Jump to content
Hotmail and Outlook are blocking most of our emails at the moment. Please use an alternative provider when registering if possible until the issue is resolved.

arcane

Members
  • Posts

    5016
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by arcane

  1. So all of this is seriously about panda/penguin jokes? Seek help.
  2. Nor would any sane person.
  3. Besides the occasional spammer who is always swiftly dealt with, I’ve observed that this is a non-issue on Excelsior.
  4. This ain’t the Captain’s first batch of cringe posts.
  5. You mean cones obviously? Since ranged AoE’s can be used in melee no issue.
  6. Sounds like 4 star TF’s are what you’re looking for. As far as proliferating that game mode to *everything* though? Surely that would be prohibitively burdensome.
  7. His ideas may be non-starters but I sure like the way this guy talks.
  8. Sorry, I meant in addition to Breath of Fire. Since it’s clearly the inferior power you’d have to give up a 2nd thing since the set is already in good shape.
  9. What are you willing to give up for the upgrade? This powerset was already buffed substantially.
  10. I just hope they fix the animation-cancelling macro exploit on Kheldians. Macros and binds should not provide such a serious advantage in gameplay.
  11. Letting enemies 100% defeated by confused enemies award xp would very obviously be a terrible idea, sorry.
  12. Proc bombs then whatever recharge bonuses will fit.
  13. The Fighting pool is so 2022.
  14. The only real reasons to play Brutes are (1) to play the tankiest version of EA and Regen and (2) to play the scrappiest version of SS.
  15. In some cases this would be a nerf (Nucs are primarily slotted in proc bombs). In some cases this would step on D-Sync’s toes (adding recharge to Golgi would devalue Reconstruction). And overall it’s just not needed. Most of these are already plenty useful. So.. nah
  16. Dude. I enjoy playing the set. It looks cool as hell and is fun to play. It also has performance issues. These facts are not mutually exclusive. This is not hard to grasp.
  17. Lol you quoted a post then deleted every instance of me saying I like the set. Nice.
  18. Please read the posts you quote. I said I like the set - multiple times.
  19. After some 120-125 level 50’s, I’m definitely growing bored of widespread altoholism. Mainly just log into these lately: Beam/Time/Fire Blaster Cold/Psy/Psy Defender Nature/Ice/Soul Defender Fire/Fire/Fire Blaster Poison/Dark/Psy Defender Storm/Time/Fire Blaster
  20. People getting really unnecessarily defensive over Storm Blast. Just because the set is objectively subpar as a blast set doesn’t mean you’re not allowed to enjoy it. I enjoy it just fine. Likewise, enjoying it, as I do, does not make it a good set. It has extremely poor AoE damage and the single target damage doesn’t shine enough to compensate. It tries to justify this with additional mitigation, but fails in doing so because the best blast set mitigation is dead mobs.
  21. Yes it is. No it doesn’t.
  22. Yeah sometimes but I’m addicted
  23. If Category Five was as fast as Blizzard I’d have no complaints.
  24. Only real problem with the set is Category Five taking way too long to do what nukes need to do. Its single target damage is fine/good. Its AoE damage would be fine/good if it didn’t have the new worst nuke in the game.
×
×
  • Create New...