Jump to content

Yomo Kimyata

Members
  • Posts

    4510
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by Yomo Kimyata

  1. That's *almost* what I budgeted, but it's way way *way* under that.
  2. I call this one "April 2021".
  3. I am quite sure there are significantly fewer active accounts today, so yes!
  4. A few relevant facts: As of March 2020, there were 32,164 active accounts. A cubit is roughly 18 inches. Howard the Duck is one of the worst movies ever made. Keep it coming.
  5. Not responding to anyone in particular: You're playing it wrong. I'm not saying you suck as a player. I'm saying that playing regeneration as an armor is very different from most other armors. It's click happy. Don't play regen if you don't want to click. It's forward thinking (I need to hit Instant Healing before I take on these Arachnos). Don't play regen if you don't want to think ahead. Yes, you could add all kinds of bells and whistles to regeneration. But at the end of the day, I want extra kudos for soloing Hamidon on a regen brute. Thank you for your attention.
  6. I used to think the random thing was right as well, but I was disproved in this thread:
  7. Well, it's a real drag for defeat all missions, let me tell you!
  8. I want to amend my answer. As many as it takes. I am super impressed with everyone who is able to Mids out their build and stick with it. I can't. Most of my characters get played to 50, get a few incarnates, and get retired. There are a few exceptions. My "main" is a broadsword/invulnerability scrapper, which is not a terrible end-game build, but it's far from the best. I strive to do absolutely everything I can with him, and I *constantly* find myself trying to squeeze out a little more performance. Do I have enough accuracy? Do I have too much accuracy? When I run a TF solo (I'm on Faathim this week, and boy that's a great test!) are there powers I never use? Do I have enough oh shit powers? Do I have too many oh shit powers? And so on. And then I try a new incarnate power and it all starts again. I've probably respecced at least 5 or 6 times and I am already planning out my next one. Do NOT feel bad or inferior if you don't "get it right" the first time. "Right" changes when you are low level, or medium level, or high level. "Right" changes if you are zerging Council, or treading carefully with Rularuu, at +4/x8 or at -1/x1. "Right" changes when you are solo versus on teams. "Right" changes ALL THE FREAKING TIME! So I, for one, am INCREDIBLY glad that respecs are so cheap and easy to get!
  9. I'm getting all kinds of mobs stuck in the ceiling with KU powers from melee sets. This is definitely post patch.
  10. I'm not going to begrudge anyone their opinion, but mine is that regeneration doesn't require a rework. If you want a regen-like experience that may be easier for your playstyle, I'd suggest trying bio armor or willpower.
  11. This is indeed true, but my intention was to prevent giving people the incentive to load up a build with super expensive HOs. A top-notch build should cost well under 500mm, at least the way Papa TightWad buys it, but lvl 53 HOs throw everything off! I am *really* hoping that the eventual winner chooses the 1bn option, because sending 90+ emails each with an IO attached will be a total drag! Keep 'em coming folks!
  12. I think that HC needs a hug emoji.
  13. I do this with many of my Defenders -- solo build v. team build. In that case, it's whether or not I take the team buffs and if so how much I slot them.
  14. Your global handle is usually the name of the first character you made. You can check this on any character by choosing Menu > Chat Handle. To send yourself an email, address it to your global, with a @ at the beginning, make sure you have a title and you have to have some text in the message as well. You should be able to transfer up to 999,999,999 inf to your global mail box and can claim that from any character on that account.
  15. How about making a command /null that opens up the dialogue in any non-instanced place?
  16. Sometimes it's a great use of resources. I've given this example in my universally acclaimed thread Let's say you need an Eradication proc, but they are trading at ! 5mm ! There are five other members of the set, and they are each trading at 2mm. Converters are trading at 66,666. Starting with any non-proc, you have a 1 in 5 chance of getting what you want in one roll or 20%. You have a 4 in 5 chance of not getting what you want in the first roll, and a 1 in 5 chance of getting what you want in the second roll, or 36%. After 3 rolls: 49%; 5 rolls: 67%; 10 rolls: 89%. The average number it will take will be 5 rolls (this is a geometric distribution, so it has an (infinitely) long tail). If you are converting one, it may take one conversion, but it may take a billion. If you are converting ten, it will probably take around fifty conversions. Five rolls costs 15 converters which costs 1mm inf. My shortcut rule, taking into account the bid-offer spread, is that if one member of a 6-element set costs over 2mm less than I can easily sell another member, and I can do it in bulk, I will do that trade all day and night. In fact, I do.
  17. Thanks in particular to the knowledge that @UberGuy shared in the markets forum, it would be difficult to easily change the system away from equally weighted random system we've got now. I've done a few case study experiments on the RNG, and there is no reason for me to suspect that any vagaries in the RNG have been programmed in. So far, my personal record for converting in-set to a specific IO is 56 rolls, or 168 converters. I think my next closest is 42.
  18. I have not noticed any difference since the patch. What are you converting? It sounds like a combination of out of set and in set?
  19. A blaster. Everyone to the blaster forum and sign up for my contest!
  20. Great stuff so far, thanks! I’m at least passing familiar with all the primaries but the secondaries are unfamiliar and the epic/patron pools are brand new territory to me, so any advice given is welcomed!
  21. Well, obviously you would go Agility: Core Paragon for your alpha for that 22% that ignores ED.
  22. I assume that these are equal weighted, both in terms of selecting a new set and then within the set? And thanks again @UberGuy you're my patron saint!
×
×
  • Create New...