golstat2003

You may want to change the title then. EDIT: And just caught up. A forum title rename really would be a nice feature.

They need to develop new rewards for those who ha e surpasses the bet level 99 limit. That I agree with. i do not agree with rampant inflation that gets us to the silly prices we had on live.

Prices being down is not worse.

Nah I choose to point that people who claimed to read the thread and obviously didn’t and assign random numbers to folks are in fact a troll. i also choose to point out that those who want rampant inflation don’t really care about the health of the game. YMMV

No. -1: Troll with a bit of orchish.

See El Capitain very easy for anyone to put their head in the sand and just say “lalalallalalala” not listening.

No. 0 - trololololololol

No 0: Troll

No 0: Troll

The provided an explanation. You choose not to see it. I don’t they he’s the one trying to destroy the game. /trollranger

Can definitely smell what the troll is cooking!

/trolololololol

You’re number 0: troll

I consider anyone arguing for rampant inflation a troll. Full stop. yeah I don’t want the prices we have on live, where a purple coat 100 million inf. the change was 100% the right call, with prices down across the board.

Yeeeeaaaah NOPE. This would pretty much make sure I would never bother with it. Incarnate content should allow you to use all of your earned incarnate abilities . . . or don't call it incarnate content.

Yeah no. GMs are not easy mode for every powerset or AT. And the air-based movement of the drop ship is part of the challenge. I think that's what the person responding with that was referring to. Also I'm not so sure an Incarnate level GM "may not be too Dev intensive.

No thanks. i like it as is. This would not be a better change to me. If I wanted a fury mechanic all the time I'd just play Brutes all the time.

Form your own teams?

Sure, if you want to make them worth 1 merit like was suggested earlier. Or add them as a difficultly option. Other than that /jranger.

Don't step into a pvp zone if you don't want pvp. This was already argued to death on live and the devs confirmed it there:. Pvp in a pvp zone is not griefing. Move on. HC is using the same ruleset as the live devs. You enter a pvp zone expect pvp. You don't want to be easily seen while you badge take invis/stealth and slot a stealth IO. Want to see stalkers? Build perception into a 2nd build. You can do your badging on that build. Giant Fing /JRANGER to the suggestions made by the OP.

Quoted for the people in the back. And again I prefer the aggro cap as is.

We can talk about it. I'm just saying keep expectations realistic.

QFT. I think they've already made the decision to look at the outliers and not take the literal YEARS it would take to buff up everything else. I think some posters on these forums have completely balls to the walls unrealistic expectations from a fully volunteer dev team. Let's keep it real folks.

Unless they intend to start dropping fully crafted IOs as mission/enemy defeat rewards, it has plenty of relevance.

I prefer the aggro cap as is.