Monos King

Hey. I love it.

Whats funny is, seeing as his rank is literally separate from arch-villains as just "Reichsman" he totally would be immune to that setting lmao

Having the quick recharge makes the chance of proccing way lower. It's part of the user unfriendly mechanics of how procs work.

I mean I love it just from it's uniqueness. I think it would be fun to play particularly with that revised t9.

MMs have supreme single target killing ability, but fixing pet survivability is something that is on the devs radar without a doubt.

And very appropriate considering the IOs name.

I...doubt it. A lot of assumptions here, but if you dont like PvP you don't like PvP. That has it's own value, but the "what if I get spammed" and "what if people I personally dont like come" and other such slippery slopes aren't really as valid. Any addition to the game may or may not have consequences; example A. If you add a zone event to a zone that didn't then naturally more people would go there. More people going there would mean there might be more lag. More chances someone might intrude on whatever event you had planned. More chances someone might kill steal. Etc. We don't prohibit additions based off of natural indirect consequences...especially not when they would come with many options to address them like with this proposal. Essentially, your problem isn't the proposal, it's players. On that note, I think you'll find PvPers aren't nearly as bad natured as you presume.

It could work if its aimed at their feet.

If this happened then that option would be guaranteed.

Hold on a second. What about the Knight Errant temporary power? Will we still be able to get that from this?

Well if you feel that way it's all good, and I do acknowledge the other sentiments here. Just throwing in my cents for why I'd be in favor.

Oh no, in my experience there is a lot of RPing that occurs in open places. It's been that way since live, with hubs like pocket D actively encouraging it. Even now you'll see it in local, in general, in your teams, even seeing people integrate RP into how they play the characters and complete objectives. And even though I don't prefer RP, that's ok. Also I wasn't disagreeing with the idea that PvP is hated by some (as that much is definitely true as you noted). The point is, even if someone does not like seeing something, that's not a a good reason to prevent it from existing in the game. As hilarious as VileTerrors "Two chads walking in" description was, people still enjoy different things, and they all exist in the game. The scorn some have isn't valid counter point, it's just a bit self-entitled. One could even call it non-inclusive, if that resonates more for some.

Hahaha, perhaps. But you'd be surprised at how many people I've gotten into, or convinced to re-enter PvP just by casually asking them if they wanted to fight me or my pets.

Disagree, that is decidedly an opinion. It's as much of a point as "there is a time and a place for RP. I hate seeing it in Atlas Park. I don't want to see it because I despise RP, and new avenues for RP shouldn't exist because I don't want to be reminded it is a part of the game that people enjoy." That wouldn't slide, would it? Competition not being in this games DNA is also not a point. That's also very much an opinion, determined by how people decide to play this game. That's what's great about CoH, you can pretty much do what you want. Now whether or not this game is conducive to balanced PvP is subject to much, heavy discussion amongst us PvPers, but that's something else.

That's ok. Theoretically there would be the option to opt out or have an auto-decline option. Should work out for everyone. As for the second part with the not wanting to even see it break out...I'm gonna have to put that under a solid "too bad". If other people want to have this kind of thing in the game, and it's not mandatory to partake in or even receive invitations for, I can't see that mattering in the slightest. The game doesn't revolve around anti pvp sentiment. It'd be pretty damn selfish of anyone to attempt to deny what could be a fun addition for others just because they don't want to see it.

I would be very much for this. Would be great for casual PvP, and another method of giving people exposure to it as well. Being able to PvP from what's essentially their front door would be a good incentive for people that just don't want to go out of their way to incorporate it into their glancing fun time.

How about we not do this one though. There are already enough reasons to congregate at Atlas and Mercy, and some of us like going to those zones. Taking away even something like the pocket d entrance just ensures they'll be dead zones even more. Also I don't see any reason for this one to begin with, not everything needs to be accessible within seconds of making the character. If anything, just adding pocket d to mercy and atlas would be better, although wouldn't really fix the problem aforementioned.

Block of Ice inflicts all measures of slow But does not allow the slotting of slow movement IOs such as Pacing of the Turtle, Impeded Swiftness, Etc. Nor does it allow ordinary Slow enhancements. Update: This is also the case with Chilblain.

Very brief, minor suggestion. Doesn't make sense this power inflicts no -rech. This absence disrupts both theme and the layering of debuffs that would be expected of a power with a debuff secondary effect.

Well, most of the issues people have brought up in this thread already concern more than just stalkers, and rather the placate effect itself, so maybe this will finally get recognition.

Oh come on, you didn't even try to pretend you weren't ignoring everything I said there. My comments aren't a position, they are calling for him to defend his. Which it wasn't even originally, but it's become a way to get this debate out of obscurity. When you say "This car is faster than other cars" and someone says "can you prove it" you don't then say "why don't you prove your car isn't slower". That's asking for the other person to prove it for you. You're literally just going "no u". I'll be talking to @Obitus exclusively on this matter now, you may carry on once you understand basic conventions.

Not to mention I'm humoring the idea that requesting some modicum of proof when you make a claim is somehow "asking without offering". That's not how this works. When you put forth a position, it is your job to defend said position. If your position happens to be "Sentinels would, at worst, tie in clear times with a blaster" then when someone says "cool, I find that hard to believe, show me" it is incumbent on you to demonstrate, if you want your claim to hold water. Of course, I'm not saying he wasn't going to, because we were literally in the midst of negotiating before you decided to interject. Anyone sharing his position is kind of punching up here, because blasters are a damage class meant to ruin mobs, and most wouldn't think a non hyper dmg dealer would compete with them to begin with. If actually providing that evidence is somehow too much for him (which it must not be seeing how he responded, and not you) then it isn't a position he could even maintain.

Interesting. Well here's one. What was it I said in that very reply you followed with "blah blah..."

You see nihilii, when you assume the role of hypocrite, and deflect addressing explanation and evidence with You don't get to be taken seriously anymore. If you were paying attention, you would know that twice I have accepted to doing whatever Mr. Obitus likes because above all else, I want to see what I presume to be a good sentinel mess things up. Of course, I also want to see it surpass a blaster. That's why I offered to. Here's my forum warrior advice, it might sound familiar. Don't come in late. It'll make you look silly.

But I thought I wanted to see his Sentinel in action.