golstat2003

This sounds pretty neat.

Kinda what I was trying to say earlier. I'm not seeing this rash of "idea police" that is rampantly destroying this section of the forums. Glad to see I was not the only one. /shrug.

And many folks disagree and say that it's not counter productive. /shurg

IMO IOs gave the game a layer of complexity and variety it was sorely lacking prior to them existing. We agree to disagree.

Okay cool we can agree to disagree that it’s a problem on the forums. You think it is. Some folks agree, some disagree. Moving on on that point.

No but if you can defend your suggestion, It may help a dev in the future who reads it to consider that it is an actual good idea, or think of a way to implement it while taking out the negative parts that folks who initially disagreed don’t like. Discussion both negative and positive has made things the devs implement better and better in Closed Beta for instance.

And I’d argue the mechanic is working just fine. So I disagree.

As to the bolded, the intelligent discussion going on now for 3 pages makes me strongly disagree with this opinion. And it sure as hell is an opinion not a fact. The multiple suggestions threads still being opened daily by new and old posters are like is also evidence that this is just your opinion, not a fact.

The bolded. So very much the bolded. As someone working in IT for the past 20 years, I can tell you that in that field you better be prepared to defend and explain why you idea is a good one. Maybe I’ve just gotten used to that type of feedback loop.

You have it because they want the feedback. Them wanting and having the player feedback has absolutely nothing to do with them having the resources (they don’t) to implement even 1 percent of 1 percent of what’s in the suggestions forums. Also some suggestions they read may give them an idea how to do something else, how to morph that idea into something THEY (the devs) may actually want to do. There is never anything wrong with getting feedback or leaving the door open to get that feedback. That in no way shape or form is an unspoken contract that that feedback will be acted on.

orrrrrr aka Welcome to the Internet. 😝

The thing is even if they did this there is no guarantee the suggestion would ever be implemented. I think that’s part of the problem many people can’t fathom. The team is not large enough to implement even 1% of 1 percent of all the suggestions that come in each week. But yeah sticky that ability if possible.

I think I saw a thread earlier this week where GMs said their DMs are open. Not sure if the Dev's dms are, but I assumed mod only suggestion would be a PM to a GM. EDIT: Yeah this thread:

Finding things wrong with it often has lead to others finding ways to improve a suggestion based on responding to what the person pointed out is wrong. I don't think there is anything wrong with that since there are other posters who can point out how to fix what the person said is wrong, with the original suggestion. Often time an alternative is then suggested. Keep in mind if a person thinks a suggestion will be detrimental to their playing this game, they have right to just outright say that. That's not dumb.

here's the thing: that person is ALLOWED to be an obstacle if that's how you see it. In reality they really are not, as the DEVS ONLY decide what suggestions they do or don't implement. They can choose to ignore the ENTIRE suggestion forum if they want. That's their right.

The bolded is the dev's job, not ours. All we can do is say why we like a suggestion or why we don't. Everyone who posts here is allowed to do that.

Yeah no. I'm fine with them NOT making the game even easier. As others have pointed out there are ways to deal with end drain.

I'm fine with a channel for it, where it stays. Had they allowed it everywhere then I would take more issue. EDIT: As for the OP, no thanks. I'd rather the game stay text than deal with the problems that AI voices could bring, including the wrath of SAG.

No. I'm fine with whatever the devs need to do to protect the servers. There are other servers to paly on and the chats are cross server. Not seeing an issue here.

The game is fun still to this day. And still to this day does a number of things more casually then other mmos out there. When I want technical battles that have me dancing and dodging I play FFXIV, Elden Ring, etc. When I want shear madness and fun chaos (and partially turning my brain off), COH is always there. 😄

Seeing as how some have said they feel the EXISTING incarnate powers need a nerf, I don't think anyone can justify even stronger incarnate powers. Adding more variants sure, but higher tiers, no.

Maybe a temporary time that the large Wolf pet comes in to attack and then vanishes?

The fact that a second above can open up means I’m going to have to disagree with this suggestion. The only way I’d agree is if we’re that the devs won’t make any changes to compensate for the jump from 50 to 75. Which knowing HC is highly unlikely. So a tentative /JRANGER get from me.

OMFG. Reading this made me feel some kind of way as I’ve just started re-reading Fables comics volume by volume. To give context to anyone in the know, I’m at part where Big Bad Wolf’s father comes into the picture and Snow talks to her last child. (No spoilers, if you know, you know lol)

Rage should go the way of <insert extinct animal here> and all of that power and to hit rolled into all the other powers, as many people have requested for years. Seriously Rage holds the set back from being buffed by the Devs who fear overpowering it. In the era of “modifying” overpowered things that HC currently is I think anyone expecting buffs for SS as it exists today, needs to pass whatever they are smoking around to the rest of us. LOL Mind you I agree and disagree with some of the recent modifications (some stuff changed was so obvious that it was going to be eventually changed that Stevie Wonder could have called it), I’m just keeping it real for anyone claiming that SS as it exists today would ever get buffs. It won’t. Not without numerous changes at the same time.