Jump to content

biostem

Members
  • Posts

    8165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    113

Everything posted by biostem

  1. Understood. What about the KVM switch in conjunction with the follow/autofire? Then you can easily switch without getting up, change things slightly, then switch back? I know on the ones I've used, you just tap scroll lock twice, then arrow up or down to change, and it's pretty much instantaneous... EDIT: I haven't used this personally, but what about a software solution like this?
  2. Those 2 quotes aren't contradictory in any way, nor do they falsely represent someone else's statement or position.
  3. I've done something similar via a KVM switch, but that involves alternating between one computer at a time, (so you can't control both simultaneously). You could pick up a USB splitter and a gender-changer to see what happens. Why not just have the second character follow the first, and put 1 attack or power on autofire?
  4. Oh look, another strawman. Who said "without the secondary"? My contention with you is that a blaster's secondary isn't a "ranged damage set". If you ignore all the melee/PBAoE powers in your secondary, then yes, you will deal reduced damage, (when compared to someone who does take full advantage of it).
  5. See my point about using your PRIMARY for that purpose. Get it through your head: A blaster's secondary set is not there for dealing ranged damage. You are chasing a wild goose, looking for a red herring, hunting a snipe...
  6. Point taken. Well, if it were just a toggle, I feel it wouldn't have the kind of gravitas that I'm looking for; Perhaps that could be the AT's inherent - a divine blessing of sorts, which adds the chosen deity's element as extra damage, plus a chance for an elemental strike/eruption with each attack...
  7. To which I replied that it is the PRIMARY that deals the ranged damage. If you are looking for ranged damage in the secondary, then you are looking in the wrong place. Also, saying "there's plenty of ranged damage" and "there's really nothing for people that want damage at ranged" are contradictory - which is it? Is there "plenty of ranged damage" or is there "really nothing for people that want to damage at range"?
  8. Then address my points: 1. You said blaster secondaries were "ranged damage". 2. Your criteria for #1 is that 2/9 powers on 1 particular secondary set have *some* kind of range. 1 and 2 do not gel, whether speaking statistically or functionally. You are wrong. Admit it and let's move on with the conversation.
  9. OP, I understand your frustration, but then I have to ask - what is the official policy, regarding what can or cannot be done in the help channel? If there isn't one, (besides the general rules of conduct), then all you can do is hide the channel or deal with it.
  10. Yeah, I think you've lost the plot several posts back; Your criteria for deeming a blasters' secondary set "ranged damage" is out of whack, and instead of owning up to your mischaracterization thereof, you falsely claim to know your opponent's intentions and throwing out passive-aggressive insults.
  11. I've played several sentinel builds, and the main problems I've run into is that the secondaries kind of reduce the need you feel to keep moving and/or "kite" enemies, but at the same time, the enemy AI tends to like to run right up to you and smack you in the face, and you often end up just firing off your ranged attacks at point blank range. In that kind of scenario, you might as well just play a melee AT who can do that better.
  12. I do not consider the secondaries *just* melee. I consider most of them to be a combination of melee and support/utility. So please, continue to strawman me and keep the salt coming!
  13. I have to ask, do you consider 2/9 powers enough to consider an entire set "ranged"?
  14. The only word of caution I would give you is to run a thorough antivirus and antispyware scan on the machine before entering any sensitive information and/or completely wipe then reinstall the OS, just in case there are any viruses or spyware on there...
  15. Subdual is an immobilize. Sure, it deals some damage, but that's not its primary purpose. I don't have the exact numbers in front of me, but IIRC, psychic scream is like a 40' 45 degree cone - only 1/2 to 2/3 of your blast attacks. Even if it were the full 80', that's only 2/9 powers, and that makes it "ranged damage" to you?
  16. We're talking about blasters here, yes? Your PRIMARY set is where your RANGED damage comes from. Your SECONDARY set consists of utility powers and/or melee attacks. Give me a few examples that give "plenty of ranged damage", because I honestly don't see that...
  17. Your primary is where the ranged damage comes from. The secondary is to support or supplement that; Immobilizes, melee attacks, self buffs, other debuffs or utility powers. Some like tactical arrow or devices lean more toward the debuff/utility side of things.
  18. If we're going with this notion of an "Olympian EAT", then what I'd like to see is basically a variation of superstrength, only instead of any sort of rage mechanic, your melee attacks become charged with different elements, and you gain associated ranged attacks. Figure something like this: The "base" form is that of a demigod. You *only* have superstrength-like attacks any maybe a boulder throw. Then you pick which god you're going to follow; Zeus grants lightning, Prometheus grants fire, Poseidon grants water/ice, and Hades grants darkness. Your base form simply has s/l-type resistances, and you gain additional ones befitting your chosen deity. The inherent could be something like "inspirational", which grants a buff to allies near you, (sort of like a MM's supremacy). If that's too generic, maybe something like "god's wrath", where you either build up a meter to unleash a devastating attack of your deity or can otherwise channel their power for a short duration. Maybe just grant each attack a chance to cause a lightning strike/fire burst/etc.
  19. You can always choose the "minimal FX" option for bio armor, so you aren't stuck with the big growths/coverings.
  20. Can you elaborate upon how this would differ from simply rolling one of the melee ATs. Could you clearly lay out an example of their primary and/or secondary. Cheers!
  21. Personally, I find gravity extremely easy and satisfying to use, but it is a fairly early blooming set, (except for wormhole and singularity, which come later). You can trigger containment easily, and it's a fairly trivial matter to get a good attack chain going. Darkness takes a little longer to come into its own, but you do get a confuse and lots of softer controls a la tohit debuffs and fear. Dark gets a pair of temporary pets pretty early on, and they're nice to have, (though not immensely damaging IMO).
  22. That is an excellent point! If it doesn't run acceptibly, then perhaps spend your money elsewhere...
  23. I did some searching, and the closest I could find was a "tweed" pattern for certain blazers:
  24. Or... now hear me out here, CO just isn't that good of a game. Maybe, just maybe, all those people pointing out those flaws, were right. But, no... you're "telling history" because you obviously know so much better than everyone else. *rolls eyes*
  25. If gaming is your passion, but money isn't plentiful, take and work with what you got or can get.
×
×
  • Create New...