Troo Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Psyonico said: is not an innocent question of “should changes be documented?” I'll take this one. The whole quote is: "That said, changes are still happening and it's kinda bullshit." Power changes were still happening after open beta, after the publish; and yes I wrote that 'it's kinda bullshit'. Not innocent at all. "Homecoming is not perfect but it is still better than the alternative.. at least so far" - Unknown (Wise words Unknown!) Si vis pacem, para bellum
Psyonico Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Troo said: Power changes were still happening after open beta, after the publish This is an online multiplayer game that is under active development. Changes are always being made. 1 What this team needs is more Defenders
Troo Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 6 minutes ago, Psyonico said: This is an online multiplayer game that is under active development. Changes are always being made. Nope Edited 8 hours ago by Troo Nope - as in you seem focused on arguing minutia and potentially still missing the bigger picture even after two devs have weighed in "Homecoming is not perfect but it is still better than the alternative.. at least so far" - Unknown (Wise words Unknown!) Si vis pacem, para bellum
Forager Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Psyonico said: @Forager is not an innocent question of “should changes be documented?” Whoopsie! You seem to have lost your place a little bit. I asked if you had any thoughts. You replied to me, but forgot to include your thoughts! I am asking the question. I am asking a question related to the topic. Should changes be included in the patch notes? It's not a trick. No need to be cagey. It's the topic we are discussing. Discourse can be tough. If you don't have any thoughts, that's always ok. I can help you. Maybe you think changes should be included in the patch notes. Maybe you think some changes are ok to exclude... maybe you even have criteria you could share. Maybe you don't care at all or have not put any thought into it. All those positions are OK. 1
Jiro Ito Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago There were other undocumented changes. For example, AVs, GMs and monsters were made to be immune to Confuse. 1 Play my AE Adventures, listed under @Jiro Ito, including award winners: "The Headless Huntsman of Salamanca" #43870 **Scrapbot AE Contest Winner May 2022** "On the Claw-Tipped Wings of Betrayal" #43524 **November 2021 Dev's Choice** "The Defenders of Talos" #44578 **Mission Architect Competition Winner for October 2021: REBIRTH**
Psyonico Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Forager said: Whoopsie! You seem to have lost your place a little bit. I asked if you had any thoughts. You replied to me, but forgot to include your thoughts! I am asking the question. I am asking a question related to the topic. Should changes be included in the patch notes? It's not a trick. No need to be cagey. It's the topic we are discussing. Discourse can be tough. If you don't have any thoughts, that's always ok. I can help you. Maybe you think changes should be included in the patch notes. Maybe you think some changes are ok to exclude... maybe you even have criteria you could share. Maybe you don't care at all or have not put any thought into it. All those positions are OK. you’re arguing just to argue. Of course changes should be in the patch notes, but I also acknowledged several posts ago that mistakes happen and sometimes they get missed. I already answered that, you just don’t like that I didn’t specifically say “changes should be in the patch notes” you’re being antagonistic and so is Troo. This thread should have ended when a dev said “I’ll look into it” but instead that wasn’t good enough. 1 2 What this team needs is more Defenders
Forager Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 25 minutes ago, Psyonico said: Of course changes should be in the patch notes Yeah totally. Agreed. 25 minutes ago, Psyonico said: you’re being antagonistic It's unfortunate that it seems that way to you.
arcane Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) The guy who got famous for calling ally buffs a consent issue wants to act like everyone else is ridiculous 🙄 Edited 7 hours ago by arcane 3
ivanhedgehog Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Jiro Ito said: There were other undocumented changes. For example, AVs, GMs and monsters were made to be immune to Confuse. That sucks. an all Illusionist ITF was a blast. we confused rommy. It wasnt fast or anything like that. fun detected, fun removed.
Lines Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, Jiro Ito said: There were other undocumented changes. For example, AVs, GMs and monsters were made to be immune to Confuse. Check out the open beta patch notes, fix should be incoming: https://forums.homecomingservers.com/topic/58143-open-beta-patch-notes-for-june-21st-2025/ 1
Captain Fabulous Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, ivanhedgehog said: That sucks. an all Illusionist ITF was a blast. we confused rommy. It wasnt fast or anything like that. fun detected, fun removed. It's a bug that's already been fixed.
Snarky Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Captain Fabulous said: It's a bug that's already been fixed. No, you cannot start an ITF with 8 illusionists
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now