Jennifer Chilly, Betty Beatdown, Totally Cali, Two Gun Trixie Babes of War - Excelsior - High Beam (Yay), Di Di Guns, Runeslinger, Munitions Mistress, Tideway, Hard Melody, Blue Aria Many alts and lots of fun. Thank you Name Release For letting me get my OG main back!
tidge Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 5 hours ago, Techwright said: I've been seeing a lot more of this of late, and its becoming a real annoyance. I'm playing one of my 50s, accept a PUG invite to a task force or trial, and once the full team is assembled, the team lead declares: "Okay, which 50 wants to lead the task force?" Bait and Switch. Sometimes there's another 50, often all eyes skim the list and find I'm the only one, and suddenly, I'm in an unwanted position.
Crossie Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Accept leadership of the group then kick the person who organized it. Run the TF thereafter. Everybody loves a little drama. 2
biostem Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 7 hours ago, Techwright said: I've been seeing a lot more of this of late The one I seem to keep running up against is where someone starts a team on one of their 50s, then after a few missions, if there's other 50s present, they declare that they're going to switch to a non-50 alt, meaning that someone else will have to do the mission getting...
Scarlet Shocker Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago First world problems. I've never actually seen someone pass the star to an unwilling participant. I've seen a lot of team formers offer to pass star to higher levels who may or not accept it. The reason for this is simple: Many people are unwilling to form the team so there are folk forming the team than wanting to team. You don't have to lead, and if they poke you with a star, just tell them no and pass it back or quit and form your own team then the issue doesn't arise. I neither know, nor care, what the difference between ignorance and apathy is
Water Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago I've had the star shoved onto me without a single word countless times. In that case I have left the team. I don't mind leading but I'm a much better joiner.
Ironblade Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago I've had this happen and I have exactly zero problem with it. I'm not going to make any decisions but I have no problem with being the person calling the contact. Originally on Infinity. I have Ironblade on every shard. - My only AE arc: The Origin of Mark IV (ID 48002) Link to the story of Toggle Man, since I keep having to track down my original post.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now