Jump to content
Hotmail and Outlook are blocking most of our emails at the moment. Please use an alternative provider when registering if possible until the issue is resolved.

ShardWarrior

Members
  • Posts

    2620
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by ShardWarrior

  1. Same here, but if that is how they want to spend their time, more power to them.
  2. I am familiar with MMO culture, thank you. The farm map itself exists in the game world and someone is playing it to clear the map, so the game is being played. They are clearing maps, collecting XP and drops just like any other story content mission. I can understand and appreciate some people do not care for this and prefer to run story content which is perfectly fine.
  3. Playing a farm is playing the game.
  4. This is what precisely what the LFG channel is for - looking for a group.
  5. My Le Petomane alt is anxiously awaiting a Wind Control set.
  6. To be fair, everyone is entitled to their opinion, no matter how ignorant or dumb those opinions may be. People seem to forget others have different goals in playing. I think it is great that you are looking for others with a similar concept build to team with. I wish you good luck and good fun!
  7. You are welcome. If you have not already, check out the Base Builders Cheat Sheet and Base Building Video Guide threads. Lots of great info in them! 😁
  8. Type this into the chat - /sg_passcode <your password here> Example: /sg_passcode HELLOWORLD Look in the chat window and you will see your passcode there with the number in it, like; /sg_passcode HELLOWORLD-12345 You will need to have base editing permissions in order to set or change the passcode.
  9. I am not sure if anyone is running that way. I have no idea code-wise how much work it would be to remove the incarnate slot requirement to queue for the various itrials. I think the lack of incarnate powers in running them would make support and CC/debuff much more valuable.
  10. And out of the blue accusing me of being condescending is contributing what exactly to the topic at hand? If I am being defensive, it is due to being accused of being condescending to others simply by offering an alternative temporary solution as part of the discussion. I have already said repeatedly I think more incarnate content is needed. I have also suggested that removing the incarnate slot requirement to queue for incarnate trials might offer another level of difficulty and challenge. Feel free to disagree if you like. Everyone is entitled to their opinion.
  11. Perhaps if you took the time to actually read, things would make sense.
  12. Well no, I am offering a potential solution that works in the interim until something can be developed. It is a suggestion on a suggestion forum.
  13. No, I am not saying that at all. You are assuming that. I am simply offering an idea. If they are using it already, great. If not, perhaps they will give it a try.
  14. How is this any different than advertising for either speed or non-speed TFs? All specific AT TFs? All specific AT mission teams? Badge runs? Offering the suggestion of using available tools to find like minded players is a legitimate suggestion to improve the quality of play for someone. Suggesting my response is condescending is condescending to me. As for suggesting other options and ideas, I have done that in this post and others on the topic.
  15. It was SIGNIFICANT shrinkage!
  16. Why not lift the requirement of incarnate slots being unlocked and/or slotted in order to queue for Incarnate trials?
  17. Both statements are exclusionary. I do not see why looking for others to run non incarnate power teams is somehow nefarious or negative.
  18. I did not know you could edit the costume file like that. I am totally making all of my Mini alts even smaller! 😁
  19. I completely agree. At least to me, if we had much more content available for incarnates, it would make removing their use from the normal 45-50 content much less painful.
  20. I am not sure I buy this. From what I am reading here in this thread and from others, there are quite a few people who would have no issue whatsoever unslotting incarnates to run a TF. Are they not the target audience? If people do not want to do that, then they do not have to and can find another team that suits their play style. I do not see advertising for no incarnate power teams being obtuse at all. It is no different than people forming all <insert AT here> TF runs. Seems to me there are people here who would jump at the chance to do it.
  21. I can only speak for myself here, but if people want to create their own exclusive groups to run all the content they like without using incarnate powers, more power to them. I would not feel excluded at all. There are people advertising for non-speed TFs all the time and people are joining them. Why is it somehow more difficult to advertise no incarnate power teams? Long term I would agree more incarnate specific content is needed. In the interim, people can form their own groups to run any content without incarnate powers with like minded players.
  22. I would prefer Regen get nerfed first.
  23. I wonder how difficult it would be to add a "swap ammo" type toggle to Energy Blast that lets the player decide if they want KB or KD?
  24. No doubt. However, there is nothing stopping anyone from forming "no incarnate powers" teams and running any content they like. The perceived problem already has a very simple solution. It just seems some folk do not want to be bothered to do a minimal amount of effort to organize these.
×
×
  • Create New...