Jump to content
Hotmail and Outlook are blocking most of our emails at the moment. Please use an alternative provider when registering if possible until the issue is resolved.

golstat2003

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2259

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Everything posted by golstat2003

  1. golstat2003
    I'm okay with set by set balance. I'm not okay with whole nerfs that don't take the time to recognize what that does on set by set and power by power basis. Thankfully the HC devs seem to recognize that careful balance is better than wanton, unresearched nerfs.
  2. golstat2003
    No thanks. Make another encounter/zone with that cap. Or move it into LFG where those who want that can do it with less for the challenge.
  3. golstat2003
    Eh, just make it another encounter that anyone can launch whenever they want and leave the base zone alone. Everyone wins that way.
  4. golstat2003
    I could get behind a new encounter with a powered up version of him or the option to make him more difficult based on challenge settings. Leave the BASE ITF as is please.
  5. golstat2003
    They are what they should be based on the effort of organizing that many folks to do that content. Forming, leading and running a hamidon raid is NOT a simple matter, no matter how easy the raid leaders (and raid participants) make it seem.
  6. golstat2003
    Some of these ideas for ice an intriguing. I will say it needs something. I had an ice armor tanker on live, but pretty much didn't bother to roll one here. I might change my mind if these changes were made.
  7. golstat2003
    I find the tentacles extremely ugly and disturbing actually. So one vote from me against. 😞
  8. golstat2003
    No thanks, unless they can make changing it an option. The visual is nice as it tells me when the proc actually worked, then I can stack another hold. I like it.
  9. golstat2003
    Pass. I think Nuke and recharge damage is fine where it is. Changing them would once again send them to the rash heep for me.
  10. golstat2003
    I pretty much hide all that noise when playing. Unfortunately I can't for obvious reasons (on a support toon). 😞 Yes, please fix/revamp/enhance, etc. that area.
  11. golstat2003
    I've seen plenty of high end builds that skip hasten and do just fine. It really depends on what type of build you're aiming for.
  12. golstat2003
    I prefer Tri-Form. IOs make a hell of a lot of difference. I made both of mine high recharge and soloing with them is some of the easiest soloing in COH I've had to date. On teams they shine even more. I don't consider either to be hard to play, if you've got a even a bit of experience with more than 1 AT. If you're new to COH, different story. LOL
  13. golstat2003
    I . . . don't remember them being tanky. At all. More like floating blasters that were squishy than blasters.
  14. golstat2003
    With enough recharge you can still get out two at the same time. But it's a VERY high level of recharge needed. (Mine has 180% total recharge) Also for the thread, on live, I don't remember them ever being all that tanky, just floating fluff balls that blasteed.
  15. golstat2003
    Pretty much why I stopped playing COV on Live for long stretches of time. That, the depressing atmosphere and the atrocity that was Grandville back on live. Thankfully alot of the memory leakiness seems to have been fixed since then via the work of the private servers for that zone. Either that or it's cause our computers got better. 😛
  16. golstat2003
    This would effectively end my time playing on Homecoming. I bet for a lot of other folks also.
  17. golstat2003
    You should be able to put in an exemption in McAfee for the site you download Mids from. I haven't done this in McAfee in ages, but pretty sure it exists. Also the other option is to temporarily turn off McAfee then turn it back on, after you download/use Mids.
  18. golstat2003
    With that said after you have gone as far as you want in the Incarnate path, nothing wrong with converting them into Reward Merits and then those Reward Merits into enhancement converters and making some money, err inf on the market. It's what I do after I'm Tier 4'd out on my Incarnates. 🙂
  19. golstat2003
    Lore wise it might get a bit confusing if they haven't left yet . . . but that doesn't seem like a large drawback to this suggestion. I say do it anyway. Consider this a bump.
  20. golstat2003
    Ahhh that makes sense.
  21. golstat2003
    They could use the "master of" settings and just add rewards for them. Add a disable all set bonuses feature to that.
  22. golstat2003
    This. I'm pretty much done with lower level content. I'd like to use my full EARNED abilities in content. Shape or call that however you like.
  23. golstat2003
    They can create both stuff that is a level higher (aka, yes you do need to be more in line with where they need you to be when doing the later trails) and stuff that's more beginner like the BAF that can help unlock the early parts of incarnacy. (not sure if word) They can do both.
  24. golstat2003
    Meh, no thanks. I'd prefer for level progression to actually mean something. Other servers tried this and it was aweful.
  25. golstat2003
    Sure, ONLY in a pvp zone.
×
×
  • Create New...