Jump to content

golstat2003

Members
  • Posts

    2382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by golstat2003

  1. I'm fine with these changes as OPTIONAL difficulty options.
  2. QFT. Some of those arcs were old BACK ON LIVE. Hell Gold Side I've done to death BACK ON LIVE. I recently tried some of the KR to Steel Canyon stuff and it reminded me why I often skip the lower levels now. Ugh.
  3. After some thought, I'm fine with this. (Recreating the maps not removing) It's not the first thing I would prioritize but if they want to do it as some point in 2025 or so, sure.
  4. You may want to change the title then. EDIT: And just caught up. A forum title rename really would be a nice feature.
  5. They need to develop new rewards for those who ha e surpasses the bet level 99 limit. That I agree with. i do not agree with rampant inflation that gets us to the silly prices we had on live.
  6. Prices being down is not worse.
  7. Nah I choose to point that people who claimed to read the thread and obviously didn’t and assign random numbers to folks are in fact a troll. i also choose to point out that those who want rampant inflation don’t really care about the health of the game. YMMV
  8. No. -1: Troll with a bit of orchish.
  9. See El Capitain very easy for anyone to put their head in the sand and just say “lalalallalalala” not listening.
  10. No. 0 - trololololololol
  11. The provided an explanation. You choose not to see it. I don’t they he’s the one trying to destroy the game. /trollranger
  12. Can definitely smell what the troll is cooking!
  13. You’re number 0: troll
  14. I consider anyone arguing for rampant inflation a troll. Full stop. yeah I don’t want the prices we have on live, where a purple coat 100 million inf. the change was 100% the right call, with prices down across the board.
  15. Yeeeeaaaah NOPE. This would pretty much make sure I would never bother with it. Incarnate content should allow you to use all of your earned incarnate abilities . . . or don't call it incarnate content.
  16. Yeah no. GMs are not easy mode for every powerset or AT. And the air-based movement of the drop ship is part of the challenge. I think that's what the person responding with that was referring to. Also I'm not so sure an Incarnate level GM "may not be too Dev intensive.
  17. No thanks. i like it as is. This would not be a better change to me. If I wanted a fury mechanic all the time I'd just play Brutes all the time.
  18. Sure, if you want to make them worth 1 merit like was suggested earlier. Or add them as a difficultly option. Other than that /jranger.
  19. Don't step into a pvp zone if you don't want pvp. This was already argued to death on live and the devs confirmed it there:. Pvp in a pvp zone is not griefing. Move on. HC is using the same ruleset as the live devs. You enter a pvp zone expect pvp. You don't want to be easily seen while you badge take invis/stealth and slot a stealth IO. Want to see stalkers? Build perception into a 2nd build. You can do your badging on that build. Giant Fing /JRANGER to the suggestions made by the OP.
  20. Quoted for the people in the back. And again I prefer the aggro cap as is.
  21. We can talk about it. I'm just saying keep expectations realistic.
×
×
  • Create New...