Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Psyonico said:

is not an innocent question of “should changes be documented?”

 

I'll take this one.

The whole quote is: "That said, changes are still happening and it's kinda bullshit."

 

Power changes were still happening after open beta, after the publish; and yes I wrote that 'it's kinda bullshit'. Not innocent at all.

 

"Homecoming is not perfect but it is still better than the alternative.. at least so far" - Unknown  (Wise words Unknown!)

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Posted
1 minute ago, Troo said:

Power changes were still happening after open beta, after the publish

This is an online multiplayer game that is under active development.  Changes are always being made.

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 1

What this team needs is more Defenders

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Psyonico said:

This is an online multiplayer game that is under active development.  Changes are always being made.

 

Nope

 

Edited by Troo
Nope - as in you seem focused on arguing minutia and potentially still missing the bigger picture even after two devs have weighed in

"Homecoming is not perfect but it is still better than the alternative.. at least so far" - Unknown  (Wise words Unknown!)

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Posted
1 minute ago, Psyonico said:

@Forager

 


is not an innocent question of “should changes be documented?”

 

Whoopsie! You seem to have lost your place a little bit. I asked if you had any thoughts. You replied to me, but forgot to include your thoughts! I am asking the question. I am asking a question related to the topic. Should changes be included in the patch notes?

 

It's not a trick. No need to be cagey. It's the topic we are discussing. Discourse can be tough. If you don't have any thoughts, that's always ok. I can help you. Maybe you think changes should be included in the patch notes. Maybe you think some changes are ok to exclude... maybe you even have criteria you could share. Maybe you don't care at all or have not put any thought into it. All those positions are OK.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

There were other undocumented changes.  For example, AVs, GMs and monsters were made to be immune to Confuse.

 

 

image.png.981e13291d9c04b6dd21061f2152f279.png

  • Thanks 1

Play my AE Adventures, listed under @Jiro Ito, including award winners:

"The Headless Huntsman of Salamanca" #43870 **Scrapbot AE Contest Winner May 2022**           

"On the Claw-Tipped Wings of Betrayal" #43524 **November 2021 Dev's Choice**  

"The Defenders of Talos" #44578 **Mission Architect Competition Winner for October 2021: REBIRTH**  

Posted
45 minutes ago, Forager said:

 

Whoopsie! You seem to have lost your place a little bit. I asked if you had any thoughts. You replied to me, but forgot to include your thoughts! I am asking the question. I am asking a question related to the topic. Should changes be included in the patch notes?

 

It's not a trick. No need to be cagey. It's the topic we are discussing. Discourse can be tough. If you don't have any thoughts, that's always ok. I can help you. Maybe you think changes should be included in the patch notes. Maybe you think some changes are ok to exclude... maybe you even have criteria you could share. Maybe you don't care at all or have not put any thought into it. All those positions are OK.


you’re arguing just to argue.

 

Of course changes should be in the patch notes, but I also acknowledged several posts ago that mistakes happen and sometimes they get missed.  I already answered that, you just don’t like that I didn’t specifically say “changes should be in the patch notes”

 

 you’re being antagonistic and so is Troo.  This thread should have ended when a dev said “I’ll look into it” but instead that wasn’t good enough.

  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Thumbs Left 1

What this team needs is more Defenders

Posted
25 minutes ago, Psyonico said:

Of course changes should be in the patch notes

 

Yeah totally. Agreed.

 

25 minutes ago, Psyonico said:

 you’re being antagonistic

 

It's unfortunate that it seems that way to you.

Posted (edited)

The guy who got famous for calling ally buffs a consent issue wants to act like everyone else is ridiculous 🙄

Edited by arcane
  • Haha 6
Posted
1 hour ago, Jiro Ito said:

There were other undocumented changes.  For example, AVs, GMs and monsters were made to be immune to Confuse.

 

 

image.png.981e13291d9c04b6dd21061f2152f279.png

That sucks. an all Illusionist ITF was a blast. we confused rommy. It wasnt fast or anything like that. fun detected, fun removed.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Captain Fabulous said:


In a group of 8 Illusionists how many of them are really there anyway? 🤷‍♂️


So you’re saying they are ALL yelling “you can’t see me” . . . And no one can see them yelling this? 🤣

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

You guys seriously need to stop being such fanboys. Fanboys are just as detrimental as their polar opposite negative naysayer. Punching down on anyone who brings any sort of criticism to the game does nothing but stifle any future changes to the game, for better or for worse. There were undocumented changes, it was already confirmed a few times by a few different examples. The main point here shouldn't be "herp derp, why are you harping on one change that doesn't effect you". It should be "Well if that was an undocumented change, I wonder what else has changed that we are unaware of".

 

Here is another example of a undocumented change (as far as I know). Sirens Song in the sonic blast set has been made to increase damage to the highest DPA AOE in the set (minus the nuke). It also breaks the target cap, and allows you to hit 16 targets, even on a defender.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, DrBasics said:

You guys seriously need to stop being such fanboys. Fanboys are just as detrimental as their polar opposite negative naysayer. Punching down on anyone who brings any sort of criticism to the game does nothing but stifle any future changes to the game, for better or for worse. There were undocumented changes, it was already confirmed a few times by a few different examples. The main point here shouldn't be "herp derp, why are you harping on one change that doesn't effect you". It should be "Well if that was an undocumented change, I wonder what else has changed that we are unaware of".

 

Here is another example of a undocumented change (as far as I know). Sirens Song in the sonic blast set has been made to increase damage to the highest DPA AOE in the set (minus the nuke). It also breaks the target cap, and allows you to hit 16 targets, even on a defender.

 


Siren's Song was buffed 3 years ago.
 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
  • Microphone 3
Posted

I was afraid every time you entered Stealth, you were covered in Nerf bullshit. Not quite sure what Nerf bullshit is, but it sounds both gross and comfortable. 

Sky-Hawke: Rad/WP Brute

Alts galore. So...soooo many alts.

Originally Pinnacle Server, then Indomitable and now Excelsior

Posted
On 6/26/2025 at 5:28 PM, tidge said:

The only unexpected thing I noticed immediately after i28p2  was that something was seriously wrong with the Maintenance Drone from Robotics, but this appears to have been an introduced bug that has since been addressed. It was so bad, and so unexpected that it certainly felt like a 'nerf'. For a while there I thought it was an unannounced change to give that one user (who missed seeing his Protector Bots cast heals) what they wanted.

 

There's also still the issue that some Henchmen, despite sufficiently slotted with +%Endredux IO's, still manage to run out of Endurance.

And I don't mean on the overall scale during a longer fight - A single Henchman of the group just loses it much faster than the rest of them.

I noticed that more on Zombies and Ninjas, less so on Robots.  

Posted
15 hours ago, Captain Fabulous said:


Siren's Song was buffed 3 years ago.
 

 

You need to stop being a fanboy this is a serious detriment.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Ghost said:

Hard to empathize when the first reaction is a temper tantrum.

 

It is extremely difficult to empathize when it's conditional... maybe even impossible. 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Forager said:

 

It is extremely difficult to empathize when it's conditional... maybe even impossible. 

Natural progression….

 

“Momma, can you buy me this toy?”

“No”

*Throws self on floor and cries

 

I don’t like the tantrum, but at least he asked first.  When he didn’t get the desired response, childish behavior (because he’s a child) kicks in.

Makes sense.
 

OP went straight to throwing himself on the floor and crying.

 

This doesn’t make sense.

It almost as if OP is just growing tired of the game and is manufacturing a reason to quit, rather than just stepping away.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Ghost

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...